• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎动脉沟 4mm 高度真的是 C1 椎弓根螺钉置入的限制因素吗?

Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, No. 76 Nanguo Road, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China,

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1109-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3217-y. Epub 2014 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-014-3217-y
PMID:24509775
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of C1 pedicle screw fixation in patients whose atlas vertebral artery groove (defined as the C1 pedicle) height is less than 4 mm, but with a medullary canal.

METHODS

From January 2010 to January 2013, 7 patients (6 males, 1 female) with atlantoaxial instability whose C1 pedicle height was less than 4.0 mm on one or both sides were treated by C1 pedicle screw fixation at our institution. Thirteen of the 14 C1 pedicles were less than 4.0 mm in height, but all had a medullary canal. Patients were followed up at regular intervals. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to assess if C1 pedicle screw placement was successful. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to postoperative complications, the American Spinal Injury Association grading system, and bone graft status.

RESULTS

Thirteen C1 pedicles with a height less than 4.0 mm were inserted by 13 3.5- or 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screws, and one C1 pedicle whose height was 4.1 mm was inserted by a 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screw. In addition, 14 pedicle screws were inserted in the axis. The mean follow-up period was 23 (range 8-38) months. No neurologic or vascular complications occurred in any of the seven patients. Postoperative CT three-dimensional reconstruction images showed that all 14 pedicle screws were inserted in the C1 pedicles without destruction of the atlas pedicle cortical bone. All patients demonstrated bony fusion 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

If there is a medullary canal in the C1 pedicle, a 3.5- or 4.0-mm-diameter pedicle screw can be safely inserted into the atlas and C1 pedicle screw fixation can be performed without any impact on fixation stability and clinical efficacy, even if the C1 pedicle height is less than 4.0 mm.

摘要

目的

探讨高度小于 4mm 但存在椎管的枢椎椎弓根(定义为 C1 椎弓根)能否进行 C1 椎弓根螺钉固定及其可行性和有效性。

方法

2010 年 1 月至 2013 年 1 月,本院对 7 例(6 男 1 女)单侧或双侧 C1 椎弓根高度小于 4.0mm 的寰枢椎不稳患者行 C1 椎弓根螺钉固定术。14 枚 C1 椎弓根中,有 13 枚高度小于 4.0mm,但均存在椎管。定期随访,术后行 CT 扫描评估 C1 椎弓根螺钉位置是否满意。根据术后并发症、美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级和植骨情况评估临床疗效。

结果

13 枚高度小于 4.0mm 的 C1 椎弓根使用 3.5mm 或 4.0mm 直径的椎弓根螺钉固定,1 枚高度为 4.1mm 的 C1 椎弓根使用 4.0mm 直径的椎弓根螺钉固定,同时对枢椎也进行了椎弓根螺钉固定。平均随访时间为 23(8~38)个月。7 例患者均无神经或血管并发症发生。术后 CT 三维重建图像显示,14 枚椎弓根螺钉均位于 C1 椎弓根内,未破坏寰椎椎弓根皮质骨。所有患者术后 6 个月均获得骨性融合。

结论

如果 C1 椎弓根存在椎管,即使 C1 椎弓根高度小于 4.0mm,也可使用 3.5mm 或 4.0mm 直径的椎弓根螺钉安全地置入寰椎和枢椎,并进行 C1 椎弓根螺钉固定,不会影响固定的稳定性和临床疗效。

相似文献

1
Is the 4 mm height of the vertebral artery groove really a limitation of C1 pedicle screw insertion?椎动脉沟 4mm 高度真的是 C1 椎弓根螺钉置入的限制因素吗?
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1109-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3217-y. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
2
The feasibility of inserting a C1 pedicle screw in patients with ponticulus posticus: a retrospective analysis of eleven patients.在有后桥小脑角的患者中植入C1椎弓根螺钉的可行性:对11例患者的回顾性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1058-1063. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4589-y. Epub 2016 May 31.
3
Transposterior Arch Lateral Mass Screw for C1 Fixation: Application of a 3.5-mm-Diameter Screw in the Vertebral Artery Groove with a Height of ≤3.5 mm.经后弓侧块螺钉固定 C1:在高度≤3.5mm 的椎动脉沟内应用 3.5mm 直径螺钉。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:e480-e487. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.175. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
4
C1 Titanium Cables Combined with C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability Not Suitable for Placement of C1 Screws.C1钛缆结合C2椎弓根螺钉-棒固定治疗不适于C1螺钉置入的寰枢椎不稳。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e453-e456. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.103. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
5
Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra.第一颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入的解剖学考量
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 1;30(13):1519-23. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000168546.17788.49.
6
C2 pedicle screw and plate combined with C1 titanium cable fixation for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability not suitable for placement of C1 screw.C2椎弓根螺钉钢板联合C1钛缆固定治疗不适合置入C1螺钉的寰枢椎不稳
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Oct;21(7):514-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31815c5fba.
7
Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1-C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws.椎动脉损伤风险:C1-C2 经关节突螺钉与 C2 椎弓根螺钉的比较。
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):775-85. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
C1-2 Pedicle Screw Fixation for Ponticulus Posticus and Duplication of Vertebral Artery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.枢椎椎弓根螺钉固定治疗颅底陷入合并椎动脉走行异常:二维手术视频
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Mar 15;20(4):E298-E299. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa397.
9
Radiological evaluation of C1 pedicle screw anatomic feasibility.寰椎椎弓根螺钉解剖学可行性的影像学评估。
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 May;51:18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
10
[Harms technique of C1-C2 fixation with polyaxial screws and rods].[使用多轴螺钉和棒进行C1-C2固定的哈姆斯技术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(1):22-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and evaluation of C1 posterior arch variation for transpedicular screw placement between patients with and without basilar invagination.寰椎后弓 C1 特征及其在颅底凹陷症与非颅底凹陷症患者经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定术中的评估。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Oct;32(10):3547-3560. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07873-4. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Robotics in Cervical Spine Surgery: Feasibility and Safety of Posterior Screw Placement.颈椎手术中的机器人技术:后路螺钉置入的可行性与安全性
Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):329-339. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244952.476. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
The morphological classification and clinical significance of atlas vertebral artery sulcus based on computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction.

本文引用的文献

1
Anatomic Consideration of the C1 Laminar Arch for Lateral Mass Screw Fixation via C1 Lateral Lamina : A Landmark between the Lateral and Posterior Lamina of the C1.通过C1侧块进行C1椎板螺钉固定时C1椎板弓的解剖学考量:C1侧块与后弓之间的一个标志
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013 Jul;54(1):25-9. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.54.1.25. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis.经后弓行 C1 侧块螺钉置钉:技术比较与解剖分析。
Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
3
An anatomic consideration of C2 vertebrae artery groove variation for individual screw implantation in axis.
基于 CT 三维重建的寰椎椎动脉沟的形态学分类及临床意义。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Mar;45(3):241-246. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03079-x. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
Treatment of Upper Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (Unstable C1-C2) by Direct Visualization and Nailing Technique and the Advantages of Early MRI.直接可视化和钉钉技术治疗上颈椎脊髓损伤(不稳定 C1-C2)和早期 MRI 的优势。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Sep 29;2021:4562618. doi: 10.1155/2021/4562618. eCollection 2021.
5
Posterior atlantoaxial fusion: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques and relevant vascular anomalies.寰枢椎后路融合术:手术技术及相关血管异常的全面综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):164-180. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.03.05.
6
Atlas posterior arch and vertebral artery's groove variants: a classification, morphometric study, clinical and surgical implications.寰椎后弓及椎动脉沟变异:分类、形态学研究、临床及手术意义
Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 Sep;41(9):985-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02256-1. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Endoscopic transnasal anterior release and posterior reduction without odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.内镜经鼻前路松解和后路复位术治疗不可复位的寰枢椎脱位,无需行齿状突切除术。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 6;14(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1167-0.
8
Gallie technique versus atlantoaxial screw-rod constructs in the treatment of atlantoaxial sagittal instability: a retrospective study of 49 patients.加利技术与寰枢椎螺钉-棒系统治疗寰枢椎矢状面不稳的对比:49例患者的回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jul 11;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0607-y.
9
The feasibility of inserting a C1 pedicle screw in patients with ponticulus posticus: a retrospective analysis of eleven patients.在有后桥小脑角的患者中植入C1椎弓根螺钉的可行性:对11例患者的回顾性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1058-1063. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4589-y. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Anatomical feasibility for safe occipital condyle screw fixation.安全枕髁螺钉固定的解剖学可行性。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1674-82. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4399-2. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
寰椎椎动脉沟解剖变异对枢椎个体化螺钉植入的影响
Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul;22(7):1547-52. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2779-4. Epub 2013 May 10.
4
Feasibility of rigid upper cervical instrumentation in children: tomographic analysis of children aged 2-6.儿童上颈椎刚性内固定的可行性:2至6岁儿童的断层扫描分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 May;27(3):E110-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318291ce46.
5
Impact of Starting Point and Bicortical Purchase of C1 Lateral Mass Screws on Atlantoaxial Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.C1侧块螺钉起始点及双皮质固定对寰枢椎融合的影响:Meta分析及文献综述
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Aug;28(7):242-53. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828ffc97.
6
Feasibility of laminar screw placement in the upper thoracic spine: analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomographic simulation.在上胸椎中进行层状螺钉放置的可行性:使用三维计算机断层扫描模拟进行分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):1146-53. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828aadf5.
7
Morphology of the atlas pedicle revisited: a morphometric CT-based study on 120 patients.寰椎椎弓根形态学再探讨:120 例患者基于 CT 的形态计量学研究。
Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1142-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2662-3. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
8
Routine insertion of the lateral mass screw via the posterior arch for C1 fixation: feasibility and related complications.经后路寰椎后弓置钉固定颈椎侧块螺钉的常规入路:可行性及相关并发症。
Spine J. 2012 Jun;12(6):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
9
Evaluation of anatomic landmarks and safe zones for screw placement in the atlas via the posterior arch.经后弓评估寰椎解剖标志和螺钉置钉安全区。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jan;19(1):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1181-8. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
10
Anatomic determination of optimal entry point and direction for C1 lateral mass screw placement.C1侧块螺钉置入最佳进针点和方向的解剖学确定
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun;22(4):233-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31817ff95a.