Ugur Murat, Suri Rakesh M, Daly Richard C, Dearani Joseph A, Park Soon J, Joyce Lyle D, Burkhart Harold M, Greason Kevin L, Schaff Hartzell V
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1940-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.12.051. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
The study objective was to determine whether the new-generation Trifecta (St Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, Minn) bovine aortic valve bioprosthesis, which is designed for supra-annular positioning, produces early postoperative hemodynamic results comparable to or better than those of the Mitroflow (Sorin Group, Milan, Italy) or Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, Calif) bovine aortic valve bioprostheses.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a Trifecta, Mitroflow, or Perimount Magna bovine pericardial prosthesis at Mayo Clinic between June 2007 and December 2012 and analyzed early postoperative hemodynamic performance by Doppler echocardiography.
A total of 1436 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (Trifecta in 196, Mitroflow in 1135, Perimount Magna in 105). Preoperative characteristics and early clinical outcomes were similar among the 3 valve groups. The average mean gradients were lower and valve areas were greater with the Trifecta valves. For the Trifecta, Mitroflow, and Perimount Magna valves, the average mean gradient was 11.4 mm Hg, 16.9 mm Hg, and 14.1 mm Hg, respectively; the effective orifice area was 2.22 cm2, 1.85 cm2, and 2.09 cm2, respectively; and the indexed effective orifice area was 1.14 cm2/m2, 0.96 cm2/m2, and 1.07 cm2/m2, respectively (all P<.001). Similar statistical significance was found when data were stratified by valve size. Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (indexed effective orifice area<0.60 cm2/m2) was detected in 1.3% of patients (n=2/150) with the Trifecta, 5.8% of patients (n=44/758) with the Mitroflow, and 3.2% of patients (n=3/95) with the Perimount Magna (P=.048).
Early hemodynamic postoperative performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis is favorable. Additional follow-up should determine whether these small hemodynamic differences will persist and influence later clinical outcomes.
本研究旨在确定新一代Trifecta(圣犹达医疗公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗)牛主动脉瓣生物假体,其设计用于瓣环上定位,术后早期血流动力学结果是否与Mitroflow(索林集团,意大利米兰)或Perimount Magna(爱德华兹生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文)牛主动脉瓣生物假体相当或更优。
我们回顾性分析了2007年6月至2012年12月在梅奥诊所接受Trifecta、Mitroflow或Perimount Magna牛心包生物假体主动脉瓣置换术患者的病历,并通过多普勒超声心动图分析术后早期血流动力学表现。
共有1436例患者接受了主动脉瓣置换术(196例使用Trifecta,1135例使用Mitroflow,105例使用Perimount Magna)。三个瓣膜组术前特征和早期临床结果相似。Trifecta瓣膜的平均跨瓣压差较低,瓣口面积较大。Trifecta、Mitroflow和Perimount Magna瓣膜的平均跨瓣压差分别为11.4 mmHg、16.9 mmHg和14.1 mmHg;有效瓣口面积分别为2.22 cm²、1.85 cm²和2.09 cm²;标准化有效瓣口面积分别为1.14 cm²/m²、0.96 cm²/m²和1.07 cm²/m²(均P<0.001)。按瓣膜尺寸分层分析数据时,发现了类似的统计学显著性差异。Trifecta组1.3%(n=2/150)的患者、Mitroflow组5.8%(n=44/758)的患者和Perimount Magna组3.2%(n=3/95)的患者检测到严重的人工瓣膜-患者不匹配(标准化有效瓣口面积<0.60 cm²/m²)(P=0.048)。
Trifecta生物假体术后早期血流动力学表现良好。进一步随访应确定这些微小的血流动力学差异是否会持续存在并影响后期临床结果。