• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极和消极情绪的个体内与个体间因素结构差异:使用多层次结构方程模型对两项密集测量研究的分析

Differences in within- and between-person factor structure of positive and negative affect: analysis of two intensive measurement studies using multilevel structural equation modeling.

作者信息

Rush Jonathan, Hofer Scott M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Victoria.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun;26(2):462-73. doi: 10.1037/a0035666. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1037/a0035666
PMID:24512426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4681324/
Abstract

The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a widely used measure of emotional experience. The factor structure of the PANAS has been examined predominantly with cross-sectional designs, which fails to disaggregate within-person variation from between-person differences. There is still uncertainty as to the factor structure of positive and negative affect and whether they constitute 2 distinct independent factors. The present study examined the within-person and between-person factor structure of the PANAS in 2 independent samples that reported daily affect over 7 and 14 occasions, respectively. Results from multilevel confirmatory factor analyses revealed that a 2-factor structure at both the within-person and between-person levels, with correlated specific factors for overlapping items, provided good model fit. The best-fitting solution was one where within-person factors of positive and negative affect were inversely correlated, but between-person factors were independent. The structure was further validated through multilevel structural equation modeling examining the effects of cognitive interference, daily stress, physical symptoms, and physical activity on positive and negative affect factors.

摘要

积极和消极情绪量表(PANAS)是一种广泛使用的情绪体验测量工具。PANAS的因子结构主要通过横断面设计进行检验,这种设计无法区分个体内部变异和个体间差异。关于积极和消极情绪的因子结构以及它们是否构成两个不同的独立因子,仍然存在不确定性。本研究在两个独立样本中检验了PANAS的个体内部和个体间因子结构,这两个样本分别在7次和14次场合报告了每日情绪。多层次验证性因子分析结果显示,在个体内部和个体间水平上均为双因子结构,重叠项目具有相关的特定因子,模型拟合良好。最佳拟合解是积极和消极情绪的个体内部因子呈负相关,但个体间因子是独立的。通过多层次结构方程模型进一步验证了该结构,该模型检验了认知干扰、日常压力、身体症状和身体活动对积极和消极情绪因子影响。

相似文献

1
Differences in within- and between-person factor structure of positive and negative affect: analysis of two intensive measurement studies using multilevel structural equation modeling.积极和消极情绪的个体内与个体间因素结构差异:使用多层次结构方程模型对两项密集测量研究的分析
Psychol Assess. 2014 Jun;26(2):462-73. doi: 10.1037/a0035666. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
2
Examining the within- and between-person structure of a short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: A multilevel and dynamic approach.探讨正性负性情绪量表短式的个体内和个体间结构:多层次和动态方法。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Dec;34(12):1126-1137. doi: 10.1037/pas0001167. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
3
Measuring affect in daily life: A multilevel psychometric evaluation of the PANAS-X across four ecological momentary assessment samples.在日常生活中测量情感: PANAS-X 在四个生态瞬间评估样本中的多级心理测量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Jun;35(6):469-483. doi: 10.1037/pas0001231. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
4
Factor Structure of the PANAS With Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling in a Chinese Sample.中国样本中采用贝叶斯结构方程模型的积极和消极情绪量表的因子结构
Eval Health Prof. 2022 Jun;45(2):157-167. doi: 10.1177/0163278721996794. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample.积极和消极情绪量表(PANAS):大型非临床样本中的结构效度、测量特性及常模数据
Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Sep;43(Pt 3):245-65. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934.
6
Dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in adolescents and young adults.青少年和青年成人中西班牙语版积极和消极情绪量表(PANAS)的维度结构。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):e1-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000107. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
7
Validation of Pictorial Mood Assessment with Ottawa Mood Scales and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Young Adults.图片情绪评估与渥太华情绪量表和年轻人正负面情绪量表的验证。
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Apr;57(3):529-539. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00679-4. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
Affectivity in danish patients with emotional disorders: assessing the validity of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS).丹麦情感障碍患者的情感:评估正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)的有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05450-z.
9
Factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in adult women with fibromyalgia from Southern Spain: the al-Ándalus project.西班牙南部患有纤维肌痛的成年女性中正负性情绪量表(PANAS)的因子结构:安达卢西亚项目
PeerJ. 2016 Mar 24;4:e1822. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1822. eCollection 2016.
10
Chinese version of the international positive and negative affect schedule short form: factor structure and measurement invariance.中文简体版国际正负面情感量表短式:因子结构和测量不变性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Aug 24;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01526-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interrelations between daily stress processes and Big Five personality trait changes over 20 years.20年间日常压力过程与大五人格特质变化之间的相互关系。
Psychol Aging. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1037/pag0000912.
2
Psychometric evaluation of a Visual Interpersonal Analog Scale.视觉人际类比量表的心理计量学评估。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Apr;35(4):311-324. doi: 10.1037/pas0001210. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Positive Affective Recovery in Daily Life as a Momentary Mechanism Across Subclinical and Clinical Stages of Mental Disorder: Experience Sampling Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error.学校情境效应的双重潜在模型:整合多层次和结构方程方法以控制测量和抽样误差。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 Nov 30;44(6):764-802. doi: 10.1080/00273170903333665.
2
Modeling Individual Differences in Within-Person Variation of Negative and Positive Affect in a Mixed Effects Location Scale Model Using BUGS/JAGS.在使用BUGS/JAGS的混合效应位置量表模型中对消极和积极情绪的个体内变异中的个体差异进行建模。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Mar 30;47(2):177-200. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.658328.
3
日常生活中的积极情感恢复作为跨越精神障碍亚临床和临床阶段的瞬时机制:经验抽样研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Nov 23;9(11):e37394. doi: 10.2196/37394.
4
Variability in intensively assessed mood: Systematic sources and factor structure in outpatients with opioid use disorder.密集评估情绪的变异性:门诊阿片类药物使用障碍患者的系统来源和因子结构。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Oct;34(10):966-977. doi: 10.1037/pas0001160. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
5
Why Do Students Procrastinate More in Some Courses Than in Others and What Happens Next? Expanding the Multilevel Perspective on Procrastination.为什么学生在某些课程中比在其他课程中更容易拖延,接下来会发生什么?拓展对拖延的多层次视角。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 14;12:786249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.786249. eCollection 2021.
6
Effects of chronic ethnic discrimination in the daily life of Turkish immigrants living in Austria: study protocol of a 30-day ambulatory assessment study.生活在奥地利的土耳其移民日常经历中的慢性种族歧视影响:一项为期 30 天的动态评估研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 7;11(10):e046697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046697.
7
A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity.一种现代网络方法重新探讨正性负性情感量表(PANAS)的建构效度。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Oct;77(10):2370-2404. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23191. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
8
Intensive longitudinal methods for studying the role of self-regulation strategies in substance use behavior change.用于研究自我调节策略在物质使用行为改变中作用的密集纵向研究方法。
Curr Addict Rep. 2020 Sep;7(3):301-316. doi: 10.1007/s40429-020-00329-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Multigroup multilevel structure of the child and parent versions of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in adolescents with and without ADHD.多动障碍(ADHD)患儿及其父母正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)的多组多层次结构。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Apr;32(4):374-382. doi: 10.1037/pas0000796. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
10
Partitioning the Variability of Daily Emotion Dynamics in Dyadic Interactions with a Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model.使用混合效应位置尺度模型对二元互动中日常情绪动态的变异性进行划分。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Jun;15:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 21.
Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework.
多层次验证性因素分析框架中的可靠性估计。
Psychol Methods. 2014 Mar;19(1):72-91. doi: 10.1037/a0032138. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
5
The positivity scale.阳性量表。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):701-12. doi: 10.1037/a0026681. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
6
Don't worry, be active: positive affect and habitual physical activity.别担心,要积极:积极情绪与习惯性身体活动。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;45(12):1047-52. doi: 10.3109/00048674.2011.621063. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
7
A time-lagged momentary assessment study on daily life physical activity and affect.日常生活体力活动与情绪的时滞瞬间评估研究。
Health Psychol. 2012 Mar;31(2):135-44. doi: 10.1037/a0025688. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
8
Intraindividual coupling of daily stressors and cognitive interference in old age.个体内的日常压力源与老年认知干扰的耦合。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Jul;66 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i121-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr012.
9
Modeling trait and state variation using multilevel factor analysis with PANAS daily diary data.使用多水平因素分析和积极与消极情绪量表每日日记数据对特质和状态变异进行建模。
J Res Pers. 2011 Feb 1;45(1):2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.003.
10
The PANAS structure revisited: on the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples.重新审视 PANAS 结构:在社区和法医样本中双因素模型的有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Mar;23(1):215-25. doi: 10.1037/a0021400.