• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁和非抑郁受试者对过去、未来、喜悦、悲伤和幸福的认知表征（隐喻概念化）：抑郁在概念层面的认知扭曲

Cognitive representations (Metaphorical Conceptualizations) of past, future, joy, sadness and happiness in depressive and non-depressive subjects: cognitive distortions in depression at the level of notion.

作者信息

Bartczak Marlena, Bokus Barbara

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Stawki 5/7, 00-183, Warsaw, Poland,

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Apr;44(2):159-85. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9286-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-014-9286-6
PMID:24510583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4357654/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to see if and how the intensity of depression correlates with the cognitive representation of notions, and if any influence is reversed during remission. The cognitive representation indices used were the valence and number of metaphors produced for a notion. Three adult groups took part: persons with depression ([Formula: see text]), persons in remission ([Formula: see text]), and a control group ([Formula: see text]). Five notions were considered: PAST, FUTURE, JOY, SADNESS, and HAPPINESS. The Questionnaire of the Metaphorical Conceptualization of a Notion was used. The results showed that (a) depressive subjects did not have problems with metaphorical processing, (b) depressive subjects demonstrated strong interpretational negativism, (c) subjects during remission did not present distorted conceptual processing. The results are discussed in the context of theories of automatic metaphor processing, and conceptions of cognitive depressive distortions, in tasks requiring effort and substantial involvement of cognitive resources.

摘要

本研究的目的是探究抑郁强度是否以及如何与概念的认知表征相关，以及在缓解期这种影响是否会逆转。所使用的认知表征指标是为一个概念生成的隐喻的效价和数量。三个成年组参与了研究：抑郁症患者（[公式：见正文]）、缓解期患者（[公式：见正文]）和对照组（[公式：见正文]）。考虑了五个概念：过去、未来、喜悦、悲伤和幸福。使用了概念隐喻概念化问卷。结果表明：（a）抑郁受试者在隐喻加工方面没有问题；（b）抑郁受试者表现出强烈的解释性消极主义；（c）缓解期受试者没有呈现出扭曲的概念加工。在自动隐喻加工理论以及认知抑郁扭曲概念的背景下，对这些结果进行了讨论，这些讨论涉及需要努力和大量认知资源参与的任务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/4357654/2f99bf57e95e/10936_2014_9286_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/4357654/fde1a9c62bf8/10936_2014_9286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/4357654/5482861332f9/10936_2014_9286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/4357654/2f99bf57e95e/10936_2014_9286_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/4357654/fde1a9c62bf8/10936_2014_9286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/4357654/5482861332f9/10936_2014_9286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57d5/4357654/2f99bf57e95e/10936_2014_9286_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive representations (Metaphorical Conceptualizations) of past, future, joy, sadness and happiness in depressive and non-depressive subjects: cognitive distortions in depression at the level of notion.抑郁和非抑郁受试者对过去、未来、喜悦、悲伤和幸福的认知表征（隐喻概念化）：抑郁在概念层面的认知扭曲
J Psycholinguist Res. 2015 Apr;44(2):159-85. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9286-6.
2
Semantic Distances in Depression: Relations Between ME and PAST, FUTURE, JOY, SADNESS, HAPPINESS.抑郁症中的语义距离：现在与过去、未来、喜悦、悲伤、幸福之间的关系。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Apr;46(2):345-366. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9442-2.
3
[The understanding of metaphors in schizophrenia and depression. An experimental approach].[精神分裂症和抑郁症中隐喻的理解。一种实验方法]
Encephale. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6 Pt 1):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76279-0.
4
Neurocognitive processing of emotion facial expressions in individuals with self-reported depressive symptoms: the role of personality and anxiety.自我报告有抑郁症状个体对情绪面部表情的神经认知加工：人格与焦虑的作用
Neurophysiol Clin. 2014 Nov;44(5):447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
Cognition and emotion: on paradigms and metaphors.认知与情感：范式与隐喻
Cogn Emot. 2019 Feb;33(1):85-93. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1567464. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
The course of social cognitive and metacognitive ability in depression: Deficit are only partially normalized after full remission of first episode major depression.抑郁症中社会认知和元认知能力的病程：首次发作的重度抑郁症完全缓解后，缺陷仅部分恢复正常。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2016 Sep;55(3):269-86. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12097. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
Cognitive Behavioral Performance of Untreated Depressed Patients with Mild Depressive Symptoms.未治疗的轻度抑郁症状抑郁症患者的认知行为表现
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146356. eCollection 2016.
8
The contribution of metaphor and metonymy to delusions.隐喻和转喻对妄想的作用。
Psychol Psychother. 2004 Mar;77(Pt 1):1-17. doi: 10.1348/147608304322874227.
9
Metaphor, meaning and psychiatry.隐喻、意义与精神病学。
Australas Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;16(6):391-6. doi: 10.1080/10398560801995285.
10
On learning to draw the distinction between physical and metaphorical motion: is metaphor an early emerging cognitive and linguistic capacity?关于学会区分物理运动和隐喻运动：隐喻是一种早期出现的认知和语言能力吗？
J Child Lang. 2005 May;32(2):291-318.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Patients With Depression Prefer Literal or Metaphorical Expressions for Internal States? Evidence From Sentence Completion and Elicited Production.抑郁症患者对内心情态更倾向于直白表达还是隐喻表达？来自句子完成任务和引发式产出的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 15;9:1326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01326. eCollection 2018.
2
Neural Correlates of Outcome of the Psychotherapy Compared to Antidepressant Therapy in Anxiety and Depression Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.焦虑症和抑郁症中心理治疗与抗抑郁药物治疗效果的神经关联：一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 7;8:927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00927. eCollection 2017.
3
Early Maladaptive Schemas and Cognitive Distortions in Adults with Morbid Obesity: Relationships with Mental Health Status.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Suppression and Enhancement in Understanding Metaphors.抑制与增强在理解隐喻中的作用。
J Mem Lang. 2001 Oct 1;45(3):433-450. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2782.
2
Rumination and impaired resource allocation in depression.抑郁中的反刍思维和资源分配受损。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Nov;118(4):757-66. doi: 10.1037/a0017206.
3
[Cognitive functions and depression].[认知功能与抑郁症]
患有病态肥胖症的成年人的早期适应不良图式与认知扭曲：与心理健康状况的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Feb 28;7(1):10. doi: 10.3390/bs7010010.
4
Semantic Distances in Depression: Relations Between ME and PAST, FUTURE, JOY, SADNESS, HAPPINESS.抑郁症中的语义距离：现在与过去、未来、喜悦、悲伤、幸福之间的关系。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Apr;46(2):345-366. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9442-2.
Psychiatr Pol. 2009 Jan-Feb;43(1):31-40.
4
Time perception, depression and sadness.时间感知、抑郁与悲伤。
Behav Processes. 2009 Feb;80(2):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.012. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
Evaluation of time memory in acutely depressed patients, manic patients, and healthy controls using a time reproduction task.使用时间再现任务对急性抑郁症患者、躁狂症患者和健康对照者的时间记忆进行评估。
Eur Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;23(6):430-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.07.001. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
6
Identifying differences in biased affective information processing in major depression.识别重度抑郁症中偏向性情感信息处理的差异。
Psychiatry Res. 2008 May 30;159(1-2):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.011. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
7
Updating the contents of working memory in depression: interference from irrelevant negative material.更新抑郁症中工作记忆的内容：来自无关负面材料的干扰。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Feb;117(1):182-92. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.1.182.
8
A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症患者情绪反应性的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;28(4):676-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
9
Early-emerging cognitive vulnerability to depression and the serotonin transporter promoter region polymorphism.抑郁症早期出现的认知易损性与血清素转运体启动子区域多态性
J Affect Disord. 2008 Apr;107(1-3):227-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
10
Altered emotional interference processing in affective and cognitive-control brain circuitry in major depression.重度抑郁症患者情感与认知控制脑回路中情感干扰处理的改变
Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Feb 15;63(4):377-84. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Aug 24.