• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺血性脑卒中患者的不复苏医嘱的变化:对国家医院比较的影响。

Variation in do-not-resuscitate orders for patients with ischemic stroke: implications for national hospital comparisons.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY (A.G.K., R.G.H.); and Stroke Program, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor (D.B.Z., L.B.M., J.F.B.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):822-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004573. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004573
PMID:24523035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3943476/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Decisions on life-sustaining treatments and the use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders can affect early mortality after stroke. We investigated the variation in early DNR use after stroke among hospitals in California and the effect of this variation on mortality-based hospital classifications.

METHODS

Using the California State Inpatient Database from 2005 to 2011, ischemic stroke admissions for patients aged≥50 years were identified. Cases were categorized by the presence or the absence of DNR orders within the first 24 hours of admission. Multilevel logistic regression models with a random hospital intercept were used to predict inpatient mortality after adjusting for comorbidities, vascular risk factors, and demographics. Hospital mortality rank order was assigned based on this model and compared with the results of a second model that included DNR status.

RESULTS

From 355 hospitals, 252,368 cases were identified, including 33,672 (13.3%) with early DNR. Hospital-level-adjusted use of DNR varied widely (quintile 1, 2.2% versus quintile 5, 23.2%). Hospitals with higher early DNR use had higher inpatient mortality because inpatient mortality more than doubled from quintile 1 (4.2%) to quintile 5 (8.7%). Failure to adjust for DNR orders resulted in substantial hospital reclassification across the rank spectrum, including among high mortality hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variation in the hospital-level proportion of ischemic stroke patients with early DNR orders; this variation affects hospital mortality estimates. Unless the circumstances of early DNR orders are better understood, mortality-based hospital comparisons may not reliably identify hospitals providing a lower quality of care.

摘要

背景与目的

对生命支持治疗的决策和使用“不复苏”(DNR)医嘱可能会影响中风后的早期死亡率。我们研究了加利福尼亚州各医院中风后早期使用 DNR 的差异,以及这种差异对基于死亡率的医院分类的影响。

方法

使用 2005 年至 2011 年加利福尼亚州住院患者数据库,确定年龄≥50 岁的缺血性中风入院患者。根据入院后 24 小时内是否存在 DNR 医嘱将病例分为有/无 DNR 医嘱两组。采用多水平逻辑回归模型,以医院随机截距为预测变量,调整合并症、血管风险因素和人口统计学因素后,预测住院死亡率。根据该模型对医院死亡率进行排序,并与包含 DNR 状态的第二个模型的结果进行比较。

结果

从 355 家医院中,共确定了 252368 例病例,其中 33672 例(13.3%)患者在早期使用了 DNR。医院层面 DNR 使用的调整后差异很大(五分位 1 为 2.2%,五分位 5 为 23.2%)。早期 DNR 使用较多的医院住院死亡率较高,因为住院死亡率从五分位 1(4.2%)到五分位 5(8.7%)增加了一倍以上。如果不调整 DNR 医嘱,就会导致整个等级范围内的医院大量重新分类,包括高死亡率医院。

结论

各医院缺血性中风患者早期使用 DNR 医嘱的比例存在很大差异;这种差异会影响医院死亡率的估计。除非更好地了解 DNR 医嘱的情况,否则基于死亡率的医院比较可能无法可靠地识别提供较低护理质量的医院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a1/3943476/95a67066fa13/nihms555408f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a1/3943476/f70c9f5055f2/nihms555408f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a1/3943476/95a67066fa13/nihms555408f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a1/3943476/f70c9f5055f2/nihms555408f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8a1/3943476/95a67066fa13/nihms555408f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Variation in do-not-resuscitate orders for patients with ischemic stroke: implications for national hospital comparisons.缺血性脑卒中患者的不复苏医嘱的变化:对国家医院比较的影响。
Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):822-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004573. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
2
Variation in Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Implications for Heart Failure Risk-Adjusted Hospital Mortality Metrics.不同的 不复苏医嘱与心力衰竭风险调整的医院死亡率指标的关系。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;5(10):743-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.07.010.
3
Do-Not-Resuscitate Status and Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission Rates Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后的“不要复苏”状态与风险标准化死亡率及再入院率
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005196. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005196.
4
Association of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Hospital Mortality Rate Among Patients With Pneumonia.“不要复苏”医嘱与肺炎患者医院死亡率的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):97-104. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6324.
5
Association of Early Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders with Unplanned Readmissions among Patients Hospitalized for Pneumonia.早期不复苏医嘱与肺炎住院患者计划性再入院的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jan;14(1):103-109. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-617OC.
6
Hospital Variation in Utilization of Life-Sustaining Treatments among Patients with Do Not Resuscitate Orders.患者带有“不复苏”医嘱时,医院在维持生命治疗上的使用的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1644-1661. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12651. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Hospital usage of early do-not-resuscitate orders and outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血后早期不进行心肺复苏医嘱的医院使用情况及预后
Stroke. 2004 May;35(5):1130-4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125858.71051.ca. Epub 2004 Mar 25.
8
Adjustment for do-not-resuscitate orders reverses the apparent in-hospital mortality advantage for minorities.对不要复苏医嘱进行调整后,少数族裔在院内死亡率方面看似存在的优势就消失了。
Am J Med. 2005 Apr;118(4):400-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.008.
9
Do-not-resuscitate orders, quality of care, and outcomes in veterans with acute ischemic stroke.不复苏指令、护理质量与急性缺血性脑卒中退伍军人的结局。
Neurology. 2012 Nov 6;79(19):1990-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735ced. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
Treatment Restrictions and the Risk of Death in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Intracerebral Hemorrhage.治疗限制与缺血性卒中和脑出血患者的死亡风险。
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2683-2689. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029788. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
An Update on Palliative Care in Neurocritical Care: Providing Goal‑Concordant Care in the Face of Prognostic Uncertainty.神经重症监护中的姑息治疗最新进展:面对预后不确定性时提供目标一致的护理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2023 Dec;25(12):517-529. doi: 10.1007/s11940-023-00778-z. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
2
Patient and hospital characteristics associated with do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate orders: a cross-sectional study based on the Taiwan stroke registry.与“不复苏/不插管”医嘱相关的患者和医院特征:基于台湾中风登记的一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Sep 15;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01257-7.
3
Medical management of cerebral edema in large hemispheric infarcts.大脑半球大面积梗死性脑水肿的药物治疗
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 4;13:857640. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.857640. eCollection 2022.
4
End-of-Life Care Decision-Making in Stroke.卒中患者临终护理决策
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 28;12:702833. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.702833. eCollection 2021.
5
Variability in Palliative Care Use after Intracerebral Hemorrhage at US Hospitals: A Multilevel Analysis.美国医院脑出血后姑息治疗使用的变异性:多层次分析。
Neuroepidemiology. 2019;53(1-2):84-92. doi: 10.1159/000500276. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
Time Trends in Race-Ethnic Differences in Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders After Stroke.中风后不复苏指令的种族-民族差异的时间趋势。
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1641-1647. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024460. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
7
Do-Not-Resuscitate Status and Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission Rates Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后的“不要复苏”状态与风险标准化死亡率及再入院率
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3):e005196. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005196.
8
Treatment restrictions in patients with severe stroke are associated with an increased risk of death.重症中风患者的治疗限制与死亡风险增加相关。
Eur Stroke J. 2017 Sep;2(3):244-249. doi: 10.1177/2396987317704546. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Different utilization of intensive care services (ICSs) for patients dying of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, a hospital-based survey.一项基于医院的调查:脑出血和缺血性卒中死亡患者重症监护服务的不同利用情况
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(8):e0017. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010017.
10
The association of neurologists with headache health care utilization and costs.神经病学家与头痛保健利用和费用的关联。
Neurology. 2018 Feb 6;90(6):e525-e533. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004925. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in health care, patient preferences, and high-quality decision making.医疗保健、患者偏好及高质量决策的差异。
JAMA. 2013 Jul 10;310(2):151-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.7835.
2
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2013年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
3
Do-not-resuscitate orders, quality of care, and outcomes in veterans with acute ischemic stroke.不复苏指令、护理质量与急性缺血性脑卒中退伍军人的结局。
Neurology. 2012 Nov 6;79(19):1990-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182735ced. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
4
Early stroke mortality, patient preferences, and the withdrawal of care bias.早期卒中死亡率、患者偏好和撤机治疗偏倚。
Neurology. 2012 Aug 28;79(9):941-4. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318266fc40.
5
Comparison of 30-day mortality models for profiling hospital performance in acute ischemic stroke with vs without adjustment for stroke severity.比较调整与未调整卒中严重程度的急性缺血性脑卒中医院绩效预后 30 天死亡率模型。
JAMA. 2012 Jul 18;308(3):257-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7870.
6
Outcomes after ischemic stroke for hospitals with and without Joint Commission-certified primary stroke centers.有无联合委员会认证的初级中风中心的医院的缺血性中风治疗结果。
Neurology. 2011 Jun 7;76(23):1976-82. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821e54f3. Epub 2011 May 4.
7
Why do patients agree to a "Do not resuscitate" or "Full code" order? Perspectives of medical inpatients.为什么患者会同意下达“不复苏”或“全面复苏”的医嘱?住院患者的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(6):582-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1616-2. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Hospital-level variation in mortality and rehospitalization for medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke.医疗保险急性缺血性脑卒中患者的死亡率和再住院率的医院水平差异。
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):159-66. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601831. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
9
Do-not-resuscitate orders and predictive models after intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血后的不复苏医嘱和预测模型。
Neurology. 2010 Aug 17;75(7):626-33. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ed9cc9. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
10
Development and validation of hospital "end-of-life" treatment intensity measures.医院“临终”治疗强度指标的制定与验证
Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1098-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181993191.