Amsterdam Institute for Global Health & Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Feb 13;14:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-27.
Internet surveys that draw from traditionally generated samples provide the unique conditions to engage adolescents in exploration of sensitive health topics.
We examined awareness of unwanted pregnancy, abortion behaviour, methods, and attitudes toward specific legal indications for abortion via a school-based internet survey among 378 adolescents aged 12-21 years in three Rio de Janeiro public schools.
Forty-five percent knew peers who had undergone an abortion. Most students (66.0%) did not disclose abortion method knowledge. However, girls (aOR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4-7.2), those who had experienced their sexual debut (aOR1.76, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), and those attending a prestigious magnet school (aOR 2.7 95% CI 1.4-6.3) were more likely to report methods. Most abortion methods (79.3%) reported were ineffective, obsolete, and/or unsafe. Herbs (e.g. marijuana tea), over-the-counter medications, surgical procedures, foreign objects and blunt trauma were reported. Most techniques (85.2%) were perceived to be dangerous, including methods recommended by the World Health Organization. A majority (61.4%) supported Brazil's existing law permitting abortion in the case of rape. There was no association between gender, age, sexual debut, parental education or socioeconomic status and attitudes toward legal abortion. However, students at the magnet school supported twice as many legal indications (2.7, SE.27) suggesting a likely role of peers and/or educators in shaping abortion views.
Abortion knowledge and attitudes are not driven simply by age, religion or class, but rather a complex interplay that includes both social spaces and gender. Prevention of abortion morbidity and mortality among adolescents requires comprehensive sexuality and reproductive health education that includes factual distinctions between safe and unsafe abortion methods.
互联网调查可以从传统的抽样中获取独特的条件,使青少年能够探索敏感的健康话题。
我们通过在里约热内卢的三所公立学校开展基于学校的互联网调查,对 378 名 12-21 岁的青少年进行了关于意外怀孕、堕胎行为、方法以及对堕胎具体合法指征的态度的调查。
45%的人知道有同伴堕胎。大多数学生(66.0%)不会透露堕胎方法的知识。然而,女孩(aOR 4.2,95%CI 2.4-7.2)、有过性经历的人(aOR1.76,95%CI 1.1-3.0)和就读于知名磁石学校的学生(aOR 2.7,95%CI 1.4-6.3)更有可能报告方法。报告的大多数堕胎方法(79.3%)都无效、过时和/或不安全。草药(如大麻茶)、非处方药物、手术程序、异物和钝器伤都有报告。大多数技术(85.2%)被认为是危险的,包括世界卫生组织推荐的方法。大多数人(61.4%)支持巴西现有的允许在强奸案中堕胎的法律。性别、年龄、性经历、父母教育程度或社会经济地位与对合法堕胎的态度之间没有关联。然而,磁石学校的学生支持两倍多的合法指征(2.7,SE.27),这表明同伴和/或教育者在塑造堕胎观点方面可能发挥了作用。
堕胎知识和态度的形成不是简单地由年龄、宗教或阶级决定的,而是包括社会空间和性别在内的复杂相互作用的结果。要预防青少年堕胎的发病率和死亡率,就需要全面的性健康和生殖健康教育,包括对安全和不安全堕胎方法的事实区分。