• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相同策略不同行业:企业对公共政策的影响。

Same strategy different industry: corporate influence on public policy.

机构信息

Donna Shelley is with the Department of Population Health, Division of Comparative Effectiveness and Decision Science, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. Gbenga Ogedegbe is with the Division of Health Behavior, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine. Brian Elbel is with the Division of Health Behavior, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Apr;104(4):e9-e11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301832. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301832
PMID:24524535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4025679/
Abstract

In March 2013 a state judge invalidated New York City's proposal to ban sales of sugar-sweetened beverages larger than 16 ounces; the case is under appeal. This setback was attributable in part to opposition from the beverage industry and racial/ethnic minority organizations they support. We provide lessons from similar tobacco industry efforts to block policies that reduced smoking prevalence. We offer recommendations that draw on the tobacco control movement's success in thwarting industry influence and promoting public health policies that hold promise to improve population health.

摘要

2013 年 3 月,一位州法官使纽约市禁止销售 16 盎司以上含糖饮料的提议无效;此案正在上诉中。这一挫折部分归因于饮料行业及其支持的种族/少数民族组织的反对。我们从类似的烟草行业阻止降低吸烟率政策的努力中吸取了教训。我们提出了一些建议,借鉴了烟草控制运动成功地抵制行业影响并推动有望改善人口健康的公共卫生政策的经验。

相似文献

1
Same strategy different industry: corporate influence on public policy.相同策略不同行业:企业对公共政策的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Apr;104(4):e9-e11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301832. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
2
Public Health and Legal Arguments in Favor of a Policy to Cap the Portion Sizes of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages.支持对含糖饮料实行份量上限政策的公共卫生与法律论据。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2183-90. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302862. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
3
The influence of the sugar-sweetened beverage industry on public policies in Mexico.含糖饮料行业对墨西哥公共政策的影响。
Int J Public Health. 2020 Sep;65(7):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01414-2. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
4
Large-sized soda ban as an alternative to soda tax.大型苏打水禁令作为苏打税的替代方案。
Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2013 Fall;23(1):187-232.
5
From butts to Big Macs--can the Big Tobacco litigation and nation-wise settlement with states' attorneys general serve as a model for attacking the fast food industry?从烟蒂到巨无霸——烟草巨头诉讼案以及与各州检察长达成的全国性和解协议能否成为抨击快餐业的范例?
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2004;34(4):1383-415.
6
Applying lessons from tobacco litigation to obesity lawsuits.将烟草诉讼的经验教训应用于肥胖症诉讼。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.036.
7
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Labels: Lessons Learned From the Tobacco Industry.含糖饮料警告标签:从烟草行业吸取的教训
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2016 Dec;44(10):633-640.
8
News Media Framing of New York City's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Portion-Size Cap.新闻媒体对纽约市含糖饮料分量上限的报道框架
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105(11):2202-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302673. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
9
Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: how do they compare?苏打和烟草行业的企业社会责任活动:它们有何不同?
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001241. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
10
The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?忽视历史的危害:大烟草公司行为不端,数百万人丧生。食品巨头与之有多大相似之处呢?
Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):259-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Arguments in Support of Policies to Reduce Sugary Drink Consumption Among Low-Income White, Black and Latinx Parents of Young Children.支持减少低收入白种人、黑人和拉丁裔幼儿父母含糖饮料消费政策的观点。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jan;36(1):84-93. doi: 10.1177/08901171211030849. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
2
Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review.向美国政策制定者有效传播研究成果的策略:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 15;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3.
3
Food Industry Donations to Academic Programs: A Cross-Sectional Examination of the Extent of Publicly Available Data.食品行业对学术项目的捐赠:公开可用数据的范围的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 3;17(5):1624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051624.
4
The politics of voluntary self-regulation: insights from the development and promotion of the Australian Beverages Council's .自愿自我监管的政治学:澳大利亚饮料委员会发展与推广的启示
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23(3):564-575. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002003. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Online tobacco marketing among US adolescent sexual, gender, racial, and ethnic minorities.美国青少年性少数群体、性别少数群体、种族少数群体和族裔少数群体的网络烟草营销。
Addict Behav. 2019 Aug;95:189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model.影响政府营养政策的有效倡导策略:概念模型。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Aug 31;15(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0716-y.
7
Big Food's Ambivalence: Seeking Profit and Responsibility for Health.大型食品企业的矛盾心态:追求利润与对健康负责。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Mar;107(3):402-406. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303601. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
8
Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change.玩转政策游戏:营养政策变革的障碍与推动因素综述
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2643-53. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000677. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
9
Evaluation of the Evidence Base for the Alcohol Industry's Actions to Reduce Drink Driving Globally.全球酒精行业减少酒后驾车行动的证据基础评估。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):707-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303026. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
10
Is Sugar the new Tobacco? Insights from Laboratory Studies, Consumer Surveys and Public Health.糖会成为新的烟草吗?来自实验室研究、消费者调查及公共卫生领域的见解
Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):111-21. doi: 10.1007/s13679-015-0141-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Moving communities toward policy change: APPEAL's 4-prong policy change model.推动社区实现政策变革: APPEAL的四管齐下政策变革模型。
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Sep;14(5 Suppl):29S-35S. doi: 10.1177/1524839913484763. Epub 2013 May 24.
2
A historical review of R.J. Reynolds' strategies for marketing tobacco to Hispanics in the United States.美国 RJ 雷诺兹公司向美国西班牙裔推销烟草的营销策略的历史回顾。
Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):e15-27. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301256. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
3
Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010.美国成年人肥胖率及体重指数分布的趋势:1999-2010 年。
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.39. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?忽视历史的危害:大烟草公司行为不端,数百万人丧生。食品巨头与之有多大相似之处呢?
Milbank Q. 2009 Mar;87(1):259-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x.
5
R.J. Reynolds' targeting of African Americans: 1988-2000.R.J.雷诺兹对非裔美国人的针对性举措:1988 - 2000年
Am J Public Health. 2003 May;93(5):822-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.822.
6
African American leadership groups: smoking with the enemy.非裔美国领导团体:与敌人同流合污。
Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):336-45. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.336.