• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The growth rates of solitary gallbladder polyps compared to multi-polyps: A quantitative analysis.孤立性胆囊息肉与多发性息肉的生长速率:一项定量分析。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Sep 22;25(1):28-35. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12284. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
The risk of malignancy in ultrasound detected gallbladder polyps: A systematic review.超声检查发现的胆囊息肉恶性肿瘤风险:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.061. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
Is cholecystectomy a reasonable treatment option for simple gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm?胆囊切除术对于直径大于10毫米的单纯性胆囊息肉来说是一种合理的治疗选择吗?
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 14;21(14):4248-54. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4248.
4
Predictive factors of neoplastic gallbladder polyps: Outcomes of 278 patients.胆囊肿瘤性息肉的预测因素:278例患者的结果
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;28(3):202-206. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.16698. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
Neoplastic polyps in gallbladder: a retrospective study to determine risk factors and treatment strategy for gallbladder polyps.胆囊肿瘤性息肉:一项确定胆囊息肉危险因素及治疗策略的回顾性研究
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019 Jun;8(3):219-227. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.12.15.
6
Growth rate and malignant potential of small gallbladder polyps--systematic review of evidence.小胆囊息肉的生长速率及恶性潜能——证据的系统评价
Surgeon. 2014 Aug;12(4):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
7
The accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.超声检查诊断胆囊息肉的准确性。
Radiography (Lond). 2020 May;26(2):e52-e55. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.10.010. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
A nomogram-based model and ultrasonic radiomic features for gallbladder polyp classification.基于列线图模型和超声影像组学特征的胆囊息肉分类。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jul;37(7):1380-1388. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15841. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
9
Are there modifiable risk factors affecting the prevalence of gallbladder polyps or those 5 mm or larger? A retrospective cross-sectional study.是否存在可改变的危险因素影响胆囊息肉或直径为 5 毫米或更大的息肉的患病率?一项回顾性横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 3;100(35):e27115. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027115.
10
Gallbladder polypoid lesions >15mm as indicators of T1b gallbladder cancer risk.胆囊息肉样病变>15mm作为T1b期胆囊癌风险的指标。
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;18(3):156-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography.三位不同放射科医师经腹部超声测量胆囊息肉大小的比较。
Tomography. 2024 Jul 3;10(7):1031-1041. doi: 10.3390/tomography10070077.
2
Gallbladder polyps growth rate is an independent risk factor for neoplastic polyps.胆囊息肉的生长速度是肿瘤性息肉的一个独立危险因素。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Sep;10(7):651-656. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12274. Epub 2022 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallbladder Polyps: Current Perspectives.胆囊息肉的诊断与治疗:当前观点
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2019 Jan-Jun;9(1):40-48. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1294.
2
Current practices and future prospects for the management of gallbladder polyps: A topical review.胆囊息肉的治疗现状及未来展望:一篇综述
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 14;24(26):2844-2852. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2844.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography for gallbladder polyps: systematic review.经腹超声检查对胆囊息肉的诊断准确性:系统评价
Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):200-207. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011617.
4
Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps : Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery - European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).胆囊息肉的管理与随访:欧洲胃肠与腹部放射学会(ESGAR)、欧洲内镜外科学会及其他介入技术学会(EAES)、国际消化外科学会 - 欧洲联合会(EFISDS)和欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)联合指南
Eur Radiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):3856-3866. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4742-y. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
The risk of malignancy in ultrasound detected gallbladder polyps: A systematic review.超声检查发现的胆囊息肉恶性肿瘤风险:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.061. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
6
Evidence based management of polyps of the gall bladder: A systematic review of the risk factors of malignancy.胆囊息肉的循证管理:恶性风险因素的系统评价
Surgeon. 2016 Oct;14(5):278-86. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
7
Gallbladder Cancer in the 21st Century.21世纪的胆囊癌
J Oncol. 2015;2015:967472. doi: 10.1155/2015/967472. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Management and diagnosis of gallbladder polyps: a systematic review.胆囊息肉的管理与诊断:一项系统综述
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 May;400(4):455-62. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1302-2. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
9
Growth rate and malignant potential of small gallbladder polyps--systematic review of evidence.小胆囊息肉的生长速率及恶性潜能——证据的系统评价
Surgeon. 2014 Aug;12(4):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
10
Gallbladder polyps: factors affecting surgical decision.胆囊息肉:影响手术决策的因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 28;19(28):4526-30. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i28.4526.

孤立性胆囊息肉与多发性息肉的生长速率:一项定量分析。

The growth rates of solitary gallbladder polyps compared to multi-polyps: A quantitative analysis.

作者信息

Diep Raymond, Lombardo Paul, Schneider Michal

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Sep 22;25(1):28-35. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12284. eCollection 2022 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/ajum.12284
PMID:35251900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8873638/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several studies suggest solitary gallbladder polyps (GBPs) have an increased malignancy risk compared to multi-polyps. Furthermore, some malignant GBPs possessed faster growth rates compared to benign GBPs. To our knowledge, no study has established a relationship between GBP number and growth rates. Hence, this study aims to: (i) determine whether there is a statistical significance in growth rates between solitary GBPs versus multi-polyps; (ii) determine, in a four-year period, the proportion of GBPs in this study's total cohort that exhibit growth compared to previous studies.

METHODS

A retrospective, quantitative, cohort study was implemented utilising 100 consecutive patient records from three private radiology clinics. These were assessed against the eligibility criteria and allocated into the solitary or multi-polyp study group, depending on number of GBPs detected on initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations conducted 6-48 months later. Patient age, GBP sizes, time interval between initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations and GBP growth rates were compared between the study groups utilising Student's tests.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the study groups according to gender, age, GBP size and time between ultrasound examinations. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the growth rates of solitary and multi-polyp groups (P = 0.77). Most GBPs [92/100 (92%)] grew <2 mm in maximal diameter, while 8/100 (8%) of GBPs grew ≥2 mm in maximal diameter at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The large majority of GBPs maintained size stability at follow-up. On average, solitary GBPs did not grow faster than multi-polyps, although further research is recommended to reinforce this.

摘要

目的

多项研究表明,与多发性胆囊息肉相比,孤立性胆囊息肉(GBP)的恶变风险更高。此外,一些恶性GBP的生长速度比良性GBP更快。据我们所知,尚无研究证实GBP数量与生长速度之间存在关联。因此,本研究旨在:(i)确定孤立性GBP与多发性GBP的生长速度是否存在统计学差异;(ii)在四年时间内,确定本研究队列中GBP生长的比例,并与以往研究进行比较。

方法

采用回顾性定量队列研究,收集了来自三家私立放射诊所的100例连续患者记录。根据入选标准对这些记录进行评估,并根据初次及6 - 48个月后进行的随访超声检查中检测到的GBP数量,将患者分为孤立性或多发性研究组。使用学生t检验比较研究组之间的患者年龄、GBP大小、初次与随访超声检查之间的时间间隔以及GBP生长速度。

结果

研究组之间在性别、年龄、GBP大小和超声检查间隔时间方面未发现统计学显著差异。此外,孤立性和多发性GBP组的生长速度之间也没有统计学显著差异(P = 0.77)。大多数GBP[92/100(92%)]最大直径增长<2 mm,而8/100(8%)的GBP在随访时最大直径增长≥2 mm。

结论

大多数GBP在随访期间保持大小稳定。平均而言,孤立性GBP的生长速度并不比多发性GBP快,不过建议进一步开展研究以加强这一结论。