Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
J Nucl Med. 2014 Mar;55(3):392-5. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.128173. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
(18)F-FDG PET/CT is of value in the diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection, but potential pitfalls related to tracer uptake in noninfected implants have been described. The current study assesses the incidence and patterns of (18)F-FDG uptake over time in noninfected grafts, in relationship to prosthetic material and location.
A 12-y PET/CT database was retrospectively searched for cancer patients with prosthetic vascular grafts. Data retrieved from patient files included graft location, material, and time from surgery. Images were reviewed by 2 nuclear medicine physicians in consensus, with the presence and patterns (focal, diffuse homogeneous, inhomogeneous) of increased (18)F-FDG uptake in grafts recorded. The mean standardized uptake value in grafts (SUV-G) and mediastinum (SUV-M) was measured. The ratio of SUV-G to SUV-M (SUV-G/SUV-M) was calculated for each graft.
One hundred seven prostheses were identified in 102 studies in 43 cancer patients. Sixty-seven prostheses were made of Dacron, 33 of Gore-Tex, and 7 were native veins. No increased (18)F-FDG uptake was found in 9 grafts (native veins, 4; Gore-Tex, 3; Dacron, 2). There was diffuse homogeneous uptake in 68 and inhomogeneous uptake in 30 grafts. The homogeneous pattern was more prevalent in Gore-Tex whereas the inhomogeneous uptake was seen more in Dacron vascular grafts. None of the grafts demonstrated focal uptake. The SUV-G range was 0.4-6.3 (average, 1.9), and SUV-M range was 0.6-2.4 (average, 1.4). The intensity of uptake was significantly higher in Dacron (SUV-G = 2.35 and SUV-G/SUV-M = 1.72) than in Gore-Tex (SUV-G = 1.09, SUV-G/SUV-M = 0.91) and native vein grafts (SUV-G = 1.07, SUV-G/SUV-M = 0.75) (P < 0.005). Native vein grafts showed a significant decrease in (18)F-FDG uptake over time whereas synthetic grafts showed no change in intensity for a follow-up of up to 16 y.
Diffuse (18)F-FDG uptake was found in 92% of noninfected vascular prostheses, more in Dacron grafts than with other materials. The intensity of (18)F-FDG uptake of synthetic grafts did not change over time. With knowledge of the presence, patterns, and persistence of (18)F-FDG uptake in noninfected vascular prostheses, misinterpretation of PET/CT studies in patients referred for suspected prosthetic infection and in those assessed for diseases unrelated to their graft status can be avoided.
(18)F-FDG PET/CT 对诊断人造血管移植物感染有价值,但已描述了与非感染植入物摄取示踪剂相关的潜在陷阱。本研究评估了非感染移植物中(18)F-FDG 摄取随时间的变化模式,以及与移植物材料和位置的关系。
回顾性搜索了有人造血管移植物的癌症患者的 12 年 PET/CT 数据库。从患者档案中检索到的数据包括移植物的位置、材料和手术时间。由 2 名核医学医师进行共识审查,记录移植物中(18)F-FDG 摄取的存在和模式(局灶性、弥漫性均匀、不均匀)。测量移植物(SUV-G)和纵隔(SUV-M)的标准化摄取值。计算每个移植物的 SUV-G 与 SUV-M 的比值(SUV-G/SUV-M)。
在 43 例癌症患者的 102 项研究中,共发现 107 个假体。67 个假体由 Dacron 制成,33 个由 Gore-Tex 制成,7 个为天然静脉。9 个移植物(7 个为天然静脉,2 个为 Gore-Tex,2 个为 Dacron)未发现(18)F-FDG 摄取增加。68 个移植物呈弥漫性均匀摄取,30 个移植物呈不均匀摄取。均匀模式在 Gore-Tex 中更为常见,而不均匀摄取在 Dacron 血管移植物中更为常见。没有一个移植物显示局灶性摄取。SUV-G 范围为 0.4-6.3(平均值 1.9),SUV-M 范围为 0.6-2.4(平均值 1.4)。Dacron(SUV-G = 2.35 和 SUV-G/SUV-M = 1.72)的摄取强度明显高于 Gore-Tex(SUV-G = 1.09,SUV-G/SUV-M = 0.91)和天然静脉移植物(SUV-G = 1.07,SUV-G/SUV-M = 0.75)(P < 0.005)。天然静脉移植物在随访 16 年期间(18)F-FDG 摄取显著减少,而合成移植物在 16 年的随访中摄取强度没有变化。
92%的非感染血管假体中发现弥漫性(18)F-FDG 摄取,Dacron 移植物摄取比其他材料更明显。合成移植物的(18)F-FDG 摄取强度随时间无变化。了解非感染性血管假体中(18)F-FDG 摄取的存在、模式和持续性,可以避免对怀疑感染人造物的患者和评估与移植物状态无关疾病的患者的 PET/CT 研究进行错误解释。