• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用计算机化的同伴提名工具检测小学早期的欺凌行为。

Detecting bullying in early elementary school with a computerized peer-nomination instrument.

机构信息

The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus University Medical Center.

Department of Sociology, University of Groningen.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun;26(2):628-41. doi: 10.1037/a0035571. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1037/a0035571
PMID:24512423
Abstract

In this study we describe the PEERS Measure, a computerized assessment instrument that takes an innovative approach to using the peer-nomination method to identify bullying among elementary school children in Grades 1-2. Its psychometric characteristics were measured in 4,017 children from 190 school classes. The intercorrelations between the peer-nomination scores showed congruence of the data (e.g., bullying and peer rejection r = .51, defending and prosocial behavior r = .71). Boys were more involved in bullying, more rejected, and less prosocial. As reports by different informants were used, correlations of peer-reported bullying with aggressive behavior reported by a child him- or herself (r = .37) or by a teacher (r = .42) were in the expected range. Good test-retest reliability as measured by the intraclass correlations (average: .72) further suggests that the instrument has good psychometric properties. In line with earlier research, lower maternal educational levels, younger maternal age, and lower household income were related to more bullying and victimization. Overall, our findings show that the instrument provides a reliable measure of peer relations, thus making the use of peer nominations feasible in early elementary school.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们描述了 PEERS 量表,这是一种计算机评估工具,它采用了创新的方法,利用同伴提名法来识别 1-2 年级小学生中的欺凌行为。它的心理测量学特征在 190 个班级的 4017 名儿童中进行了测量。同伴提名得分之间的相互关系表明数据的一致性(例如,欺凌和同伴拒绝的 r =.51,辩护和亲社会行为的 r =.71)。男孩更多地参与欺凌,更多地被拒绝,亲社会行为更少。由于使用了不同的报告者,同伴报告的欺凌行为与儿童自身(r =.37)或教师(r =.42)报告的攻击行为之间存在预期的相关性。通过组内相关系数(平均:.72)测量的良好重测信度进一步表明该工具具有良好的心理测量学特性。与早期研究一致,较低的母亲教育水平、较年轻的母亲年龄和较低的家庭收入与更多的欺凌和受害有关。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,该工具提供了一种可靠的同伴关系衡量标准,从而使在小学早期使用同伴提名成为可能。

相似文献

1
Detecting bullying in early elementary school with a computerized peer-nomination instrument.使用计算机化的同伴提名工具检测小学早期的欺凌行为。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun;26(2):628-41. doi: 10.1037/a0035571. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
2
Behind bullying and defending: same-sex and other-sex relations and their associations with acceptance and rejection.在欺凌和辩护背后:同性和异性关系及其与接纳和拒绝的关联。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Nov-Dec;39(6):462-71. doi: 10.1002/ab.21495. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
3
Psychometric properties of the Peer Interactions in Primary School (PIPS) Questionnaire.小学同伴互动(PIPS)问卷的心理测量学特性。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007 Apr;28(2):125-32. doi: 10.1097/01.DBP.0000267562.11329.8f.
4
Teacher and peer reports of overweight and bullying among young primary school children.教师和同伴报告的小学生超重和受欺负情况。
Pediatrics. 2014 Sep;134(3):473-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3274.
5
Gender differences in the assessment, stability, and correlates to bullying roles in middle school children.性别差异在中学儿童欺凌角色的评估、稳定性和相关性方面的研究。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):677-94. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1000. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
6
Development of a measure of the experience of being bullied in youth.青少年被欺凌经历量表的编制。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):156-65. doi: 10.1037/a0025178. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
7
Student-, classroom-, and school-level risk factors for victimization.学生层面、课堂层面和学校层面的受害风险因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Jun;51(3):421-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
Bystanders matter: associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms.旁观者很重要:强化、防御与课堂中欺凌行为频率的关系。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(5):668-76. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.597090.
9
Effect of prosocial behavior on school bullying victimization among children and adolescents: Peer and student-teacher relationships as mediators.亲社会行为对儿童和青少年校园欺凌受害情况的影响:以同伴关系和师生关系作为中介变量
J Adolesc. 2023 Feb;95(2):322-335. doi: 10.1002/jad.12116. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Disability, poverty, and other risk factors associated with involvement in bullying behaviors.残疾、贫困和其他与欺凌行为相关的风险因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Feb;78:115-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Intergenerational transmission of psychopathology across three generations: the role of social support.三代人之间精神病理学的代际传递:社会支持的作用。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;34(4):1329-1340. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02562-z. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
Associations of bullying perpetration and peer victimization subtypes with preadolescent's suicidality, non-suicidal self-injury, neurocognition, and brain development.欺负行为和同伴受害亚型与青春期前自杀意念、非自杀性自伤、神经认知和大脑发育的关联。
BMC Med. 2023 Apr 12;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02808-8.
3
The Anatomy of Friendship: Neuroanatomic Homophily of the Social Brain among Classroom Friends.
《友谊的解剖:课堂朋友间社会大脑的神经解剖同质性》。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Jul 12;32(14):3031-3041. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab398.
4
Connecting the dots: social networks in the classroom and white matter connections in the brain.连接点:课堂中的社交网络与大脑中的白质连接。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;63(12):1622-1630. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13647. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
5
Children's autistic traits and peer relationships: do non-verbal IQ and externalizing problems play a role?儿童的自闭症特质与同伴关系:非言语智商和外化问题起作用吗?
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021 Nov 22;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00421-2.
6
Peer-reported bullying, rejection and hallucinatory experiences in childhood.同伴报告的欺凌、排斥和幻觉体验在儿童时期。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Jun;143(6):503-512. doi: 10.1111/acps.13282. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
7
Peer Victimisation in Early Childhood; Observations of Participant Roles and Sex Differences.幼儿期的同伴侵害;参与者角色和性别差异的观察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;18(2):415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020415.
8
Reward Responsiveness, Optimism, and Social and Mental Functioning in Children Aged 6-7: Protocol of a Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.6至7岁儿童的奖励反应性、乐观主义与社会及心理功能:一项横断面试点研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):e18902. doi: 10.2196/18902.
9
Frequent Bullying Involvement and Brain Morphology in Children.儿童频繁遭受欺凌与大脑形态学
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 24;10:696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00696. eCollection 2019.
10
Who victimizes whom and who defends whom? A multivariate social network analysis of victimization, aggression, and defending in early childhood.谁伤害了谁,谁又保护了谁?对幼儿期受害、攻击和保护行为的多变量社会网络分析。
Aggress Behav. 2018 Jul;44(4):394-405. doi: 10.1002/ab.21760. Epub 2018 Mar 25.