Brubaker Linda, Nager Charles W, Richter Holly E, Visco Anthony, Nygaard Ingrid, Barber Matthew D, Schaffer Joseph, Meikle Susan, Wallace Dennis, Shibata Noriko, Wolfe Alan J
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S. First Avenue, Boulevard 120, Room 420, Maywood, IL, 60153, USA,
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Sep;25(9):1179-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2325-2. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
This study's aims were to detect and quantify bacterial DNA in the urine of randomized trial participants about to undergo treatment for urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) without clinical evidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and to determine if the presence of bacterial DNA in baseline urine relates to either baseline urinary symptoms or UTI risk after urinary tract instrumentation.
Women without clinical evidence of baseline UTI were randomized to cystoscopic onabotulinum toxin A injection and oral placebo medication versus cystoscopic placebo injection and active oral medication. Bacterial DNA in participants' catheterized urine was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Bacterial DNA was detected in the urine of 38.7 % of participants (60 out of 155). In these 60 qPCR-positive participants, baseline daily UUI episodes were greater than in the 95 qPCR-negative participants (5.71 [±2.60] vs 4.72 [±2.86], p = 0.004). Neither symptom severity by questionnaire nor treatment outcome was associated with qPCR status or with qPCR level in qPCR-positive subjects. In contrast, the presence of urinary bacterial DNA was associated with UTI risk: only 10 % of the qPCR-positive women developed a UTI post-treatment, while 24 % of the qPCR-negative women did so. The median qPCR level for qPCR-positive samples did not differ significantly by UTI status (UTI 2.58 × 10(5) vs no UTI 1.35 × 10(5) copies/mL, p = 0.6).
These results may indicate a urinary bacterial contribution to both baseline UUI and the risk of post-treatment UTI.
本研究旨在检测并量化即将接受尿急失禁(UUI)治疗但无尿路感染(UTI)临床证据的随机试验参与者尿液中的细菌DNA,并确定基线尿液中细菌DNA的存在是否与基线尿路症状或尿路器械检查后的UTI风险相关。
无基线UTI临床证据的女性被随机分为膀胱镜注射A型肉毒杆菌毒素和口服安慰剂组,以及膀胱镜注射安慰剂和口服活性药物组。通过定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)测量参与者导尿尿液中的细菌DNA。
38.7%的参与者(155人中的60人)尿液中检测到细菌DNA。在这60名qPCR阳性参与者中,基线每日UUI发作次数多于95名qPCR阴性参与者(5.71[±2.60]对4.72[±2.86],p = 0.004)。通过问卷评估的症状严重程度和治疗结果均与qPCR状态或qPCR阳性受试者的qPCR水平无关。相比之下,尿液细菌DNA的存在与UTI风险相关:qPCR阳性女性中只有10%在治疗后发生UTI,而qPCR阴性女性中有24%发生UTI。qPCR阳性样本的qPCR水平中位数在UTI状态方面无显著差异(UTI为2.58×10⁵对无UTI为1.35×10⁵拷贝/毫升,p = 0.6)。
这些结果可能表明尿液细菌对基线UUI和治疗后UTI风险均有影响。