Lutsar Irja, Chazallon Corine, Carducci Francesca Ippolita Calò, Trafojer Ursula, Abdelkader Ben, de Cabre Vincent Meiffredy, Esposito Susanna, Giaquinto Carlo, Heath Paul T, Ilmoja Mari-Liis, Katragkou Aspasia, Lascoux Carine, Metsvaht Tuuli, Mitsiakos George, Netzer Emmanuelle, Pugni Lorenza, Roilides Emmanuel, Saidi Yacine, Sarafidis Kosmas, Sharland Mike, Usonis Vytautas, Aboulker Jean-Pierre
University and University Clinics of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia,
Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Aug;173(8):997-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2279-5. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
Late onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) has a high mortality and the optimal management is poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate new expert panel-derived criteria to define LOS and characterize the current management and antibiotic susceptibility of LOS-causing organisms in Europe. A prospective observational study enrolled infants aged 4 to 90 days in five European countries. Clinical and laboratory findings as well as empiric treatment were recorded and patients were followed until the end of antibiotic therapy. Failure was defined as a change of primary antibiotic, no resolution of clinical signs, appearance of new signs/pathogens or death. Antibiotic therapy was considered appropriate if the organism was susceptible to at least one empiric antibiotic. 113 infants (median age 14 days, 62 % ≤1500 g) were recruited; 61 % were culture proven cases (28 CoNS, 24 Enterobacteriaceae, 11 other Gram-positives and 6 Gram-negative non-fermentative organisms). The predictive value of the expert-panel criteria to identify patients with a culture proven LOS was 61 % (95 % CI 52 % to 70 %). Around one third of Enterobacteriaceae were resistant to ampicillin + or cefotaxime + gentamicin but only 10 % to meropenem. Empiric treatment contained a total of 43 different antibiotic regimens. All-cause mortality was 8 % with an additional 45 % classified as failure of empiric therapy, mainly due to change of primary antibiotics (42/60).
The expert panel-derived diagnostic criteria performed well identifying a high rate of culture proven sepsis. Current management of LOS in Europe is extremely variable suggesting an urgent need of evidence-based guidelines.
迟发性新生儿败血症(LOS)死亡率高,最佳治疗方案尚不明确。我们旨在评估专家小组制定的新标准,以界定LOS,并描述欧洲LOS致病微生物的当前治疗情况及抗生素敏感性。一项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了五个欧洲国家4至90日龄的婴儿。记录临床和实验室检查结果以及经验性治疗情况,并对患者进行随访直至抗生素治疗结束。治疗失败定义为更换一线抗生素、临床症状未缓解、出现新症状/病原体或死亡。如果微生物对至少一种经验性抗生素敏感,则认为抗生素治疗是合适的。共招募了113名婴儿(中位年龄14天,62%体重≤1500g);61%为血培养确诊病例(28例凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、24例肠杆菌科细菌、11例其他革兰氏阳性菌和6例革兰氏阴性非发酵菌)。专家小组标准识别血培养确诊LOS患者的预测价值为61%(95%CI 52%至70%)。约三分之一的肠杆菌科细菌对氨苄西林+或头孢噻肟+庆大霉素耐药,但仅10%对美罗培南耐药。经验性治疗总共包含43种不同的抗生素方案。全因死亡率为8%,另有45%被归类为经验性治疗失败,主要原因是更换一线抗生素(42/60)。
专家小组制定的诊断标准在识别高比例血培养确诊败血症方面表现良好。欧洲目前对LOS的治疗差异极大,表明迫切需要循证指南。