Tokunaga-Nakawatase Yuri, Nishigaki Masakazu, Taru Chiemi, Miyawaki Ikuko, Nishida Junko, Kosaka Shiho, Sanada Hiromi, Kazuma Keiko
Department of Adult Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Adult Nursing, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2014 Oct;8(3):207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
To investigate the effect of a computer-supported indirect-form lifestyle-modification program using Lifestyle Intervention Support Software for Diabetes Prevention (LISS-DP), as a clinically feasible strategy for primary prevention, on diet and physical activity habits in adults with a family history of type 2 diabetes.
This was a two-arm, randomized controlled trial: (1) lifestyle intervention (LI) group (n=70); (2) control (n=71). Healthy adults aged 30-60 years with a history of type 2 diabetes among their first-degree relatives were recruited. LI group received three times of lifestyle intervention using LISS-DP during six-month intervention period via mail.
Lifestyle intervention group showed significantly greater decrease in energy intake six months after baseline, compared to control (-118.31 and -24.79 kcal/day, respectively, p=0.0099, Cohen's d=0.22), though the difference disappeared 1 year after from baseline. No difference was found in physical activity energy expenditure.
A computer-based, non-face-to-face lifestyle intervention was effective on dietary habits, only during the intervention period. Further examination of the long-term effects of such intervention and physical activity is required.
探讨使用糖尿病预防生活方式干预支持软件(LISS-DP)的计算机辅助间接形式生活方式改变计划作为一级预防的临床可行策略,对有2型糖尿病家族史的成年人饮食和身体活动习惯的影响。
这是一项双臂随机对照试验:(1)生活方式干预(LI)组(n = 70);(2)对照组(n = 71)。招募了30至60岁、一级亲属中有2型糖尿病病史的健康成年人。LI组在为期6个月的干预期内通过邮件使用LISS-DP接受了3次生活方式干预。
与对照组相比,生活方式干预组在基线后6个月能量摄入显著下降更多(分别为-118.31和-24.79千卡/天,p = 0.0099,科恩d值 = 0.22),尽管从基线起1年后差异消失。身体活动能量消耗方面未发现差异。
基于计算机的非面对面生活方式干预仅在干预期内对饮食习惯有效。需要进一步研究这种干预和身体活动的长期影响。