New York University, Departments of Anthropology and Psychiatry, New York, NY 10003, USA; Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, USA.
University of Pennsylvania, Departments of Anthropology and Family and Community Medicine, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;103:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.033.
In 1996 the U.S. severely restricted public support for low income people, ending "welfare as we know it." This led to dramatic increases in medicalized forms of support for indigent people, who increasingly rely on disability benefits justified by psychiatric diagnoses of chronic mental illness. We present case studies drawn from ethnographic data involving daily participant-observation between 2005 and 2012 in public clinics and impoverished neighborhoods in New York City, to describe the subjective experience of structural stigma imposed by the increasing medicalization of public support for the poor through a diagnosis of permanent mental disability. In some cases, disability benefits enable recipients to fulfill important social roles (sustaining a vulnerable household and promoting stable parenting). The status of family members who receive a monthly disability check improves within their kin and neighborhood-based networks, counterbalancing the felt stigma of being identified by doctors as "crazy". When a diagnosis of mental pathology becomes a valuable survival strategy constituting the basis for fulfillment of household responsibilities, stigmatizing processes are structurally altered. Through the decades, the stigmatized labels applied to the poor have shifted: from being a symptom of racial weakness, to the culture of poverty, and now to permanent medical pathology. The neoliberal bureaucratic requirement that the poor must repeatedly prove their "disabled" status through therapy and psychotropic medication appears to be generating a national and policy-maker discourse condemning SSI malingerers, resurrecting the 16th century specter of the "unworthy poor".
1996 年,美国大幅限制了对低收入人群的公共支持,结束了“我们所知道的福利”。这导致了对贫困人群的医疗支持形式急剧增加,他们越来越依赖精神疾病的精神病诊断来获得残疾福利。我们提供了一些案例研究,这些研究来自于 2005 年至 2012 年在纽约市公立诊所和贫困社区进行的民族志数据,描述了通过永久性精神残疾诊断,对贫困人群的公共支持日益医疗化所带来的结构性污名的主观体验。在某些情况下,残疾福利使接受者能够履行重要的社会角色(维持脆弱的家庭和促进稳定的育儿)。在亲属和邻里网络中,领取每月残疾支票的家庭成员的地位得到提高,从而抵消了被医生认定为“疯狂”的耻辱感。当精神病理学的诊断成为一种有价值的生存策略,构成履行家庭责任的基础时,污名化过程就会在结构上发生改变。几十年来,应用于穷人的污名标签已经发生了转变:从种族弱点的症状,到贫困文化,现在是永久性的医学病理学。新自由主义官僚主义要求穷人必须通过治疗和精神药物反复证明自己的“残疾”状态,这似乎正在引发一场全国性的和决策者的话语谴责,谴责那些滥用社会安全保障金的人,重新唤起了 16 世纪“不值得的穷人”的幽灵。