• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项临床评估工具和流程的描述性研究:学生和教师的观点。

A descriptive study of a clinical evaluation tool and process: student and faculty perspectives.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2014 Mar;53(3):S30-3. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140211-02. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

DOI:10.3928/01484834-20140211-02
PMID:24512331
Abstract

Clinical evaluation tools are designed to assess nursing students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to program and course outcomes and professional nursing standards. Students, faculty, administrators, and the public rely on the effectiveness of the tool and process to determine progression within the curriculum and validate competency. In May 2012, a revised clinical evaluation tool was implemented in a baccalaureate nursing program. This study was undertaken to evaluate the revised clinical evaluation tool by exploring the perspectives of students and faculty who use the tool and engage in the evaluation process. Findings revealed the tool was user friendly and instructions were clear, with sufficient grading criteria to determine clinical competency. Findings also revealed areas for improvement in the evaluation process, including orientation to the tool, connecting program outcomes to clinical performance, and meaningful participation in evaluation. Recommendations are made for improving the clinical evaluation process.

摘要

临床评估工具旨在评估护理学生与课程和专业护理标准相关的知识、技能和态度。学生、教师、管理人员和公众依赖于工具和流程的有效性来确定课程中的进展并验证能力。2012 年 5 月,在一个学士学位护理课程中实施了修订后的临床评估工具。本研究旨在通过探索使用该工具和参与评估过程的学生和教师的观点来评估修订后的临床评估工具。研究结果表明,该工具易于使用,说明清晰,有足够的评分标准来确定临床能力。研究结果还揭示了评估过程中需要改进的地方,包括对工具的熟悉、将课程成果与临床表现联系起来以及有意义地参与评估。为改进临床评估流程提出了建议。

相似文献

1
A descriptive study of a clinical evaluation tool and process: student and faculty perspectives.一项临床评估工具和流程的描述性研究:学生和教师的观点。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Mar;53(3):S30-3. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140211-02. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
2
A comparative study of cultural competence curricula in baccalaureate nursing programs.学士学位护理项目中文化能力课程的比较研究。
Nurse Educ. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):193-8. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000040.
3
Challenges and benefits of international clinical placements in public health nursing.公共卫生护理国际临床实习的挑战与益处
Nurse Educ. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):35-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000299493.00249.2d.
4
Nursing students and teaching of codes of ethics: an empirical research study.护理专业学生与伦理学规范教学:一项实证研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Dec;56(4):483-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00748.x.
5
An evaluation of a collaborative approach to the assessment of competence among nursing students of three universities in Ireland.对爱尔兰三所大学护理专业学生能力评估合作方法的评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jul;29(5):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.11.014. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
6
Answering Student Questions During Examinations: A Descriptive Study of Faculty Beliefs.考试期间回答学生问题:对教师观念的描述性研究
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):168-70.
7
Righting writing: strategies for improving nursing student papers.纠正写作:提高护生论文质量的策略
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article8. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1964. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
8
Developing a practical evaluation tool for preceptor use.开发一种供带教老师使用的实用评估工具。
Nurse Educ. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):113-7. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000312185.43766.1e.
9
Supporting students' learning and professional development through the process of continuous assessment and mentorship.通过持续评估和指导过程支持学生的学习和专业发展。
Nurse Educ Today. 2000 Aug;20(6):463-74. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0458.
10
Use of anecdotal notes by clinical nursing faculty: a descriptive study.临床护理教师使用轶事记录:一项描述性研究。
J Nurs Educ. 2010 Mar;49(3):156-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090915-03. Epub 2010 Mar 5.