Bener Abdulbari, Dogan Muzeyyen, Barakat Lolwa, Al-Hamaq Abdulla O A A
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Doha, Qatar The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jul;5(3):180-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131914520991. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
The aim of the current study was to determine the efficacy of the 4 most commonly prescribed statins (rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) for managing dyslipidemia among diabetic patients with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS).
This was a cohort observational population-based study conducted at Hamad Medical Hospital and Primary Health Care Centre. The participants were 1542 consecutive diabetes patients who were diagnosed with dyslipidemia and were prescribed any of the indicated statins. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were taken from medical records, and lipid profile at baseline and 2 years after the initiation of statin therapy were retrieved from electronic medical records database (EMR-viewer). Reduction in different lipid profile after 2 years of therapy was compared among different types of statins between patients with and without MetS.
Out of total 1542 subjects, 562(36.4%) were diagnosed with MetS using the criteria of International Diabetes Federation. Among those with MetS, 125 were prescribed with atorvastatin, 162 pravastatin, 177 rosuvastatin, and 98 simvastatin. Among those without MetS, 365 used atorvastatin, 172 pravastatin, 345 rosuvastatin, and 98 simvastatin therapies. Among patients with MetS, rosuvastatin therapy resulted in significantly higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol reduction (23%, P = .006; and 20.3%, P = .015, respectively) as compared with other statins. Similarly, significantly higher percentage of patients receiving rosuvastatin therapy were successful in achieving the target of total cholesterol <4 mmol/L and triglycerides <1.7 mmol/L after 2 years (38.4%, P = .012; and 67.2%, P = .010, respectively) as compared with other therapies. In contrast, among patients without MetS, rosuvastatin therapy resulted in highest percentage drop in total cholesterol (20.1%; P = .016) than other statin therapies.
The present study confirmed that rosuvastatin therapy in commonly prescribed doses is the most effective statin for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement and for improving the lipid profile in hypercholesterolemic diabetic patients with and without MetS.
本研究旨在确定4种最常用的他汀类药物(瑞舒伐他汀、阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀和辛伐他汀)对合并或不合并代谢综合征(MetS)的糖尿病患者血脂异常的管理效果。
这是一项在哈马德医疗医院和初级卫生保健中心进行的基于队列的观察性人群研究。参与者为1542例连续的糖尿病患者,他们被诊断为血脂异常并被处方了任何一种指定的他汀类药物。社会人口统计学和临床特征取自病历,他汀类药物治疗开始时和2年后的血脂谱从电子病历数据库(EMR-viewer)中获取。比较了合并和不合并MetS的患者在不同类型他汀类药物治疗2年后不同血脂谱的降低情况。
在总共1542名受试者中,根据国际糖尿病联盟的标准,562例(36.4%)被诊断为MetS。在患有MetS的患者中,125例被处方阿托伐他汀,162例普伐他汀,177例瑞舒伐他汀,98例辛伐他汀。在没有MetS的患者中,365例使用阿托伐他汀,172例普伐他汀,345例瑞舒伐他汀,98例辛伐他汀治疗。在患有MetS的患者中,与其他他汀类药物相比,瑞舒伐他汀治疗导致低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和总胆固醇显著降低(分别为23%,P = 0.006;和20.3%,P = 0.015)。同样,与其他治疗相比,接受瑞舒伐他汀治疗的患者在2年后成功达到总胆固醇<4 mmol/L和甘油三酯<1.7 mmol/L目标的比例显著更高(分别为38.4%,P = 0.012;和67.2%,P = 0.010)。相比之下,在没有MetS的患者中,瑞舒伐他汀治疗导致总胆固醇下降百分比最高(20.1%;P = 0.016),高于其他他汀类药物治疗。
本研究证实,常用剂量的瑞舒伐他汀治疗是实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标以及改善合并或不合并MetS的高胆固醇血症糖尿病患者血脂谱最有效的他汀类药物。