• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reviews of qualitative evidence: a new milestone for Cochrane.定性证据综述：Cochrane的一个新里程碑。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 8;2013(11):ED000073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000073.
2
Happy 20th birthday to the Cochrane Collaboration.祝考克兰协作网20岁生日快乐。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;42(5):503-5. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12244. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
3
The use of Cochrane Reviews in NICE clinical guidelines.Cochrane系统评价在英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所临床指南中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 9;2011(12):ED000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000032.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Should The Cochrane Collaboration be producing reviews of efficiency?考科蓝协作网是否应该开展有关效率的综述？
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 24;2013(10):ED000071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000071.
6
Centralised access to evidence-informed nutrition actions.集中获取基于证据的营养行动。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 5;2011(10):ED000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000034.
7
The impact of Cochrane Reviews.考克兰系统评价的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 7;2011(7):ED000007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000007.
8
Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: a case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers.定性研究仍然太少，无法阐明有效性试验综述的结果：以 Cochrane 关于使用非专业卫生工作者的综述为例。
Implement Sci. 2011 May 27;6:53. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-53.
9
Ensuring relevance for Cochrane reviews: evaluating processes and methods for prioritizing topics for Cochrane reviews.确保 Cochrane 综述的相关性：评估优先考虑 Cochrane 综述主题的过程和方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 May;66(5):474-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
10
Evidence-based urology in practice: the Cochrane Library.实践中的循证泌尿外科：考克兰图书馆
BJU Int. 2009 Oct;104(8):1048-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08749.x. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of GRADE-CERQual in qualitative evidence synthesis: an evaluation of fidelity and reporting.在定性证据综合中使用 GRADE-CERQual：对忠实性和报告的评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 25;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00999-3.
2
A systematic review of qualitative literature on antimicrobial stewardship in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区抗菌药物管理的定性文献系统评价。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Aug 20;6(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00216-0.
3
Barriers and facilitators of disclosing domestic violence to the healthcare service: A systematic review of qualitative research.向医疗保健服务机构披露家庭暴力的障碍和促进因素：定性研究的系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 May;29(3):612-630. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13282. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
4
Semiautomated text analytics for qualitative data synthesis.半自动化文本分析在定性数据综合中的应用。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Sep;10(3):452-464. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1361. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesis.在定性证据综合中提出问题以探索复杂干预措施。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e001107. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001107. eCollection 2019.
6
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance.改善元分析报告：eMERGe 报告指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0.
7
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance.改善元分析报告质量：eMERGe 报告指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):1126-1139. doi: 10.1111/jan.13809. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
8
Metasynthetic Madness: What Kind of Monster Have We Created?综合集成的疯狂：我们创造了什么样的怪物？
Qual Health Res. 2017 Jan;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/1049732316679370.
9
Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey.定性研究中传播偏倚的程度、认知与感知：一项探索性调查
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0159290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159290. eCollection 2016.
10
Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review.寻找纳入系统评价的定性研究：一项结构化方法学综述。
Syst Rev. 2016 May 4;5:74. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0249-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素：定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
2
Cochrane methods--twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods.考克兰方法——发展系统评价方法二十年的经验。
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 20;2:76. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-76.
3
Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases.基层和社区卫生保健中负责母婴健康及传染病管理的非专业卫生工作者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD004015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004015.pub3.

Reviews of qualitative evidence: a new milestone for Cochrane.

作者信息

Gülmezoglu A Metin, Chandler Jackie, Shepperd Sasha, Pantoja Tomás

机构信息

Maternal and Perinatal Health and Preventing Unsafe Abortion, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme for Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 8;2013(11):ED000073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000073.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.ED000073
PMID:24524152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10846360/
Abstract
摘要