Cheskes Sheldon, Schmicker Robert H, Verbeek P Richard, Salcido David D, Brown Siobhan P, Brooks Steven, Menegazzi James J, Vaillancourt Christian, Powell Judy, May Susanne, Berg Robert A, Sell Rebecca, Idris Ahamed, Kampp Mike, Schmidt Terri, Christenson Jim
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
Previous research has demonstrated significant relationships between peri-shock pause and survival to discharge from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest (OHCA).
To determine the impact of peri-shock pause on survival from OHCA during the ROC PRIMED randomized controlled trial.
We included patients in the ROC PRIMED trial who suffered OHCA between June 2007 and November 2009, presented with a shockable rhythm and had CPR process data for at least one shock. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association between peri-shock pause duration and survival to hospital discharge.
Among 2006 patients studied, the median (IQR) shock pause duration was: pre-shock pause 15s (8, 22); post-shock pause 6s (4, 9); and peri-shock pause 22.0 s (14, 31). After adjusting for Utstein predictors of survival as well as CPR quality measures, the odds of survival to hospital discharge were significantly higher for patients with pre-shock pause <10s (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.11) and peri-shock pause <20s (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.17, 2.85) when compared to patients with pre-shock pause ≥ 20s and peri-shock pause ≥ 40s. Post-shock pause was not significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge. Results for neurologically intact survival (Modified Rankin Score ≤ 3) were similar to our primary outcome.
In patients with cardiac arrest presenting in a shockable rhythm during the ROC PRIMED trial, shorter pre- and peri-shock pauses were significantly associated with higher odds of survival. Future cardiopulmonary education and technology should focus on minimizing all peri-shock pauses.
先前的研究表明,院外可电击心律心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的电击前后间歇与出院生存率之间存在显著关联。
在ROC PRIMED随机对照试验中,确定电击前后间歇对OHCA患者生存率的影响。
我们纳入了2007年6月至2009年11月期间发生OHCA、呈现可电击心律且至少有一次电击的心肺复苏过程数据的ROC PRIMED试验患者。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定电击前后间歇持续时间与出院生存率之间的关联。
在研究的2006例患者中,电击前间歇的中位数(IQR)为15秒(8,22);电击后间歇为6秒(4,9);电击前后间歇为22.0秒(14,31)。在调整了Utstein生存预测因素以及心肺复苏质量指标后,与电击前间歇≥20秒和电击前后间歇≥40秒的患者相比,电击前间歇<10秒(OR:1.52,95%CI:1.09,2.11)和电击前后间歇<20秒(OR:1.82,95%CI:1.17,2.85)的患者出院生存率显著更高。电击后间歇与出院生存率无显著关联。神经功能完好生存(改良Rankin评分≤3)的结果与我们的主要结局相似。
在ROC PRIMED试验中,呈现可电击心律的心脏骤停患者中,较短的电击前和电击前后间歇与较高的生存几率显著相关。未来的心肺复苏教育和技术应侧重于尽量缩短所有电击前后间歇。