VanDerNagel Joanneke E L, Kiewik Marion, Postel Marloes G, van Dijk Marike, Didden Robert, Buitelaar Jan K, de Jong Cor A J
Tactus Addiction Treatment, Raiffeisenstraat 75, 7514 AM Enschede, The Netherlands; Nijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 6909, 6503 GK Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Aveleijn, Grotestraat 260, 7622 GW Borne, The Netherlands.
Nijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 6909, 6503 GK Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Aveleijn, Grotestraat 260, 7622 GW Borne, The Netherlands.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Apr;35(4):808-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.018. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
Persons with mild to borderline intellectual disability (MID) have been identified as a group at risk for substance use disorder (SUD). However, prevalence estimates of co-occurring SUD and MID rely largely on single source studies performed in selected samples. To obtain more reliable population estimates of SUD and MID, this study combines data from an Intellectual Disability Facility (IDF), and an Addiction Treatment Centre (ATC) in a semi-rural area in the Netherlands. Capture-recapture analysis was used to estimate the hidden population (i.e., the population not identified in the original samples). Further analyses were performed for age and gender stratified data. Staff members reported on 88 patients with SUD and MID in the IDF (4.0% of the IDF sample) and 114 in the ATC (5.2% of the ATC sample), with 12 patients in both groups. Only strata for males over 30 years provided reliable population estimates. Based on 97 patients in these strata, the hidden population was estimated at 215. Hence the estimated total population of males over 30 years old with MID and SUD was 312 (95% CI 143-481), approximately 0.16% (0.05-0.25%) of the total population of this age and gender group. This illustrates that while patients with co-occurring SUD and MID often receive professional help from only one service provider, single source data underestimate its prevalence, and thus underestimate treatment and service needs. Therefore, population prevalence estimations of co-occurring SUD and MID should be based on combined multiple source data.
轻度至边缘性智力障碍(MID)患者已被确定为物质使用障碍(SUD)的高危人群。然而,SUD与MID共病的患病率估计主要依赖于在特定样本中进行的单一来源研究。为了获得更可靠的SUD和MID人群估计数,本研究将荷兰一个半农村地区的智力残疾机构(IDF)和一个成瘾治疗中心(ATC)的数据进行了合并。采用捕获-再捕获分析来估计隐藏人群(即原始样本中未识别的人群)。对年龄和性别分层数据进行了进一步分析。工作人员报告了IDF中88例患有SUD和MID的患者(占IDF样本的4.0%)以及ATC中114例此类患者(占ATC样本的5.2%),两组中有12例患者重叠。只有30岁以上男性的分层提供了可靠的人群估计数。基于这些分层中的97例患者,估计隐藏人群为215人。因此,估计30岁以上患有MID和SUD的男性总人口为312人(95%可信区间143 - 481),约占该年龄和性别组总人口的0.16%(0.05 - 0.25%)。这表明,虽然SUD和MID共病的患者通常仅从一个服务提供者处获得专业帮助,但单一来源数据低估了其患病率,从而低估了治疗和服务需求。因此,SUD和MID共病的人群患病率估计应基于多个来源数据的合并。