Garty H, Benos D J
Department of Membrane Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Physiol Rev. 1988 Apr;68(2):309-73. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1988.68.2.309.
Studies of active Na+ transport across intact amphibian skin and bladder epithelia and, more recently, epithelial cells in culture have served as prototypes for understanding transport function in other experimentally less accessible epithelia such as renal tubules, lung, and sweat glands. Epithelia of diverse phylogenetic origin contain amiloride-blockable Na+ channels that are undoubtedly involved in the regulation of transepithelial Na+ transport and electrolyte homeostasis. With the advent of the techniques of tissue culture, patch clamp, isotope flux measurements in native vesicles and liposomes, and planar lipid bilayer reconstitution, it has now become possible for the first time to explore the functional operation and regulation of this widespread and important transport protein at the molecular level. Epithelial transport physiology has now reached a point where investigators can embark on studies concerning the cellular and molecular biology of epithelial Na+ channels. In our opinion, concentrated experimental efforts should be directed in three general areas. First, detailed kinetic information concerning the molecular mechanisms of Na+ movement through this channel is required. For example, it is necessary to elucidate the nature (i.e., site and location) of channel block by amiloride and structurally related compounds, the structural determinants of its ion selectivity, the voltage dependence of amiloride and ion blockage, and the minimal number of polypeptide subunits required for channel activity. The second area of study concerns the nature of the regulation of this ion channel. What are the mechanisms of channel regulation and, specifically, how does cAMP and aldosterone activate or recruit these Na+ channels? Does regulation occur at the level of channel synthesis, through posttranslational modifications, or via noncovalent interactions with small molecules or peptides? Third, we feel that the isolation and purification of the Na+ channel is important because it will eventually enable investigators to establish the molecular details of ion movement through individual channels, i.e., structural correlates of ion selectivity, binding and blockade by amiloride, and ion flow. The isolation of the Na+ channel will allow the development of molecular probes of the channel protein. These probes will be useful for immunocytochemical localization studies and, ultimately, will lead to sequencing and site-directed mutagenesis studies. Also, questions concerning the homology between Na+ channels found in different tissues and organisms as well as between the different modes of amiloride-sensitive transporters can be addressed.
对完整两栖动物皮肤和膀胱上皮,以及最近对培养中的上皮细胞进行的主动钠离子转运研究,已成为理解其他实验上较难研究的上皮(如肾小管、肺和汗腺)转运功能的原型。不同系统发生起源的上皮含有可被氨氯吡脒阻断的钠离子通道,这些通道无疑参与了跨上皮钠离子转运和电解质稳态的调节。随着组织培养、膜片钳、天然囊泡和脂质体中同位素通量测量以及平面脂质双分子层重组技术的出现,现在首次有可能在分子水平上探索这种广泛且重要的转运蛋白的功能运作和调节。上皮转运生理学目前已发展到研究人员可以着手进行有关上皮钠离子通道细胞和分子生物学研究的阶段。我们认为,集中的实验工作应指向三个总体领域。首先,需要有关钠离子通过该通道运动的分子机制的详细动力学信息。例如,有必要阐明氨氯吡脒和结构相关化合物对通道的阻断性质(即位点和位置)、其离子选择性的结构决定因素、氨氯吡脒和离子阻断的电压依赖性,以及通道活性所需的最少多肽亚基数量。第二个研究领域涉及该离子通道的调节性质。通道调节的机制是什么,具体而言,环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)和醛固酮如何激活或募集这些钠离子通道?调节是发生在通道合成水平、通过翻译后修饰,还是通过与小分子或肽的非共价相互作用?第三,我们认为钠离子通道的分离和纯化很重要,因为这最终将使研究人员能够确定离子通过单个通道运动的分子细节,即离子选择性、氨氯吡脒的结合和阻断以及离子流动的结构关联。钠离子通道的分离将允许开发通道蛋白的分子探针。这些探针将有助于免疫细胞化学定位研究,并最终导致测序和定点诱变研究。此外,还可以解决有关在不同组织和生物体中发现的钠离子通道之间以及不同模式的氨氯吡脒敏感转运体之间的同源性问题。