Suppr超能文献

患者带有“不复苏”医嘱时,医院在维持生命治疗上的使用的变化。

Hospital Variation in Utilization of Life-Sustaining Treatments among Patients with Do Not Resuscitate Orders.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, The Pulmonary Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1644-1661. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12651. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine between-hospital variation in interventions provided to patients with do not resuscitate (DNR) orders.

DATA SOURCES/SETTING: United States Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, California State Inpatient Database.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study including hospitalized patients aged 40 and older with potential indications for invasive treatments: in-hospital cardiac arrest (indication for CPR), acute respiratory failure (mechanical ventilation), acute renal failure (hemodialysis), septic shock (central venous catheterization), and palliative care. Hierarchical logistic regression to determine associations of hospital "early" DNR rates (DNR order placed within 24 hours of admission) with utilization of invasive interventions.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: California State Inpatient Database, year 2011.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Patients with DNR orders at high-DNR-rate hospitals were less likely to receive invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure or hemodialysis for acute renal failure, but more likely to receive palliative care than DNR patients at low-DNR-rate hospitals. Patients without DNR orders experienced similar rates of invasive interventions regardless of hospital DNR rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals vary widely in the scope of invasive or organ-supporting treatments provided to patients with DNR orders.

摘要

目的

确定有“不复苏”(DNR)医嘱的患者接受干预措施的医院间差异。

数据来源/设置:美国医疗保健研究与质量局,医疗保健成本和利用项目,加利福尼亚州住院患者数据库。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究,纳入年龄在 40 岁及以上、有侵入性治疗指征的住院患者:院内心搏骤停(CPR 指征)、急性呼吸衰竭(机械通气)、急性肾衰竭(血液透析)、脓毒性休克(中心静脉置管)和姑息治疗。分层逻辑回归分析医院“早期”DNR 率(入院后 24 小时内下达 DNR 医嘱)与侵入性干预措施使用的相关性。

数据收集/提取方法:加利福尼亚州住院患者数据库,2011 年。

主要发现

高 DNR 率医院的 DNR 医嘱患者接受急性呼吸衰竭侵入性机械通气或急性肾衰竭血液透析的可能性较小,但接受姑息治疗的可能性大于低 DNR 率医院的 DNR 医嘱患者。无 DNR 医嘱的患者无论医院 DNR 率如何,接受侵入性干预的几率相似。

结论

医院在有 DNR 医嘱的患者接受的侵入性或器官支持治疗范围方面差异很大。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Hospital Variation in Gastrostomy Tube Use among the Critically Ill.危重症患者胃造口管使用的医院差异
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Sep;16(9):1201-1203. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-250RL.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验