*Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; †Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco," Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy; ‡Division of Anatomic Pathology, Gemelli Hospital and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; §Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and ‖Division of Anatomic Pathology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital and University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Mar;9(3):273-84. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000092.
Classification of lung neuroendocrine (NE) tumors is a step-wise process with four tumor categories being identified by morphology, namely typical carcinoid (TC), atypical carcinoid, large-cell NE carcinoma, and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Ki-67 antigen or protein (henceforth simply Ki-67) has been largely studied in these tumors, but the clinical implications are so far not clear. A well-defined role has regarded the diagnostic use in the separation of TC and AC from SCLC in nonsurgical specimens, with monoclonal antibody MIB-1 resulting in the most used reagent after antigen retrieval procedures. Uncertainties, however, have arisen in its assessment, usually expressed as Ki-67 labeling index, because of some variability in obtaining either value of the fraction. A diagnostic role is currently lacking, even though there are significant differences in most cases between TC and AC, less so between large-cell NE carcinoma and SCLC. In addition, the prognostic role of Ki-67 is debated, likely due to methodological and biological reasons. The last challenge would be to identify an effective lung-specific grading system based on Ki-67 labeling index. In this review article, five relevant issues to Ki-67 have been addressed by using a question-answer methodology, with relevant key points discussing major interpretation issues. The conclusion is that Ki-67 is a feasible and potentially meaningful marker in lung NE tumors, but more data are needed to determine its ideal function in this setting of tumors.
肺神经内分泌(NE)肿瘤的分类是一个逐步的过程,通过形态学确定了四个肿瘤类别,分别为典型类癌(TC)、非典型类癌、大细胞 NE 癌和小细胞肺癌(SCLC)。Ki-67 抗原或蛋白(以下简称 Ki-67)在这些肿瘤中得到了广泛研究,但到目前为止其临床意义尚不清楚。一个明确的作用是在非手术标本中将 TC 和 AC 与 SCLC 分离时用于诊断,经过抗原修复程序后,单克隆抗体 MIB-1 成为最常用的试剂。然而,在评估中存在不确定性,通常以 Ki-67 标记指数表示,因为在获得分数的任何值时都存在一定的可变性。尽管 TC 和 AC 之间通常存在显著差异,而大细胞 NE 癌和 SCLC 之间的差异较小,但目前缺乏诊断作用。此外,Ki-67 的预后作用存在争议,可能是由于方法学和生物学原因。最后一个挑战是基于 Ki-67 标记指数来确定一种有效的肺特异性分级系统。在这篇综述文章中,采用问答方法探讨了与 Ki-67 相关的五个问题,讨论了主要的解释问题。结论是 Ki-67 是肺神经内分泌肿瘤中一种可行且具有潜在意义的标志物,但需要更多的数据来确定其在这种肿瘤环境中的理想功能。