• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Perceval无缝生物瓣膜与Trifecta缝合生物瓣膜用于主动脉瓣置换术的比较:该研究的即时结果

Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of the study.

作者信息

Nardi Paolo, Altieri Claudia, Pisano Calogera, Buioni Dario, Agneni Federico, Grizzi Giorgia, Dakli Martin, Salvati Alessandro Cristian, Scognamiglio Mattia, Bassano Carlo, Ruvolo Giovanni

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2024 Sep;21(3):153-161. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2024.143499. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

DOI:10.5114/kitp.2024.143499
PMID:39484109
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523484/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Perceval sutureless biological prosthesis for aortic valve replacement has been introduced with the rationale for shortening surgical, extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping times, in order to reduce postoperative complications.

AIM

To evaluate early hemodynamic performance and immediate outcomes of implantation of the Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis in comparison with the St. Jude Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (Perfecta study).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between December 2014 and June 2023, 281 patients underwent St. Jude Trifecta implantation ( = 220, mean age: 75.2 ±6.5 years) and Perceval implantation, when indicated ( = 61, mean age: 77.9 ±5.1 years). Concomitant CABG was performed in 73 (33%) and in 27 (44%) patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Extracorporeal circulation and cross-clamp times were significantly shorter in Perceval patients in all aortic valve replacements (61 ±23 and 49 ±18 minutes vs. 96 ±36 and 67 ±21 minutes), and in isolated procedures (54 ±10 and 43 ±8 minutes vs. 84 ±28 and 66 ±21 minutes) ( < 0.0001, for all comparisons). Operative mortality was absent and 2.7%, respectively ( = 0.2). Postoperatively, low output cardiac syndrome (0% vs. 4.5%) and total rate of major cardiac and non-cardiac related complications (6.6% vs. 18.6%) were significantly lower in Perceval patients ( = 0.01). Echocardiography at discharge in comparison with preoperatively showed a relevant and similar decrease of mean and peak trans-aortic valve gradients for the Trifecta prosthesis (11.6 ±4.3 vs. 50 ±15.2 mm Hg; 21.6 ±7.3 vs. 78.8 ±24 mm Hg) and for the Perceval prosthesis (12.6 ±4.8 vs. 52 ±12.5 mm Hg; 22.6 ±7.9 vs. 77.8 ±16 mm Hg) ( < 0.00001, for all comparisons). Better global cardiac function was observed in Perceval patients. Concomitant multi-vessel and left main coronary artery disease ( = 0.046; HR = 4.6) and chronic pulmonary disease ( = 0.006; HR = 5.6) were detected as independent predictors of death and postoperative major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Early hemodynamic performance appears to be satisfactory with the use of Trifecta sutured and Perceval sutureless bioprostheses. Perceval implantation allows reduction of surgical times, better preservation of myocardial contractile function and, consequently, reduction of the risk of postoperative complications.

摘要

引言

用于主动脉瓣置换的Perceval无缝合生物假体已被引入,其理论依据是缩短手术、体外循环和主动脉阻断时间,以减少术后并发症。

目的

与圣犹达Trifecta缝合生物假体用于主动脉瓣置换相比,评估Perceval无缝合生物假体植入的早期血流动力学性能和即刻结果(Perfecta研究)。

材料与方法

2014年12月至2023年6月期间,281例患者接受了圣犹达Trifecta植入(n = 220,平均年龄:75.2±6.5岁),并在有指征时接受了Perceval植入(n = 61,平均年龄:77.9±5.1岁)。分别有73例(33%)和27例(44%)患者同时进行了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。

结果

在所有主动脉瓣置换术中,Perceval组患者的体外循环和阻断时间显著缩短(61±23分钟和49±18分钟,对比96±36分钟和67±21分钟),在单纯手术中也是如此(54±10分钟和43±8分钟,对比84±28分钟和66±21分钟)(所有比较,P < 0.0001)。手术死亡率分别为0%和2.7%(P = 0.2)。术后,Perceval组患者的低心排综合征(0%对比4.5%)以及主要心脏和非心脏相关并发症的总发生率(6.6%对比18.6%)显著更低(P = 0.01)。与术前相比,出院时超声心动图显示Trifecta假体的平均和跨主动脉瓣峰值梯度有显著且相似的下降(11.6±4.3对比50±15.2 mmHg;21.6±7.3对比78.8±24 mmHg),Perceval假体也是如此(12.6±4.8对比52±12.5 mmHg;22.6±7.9对比77.8±16 mmHg)(所有比较,P < 0.00001)。Perceval组患者观察到更好的整体心脏功能。合并多支血管和左主干冠状动脉疾病(P = 0.046;HR = 4.6)以及慢性肺部疾病(P = 0.006;HR = 5.6)被检测为死亡和术后主要并发症的独立预测因素。

结论

使用Trifecta缝合生物假体和Perceval无缝合生物假体时,早期血流动力学性能似乎令人满意。Perceval植入可减少手术时间,更好地保留心肌收缩功能,从而降低术后并发症风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd26/11523484/aff048cbacd9/KITP-21-54884-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd26/11523484/aff048cbacd9/KITP-21-54884-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd26/11523484/aff048cbacd9/KITP-21-54884-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of the study.Perceval无缝生物瓣膜与Trifecta缝合生物瓣膜用于主动脉瓣置换术的比较:该研究的即时结果
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2024 Sep;21(3):153-161. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2024.143499. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
3
Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: Sutureless versus rapid-deployment.新一代生物假体主动脉瓣置换术:无缝合与快速部署。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):432-442.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.135. Epub 2019 May 11.
4
Initial experience with the Perceval S sutureless aortic valve.Perceval S无缝合主动脉瓣膜的初步经验。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2020 Mar;17(1):20-23. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2020.94186. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
5
Can Perceval sutureless valve reduce the rate of patient-prosthesis mismatch?†.Perceval无缝合瓣膜能否降低人工瓣膜与患者不匹配的发生率?†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;51(6):1093-1099. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx009.
6
Thrombocytopenia after Aortic Valve Replacement with Perceval S Sutureless Bioprosthesis.使用Perceval S无缝生物假体进行主动脉瓣置换术后的血小板减少症。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Jan;25(1):75-81.
7
Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.传统带支架生物瓣膜与无缝合生物瓣膜置换主动脉瓣:763例患者的研究
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr;33(2):122-128. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0088.
8
Sutureless perceval aortic valve replacement: results of two European centers.经导管无缝线百多力主动脉瓣置换术:两个欧洲中心的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 May;93(5):1483-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.071.
9
Two alternative sutureless strategies for aortic valve replacement: a two-center experience.主动脉瓣置换的两种替代性无缝合策略:一项两中心经验。
Innovations (Phila). 2013 Jul-Aug;8(4):253-7. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000007.
10
Conventional vs. Sutureless Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis: Is Faster Better?传统主动脉瓣生物假体与无缝合主动脉瓣生物假体:更快就更好吗?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jul 20;10(7):311. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10070311.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Perimount sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective, propensity-matched study.经皮主动脉瓣置换术与传统开胸主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的对比:一项回顾性、倾向评分匹配研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Feb 14;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02575-4.
2
Single-Center Real-World Experience with Sutureless Aortic Valve Prosthesis in Isolated and Combined Procedures.单中心孤立性和联合手术中使用无缝合主动脉瓣假体的真实世界经验。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 20;12(12):4163. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124163.
3
Perceval valve intermediate outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis at 5-year follow-up.
佩尔塞瓦尔瓣膜中期结果:5 年随访的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 11;18(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02273-7.
4
Conventional Prostheses versus Sutureless Perceval for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis.常规假体与无缝线 Percival 在主动脉瓣置换术中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jun 20;29(3):107-124. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.22-00125. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
5
Sutureless aortic valves in isolated and combined procedures: Thirteen years of experience in 784 patients.无缝合主动脉瓣在孤立和联合手术中的应用:784 例患者 13 年的经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;167(5):1724-1732.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.09.053. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
6
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
7
STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2021 Update on Outcomes, Quality, and Research.STS 成人心脏外科学数据库:2021 年手术结果、质量和研究更新。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun;111(6):1770-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.043. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
8
Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study.前瞻性多中心队列研究中使用无缝线主动脉生物瓣的中期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec;164(6):1772-1780.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.109. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
9
Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch.采用Perceval或Trifecta预防患者-假体不匹配。
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):2964. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092964.
10
Long-term outcome with sutureless valves: 12 years of Perceval experience.无缝合瓣膜的长期预后:12年的Perceval使用经验
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul;9(4):322-324. doi: 10.21037/acs.2020.04.03.