Casini Beatrice, Buzzigoli Andrea, Cristina Maria Luisa, Spagnolo Anna Maria, Del Giudice Pietro, Brusaferro Silvio, Poscia Andrea, Moscato Umberto, Valentini Paola, Baggiani Angelo, Privitera Gaetano
Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;35(3):293-9. doi: 10.1086/675280. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Legionella control still remains a critical issue in healthcare settings where the preferred approach to health risk assessment and management is to develop a water safety plan. We report the experience of a university hospital, where a water safety plan has been applied since 2002, and the results obtained with the application of different methods for disinfecting hot water distribution systems in order to provide guidance for the management of water risk.
The disinfection procedures included continuous chlorination with chlorine dioxide (0.4-0.6 mg/L in recirculation loops) reinforced by endpoint filtration in critical areas and a water treatment based on monochloramine (2-3 mg/L). Real-time polymerase chain reaction and a new immunoseparation and adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence analysis were applied in environmental monitoring.
After 9 years, the integrated disinfection-filtration strategy significantly reduced positive sites by 55% and the mean count by 78% (P < .05); however, the high costs and the occurrence of a chlorine-tolerant clone belonging to Legionella pneumophila ST269 prompted us to test a new disinfectant. The shift to monochloramine allowed us to eliminate planktonic Legionella and did not require additional endpoint filtration; however, nontuberculous mycobacteria were isolated more frequently as long as the monochloramine concentration was 2 mg/L; their cultivability was never regained by increasing the concentration up to 3 mg/L.
Any disinfection method needs to be adjusted/fine-tuned in individual hospitals in order to maintain satisfactory results over time, and only a locally adapted evidence-based approach allows assessment of the efficacy and disadvantages of the control measures.
在医疗保健机构中,军团菌控制仍是一个关键问题,其中健康风险评估和管理的首选方法是制定水安全计划。我们报告了一家大学医院的经验,自2002年以来该医院已应用水安全计划,并报告了应用不同方法对热水分配系统进行消毒所取得的结果,以便为水风险的管理提供指导。
消毒程序包括在循环回路中用二氧化氯进行连续氯化(0.4 - 0.6毫克/升),在关键区域通过终端过滤加强,以及基于一氯胺(2 - 3毫克/升)的水处理。实时聚合酶链反应以及一种新的免疫分离和三磷酸腺苷生物发光分析被应用于环境监测。
9年后,综合消毒 - 过滤策略使阳性位点显著减少了55%,平均计数减少了78%(P < 0.05);然而,高成本以及出现属于嗜肺军团菌ST269的耐氯克隆促使我们测试一种新的消毒剂。改用一氯胺使我们能够消除浮游军团菌,并且不需要额外的终端过滤;然而,只要一氯胺浓度为2毫克/升,非结核分枝杆菌的分离频率就更高;将浓度提高到3毫克/升也未能恢复它们的可培养性。
任何消毒方法都需要在各个医院进行调整/微调,以便随着时间的推移保持令人满意的结果,并且只有基于当地情况的循证方法才能评估控制措施的有效性和缺点。