Suppr超能文献

值得深思的问题:食品券耻辱感、粮食不安全与性别之间的交集。

Food for thought: The intersection between SNAP stigma, food insecurity, and gender.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States; Westat Inc., Rockville, MD, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2024 Nov;361:117367. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117367. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) helps millions of families with low incomes to afford and purchase food each year. Prior research has noted that welfare stigma-negative stereotypes about people who participate in public assistance programs-can limit SNAP participation. Stigma may also contribute to worse mental health among subgroups like male participants; qualitative evidence suggests males may struggle to accept public assistance benefits due to norms surrounding gender roles. Yet there is little research about who is most likely to experience stigma, how stigma relates to food insecurity, whether this relationship varies by gender identity, and whether stigma is associated with online shopping (which may protect against stigma). To address these gaps, we analyzed a national survey of 1383 SNAP participants about their experiences of SNAP stigma, food insecurity, and online shopping. In adjusted models, we found that male participants had 40% higher odds (95% CI: 1.09-1.80) of reporting any stigma experience compared to female participants. SNAP participants reporting stigma had over three times the odds (OR: 3.54, 95% CI: 2.60-4.81) of reporting food insecurity relative to those not reporting stigma, and male participants reporting stigma had nearly three times higher odds of food insecurity than female participants reporting stigma (OR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.53, 5.66). In addition, stigma was not significantly associated with shopping online or using SNAP benefits online. In this national sample of SNAP participants, male respondents had greater odds of welfare stigma, experiences of stigma were associated with greater odds of food insecurity, male respondents experiencing stigma had greater odds of food insecurity compared to female respondents, and stigma was not associated with online shopping behaviors. Efforts to reframe public assistance may be needed to destigmatize programs like SNAP to both improve program uptake among non-participants and improve health outcomes among participants.

摘要

补充营养援助计划(SNAP)每年帮助数以百万计的低收入家庭负担和购买食品。先前的研究指出,福利污名——对参与公共援助计划的人的负面刻板印象——可能会限制 SNAP 的参与。污名将导致某些亚群体(如男性参与者)的心理健康状况恶化;定性证据表明,由于围绕性别角色的规范,男性可能难以接受公共援助福利。然而,关于谁最有可能经历污名、污名与食品不安全的关系、这种关系是否因性别认同而异以及污名是否与在线购物(可能有助于避免污名)有关的研究甚少。为了解决这些差距,我们分析了一项针对 1383 名 SNAP 参与者的全国性调查,调查他们对 SNAP 污名、食品不安全和在线购物的经历。在调整后的模型中,我们发现男性参与者报告任何污名经历的可能性比女性参与者高 40%(95%CI:1.09-1.80)。与没有报告污名的参与者相比,报告污名的 SNAP 参与者报告食品不安全的可能性高出三倍以上(OR:3.54,95%CI:2.60-4.81),而报告污名的男性参与者报告食品不安全的可能性比报告污名的女性参与者高近三倍(OR:2.94,95%CI:1.53,5.66)。此外,污名与在线购物或在线使用 SNAP 福利无关。在这个 SNAP 参与者的全国性样本中,男性受访者更有可能受到福利污名的影响,经历污名与更大的食品不安全几率相关,与女性受访者相比,经历污名的男性受访者更有可能出现食品不安全问题,而污名与在线购物行为无关。可能需要努力重新定义公共援助,以消除 SNAP 等计划的污名,从而提高非参与者的计划参与率,并改善参与者的健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1147/11846313/1ea0e23070e5/nihms-2028513-f0001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Food insecurity and mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.食物不安全与心理健康:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jul;23(10):1778-1790. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900435X. Epub 2020 Mar 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验