Diep Raymond, Lombardo Paul, Schneider Michal
Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Sep 22;25(1):28-35. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12284. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Several studies suggest solitary gallbladder polyps (GBPs) have an increased malignancy risk compared to multi-polyps. Furthermore, some malignant GBPs possessed faster growth rates compared to benign GBPs. To our knowledge, no study has established a relationship between GBP number and growth rates. Hence, this study aims to: (i) determine whether there is a statistical significance in growth rates between solitary GBPs versus multi-polyps; (ii) determine, in a four-year period, the proportion of GBPs in this study's total cohort that exhibit growth compared to previous studies.
A retrospective, quantitative, cohort study was implemented utilising 100 consecutive patient records from three private radiology clinics. These were assessed against the eligibility criteria and allocated into the solitary or multi-polyp study group, depending on number of GBPs detected on initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations conducted 6-48 months later. Patient age, GBP sizes, time interval between initial and follow-up ultrasound examinations and GBP growth rates were compared between the study groups utilising Student's tests.
No statistically significant difference was found between the study groups according to gender, age, GBP size and time between ultrasound examinations. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the growth rates of solitary and multi-polyp groups (P = 0.77). Most GBPs [92/100 (92%)] grew <2 mm in maximal diameter, while 8/100 (8%) of GBPs grew ≥2 mm in maximal diameter at follow-up.
The large majority of GBPs maintained size stability at follow-up. On average, solitary GBPs did not grow faster than multi-polyps, although further research is recommended to reinforce this.
多项研究表明,与多发性胆囊息肉相比,孤立性胆囊息肉(GBP)的恶变风险更高。此外,一些恶性GBP的生长速度比良性GBP更快。据我们所知,尚无研究证实GBP数量与生长速度之间存在关联。因此,本研究旨在:(i)确定孤立性GBP与多发性GBP的生长速度是否存在统计学差异;(ii)在四年时间内,确定本研究队列中GBP生长的比例,并与以往研究进行比较。
采用回顾性定量队列研究,收集了来自三家私立放射诊所的100例连续患者记录。根据入选标准对这些记录进行评估,并根据初次及6 - 48个月后进行的随访超声检查中检测到的GBP数量,将患者分为孤立性或多发性研究组。使用学生t检验比较研究组之间的患者年龄、GBP大小、初次与随访超声检查之间的时间间隔以及GBP生长速度。
研究组之间在性别、年龄、GBP大小和超声检查间隔时间方面未发现统计学显著差异。此外,孤立性和多发性GBP组的生长速度之间也没有统计学显著差异(P = 0.77)。大多数GBP[92/100(92%)]最大直径增长<2 mm,而8/100(8%)的GBP在随访时最大直径增长≥2 mm。
大多数GBP在随访期间保持大小稳定。平均而言,孤立性GBP的生长速度并不比多发性GBP快,不过建议进一步开展研究以加强这一结论。