Wiles Rebecca, Varadpande Mandar, Muly Sudha, Webb Jolanta
Radiology Dept, Aintree University Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Radiology Dept, Aintree University Hospital NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Surgeon. 2014 Aug;12(4):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
The overall aim of this systematic review was to determine whether ultrasound (US) follow up for gallbladder polyps (GBPs) measuring less than 10 mms is necessary.
A search was performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE between January 1976 and January 2012 using keywords: gallbladder, polyps, neoplasm, cancer, tumour, carcinoma, malignant, adenoma. Included were studies involving adult patients, examined with transabdominal US at least twice. The outcomes of included studies were gallbladder polyp growth as demonstrated on US over time, followed where available by histological examination of cholecystectomy specimens.
Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. Altogether 1958 subjects with mean age between 41.5 and 59 years were followed up with US. The percentage of GBPs which showed growth over the follow up period ranged from 1% to 23%. 43 neoplastic polyps were found in total irrespective of size, 20 of which were malignant and at least 7 of those were >10 mms. At least 7 malignancies were present in polyps <10 mms but it was unknown if they had undergone growth on follow up.
Level II-2 and below evidence on rate of growth of small GBPs <10 mms exists in the literature. It indicates that growth does occur in a significant minority of small GBPs, but it is slow. Due to deficient reporting and small numbers of cases, the correlation between growth of GBP and development of malignancy cannot be established using currently available evidence. Malignancy can be present in polyps <10 mms although it is significantly more frequent in polyps >10 mms. Cholecystectomy for symptomatic GBPs irrespective of their size, alongside the current practice for removal of gall bladders containing asymptomatic polyps >10 mms, is proposed. No evidence based US follow up schedule can be recommended at present for asymptomatic polyps <10 mms, and in its absence an intuitive follow up with US is likely to continue.
本系统评价的总体目标是确定对于直径小于10毫米的胆囊息肉(GBP)进行超声(US)随访是否必要。
于1976年1月至2012年1月期间在MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中进行检索,使用的关键词有:胆囊、息肉、肿瘤、癌症、瘤、癌、恶性、腺瘤。纳入的研究涉及成年患者,至少接受过两次经腹超声检查。纳入研究的结果为超声显示的胆囊息肉随时间的生长情况,如有可能,随后对胆囊切除标本进行组织学检查。
10项研究符合本评价的纳入标准。共有1958名平均年龄在41.5至59岁之间的受试者接受了超声随访。在随访期间显示生长的GBP百分比范围为1%至23%。无论大小,共发现43个肿瘤性息肉,其中20个为恶性,且其中至少7个直径>10毫米。直径<10毫米的息肉中至少有7个为恶性,但不清楚它们在随访中是否生长。
文献中存在关于直径<10毫米的小GBP生长率的II-2级及以下证据。这表明相当一部分小GBP确实会生长,但生长缓慢。由于报告不足和病例数量少,目前无法利用现有证据确定GBP生长与恶性肿瘤发生之间的相关性。直径<10毫米的息肉中也可能存在恶性肿瘤,尽管在直径>10毫米的息肉中更为常见。建议对有症状的GBP进行胆囊切除术,无论其大小如何,同时按照目前的做法切除含有直径>10毫米无症状息肉的胆囊。目前对于直径<10毫米的无症状息肉,无法推荐基于证据的超声随访时间表,在此情况下,可能会继续进行直观的超声随访。