Institute for the Environment, Brunel University , Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, United Kingdom.
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Mar 18;48(6):3100-11. doi: 10.1021/es4047507. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
We have become progressively more concerned about the quality of some published ecotoxicology research. Others have also expressed concern. It is not uncommon for basic, but extremely important, factors to apparently be ignored. For example, exposure concentrations in laboratory experiments are sometimes not measured, and hence there is no evidence that the test organisms were actually exposed to the test substance, let alone at the stated concentrations. To try to improve the quality of ecotoxicology research, we suggest 12 basic principles that should be considered, not at the point of publication of the results, but during the experimental design. These principles range from carefully considering essential aspects of experimental design through to accurately defining the exposure, as well as unbiased analysis and reporting of the results. Although not all principles will apply to all studies, we offer these principles in the hope that they will improve the quality of the science that is available to regulators. Science is an evidence-based discipline and it is important that we and the regulators can trust the evidence presented to us. Significant resources often have to be devoted to refuting the results of poor research when those resources could be utilized more effectively.
我们越来越关注一些已发表的生态毒理学研究的质量。其他人也对此表示关注。一些基本但极其重要的因素显然被忽视,这种情况并不罕见。例如,实验室实验中的暴露浓度有时未被测量,因此没有证据表明测试生物实际上接触了测试物质,更不用说在规定的浓度下了。为了提高生态毒理学研究的质量,我们建议在实验设计阶段考虑 12 个基本原理,而不是在结果发表时。这些原则从仔细考虑实验设计的基本方面到准确界定暴露,以及对结果进行无偏分析和报告,不一而足。虽然并非所有原则都适用于所有研究,但我们提出这些原则,希望能提高监管机构可用科学的质量。科学是一门基于证据的学科,我们和监管机构必须能够信任向我们提出的证据,这一点很重要。当这些资源可以更有效地利用时,往往需要投入大量资源来反驳研究结果不佳的情况。