Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-3, Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Prog Neurobiol. 2014 May;116:66-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
Neuroimaging studies have repeatedly reported findings of activation in frontoparietal regions that largely overlap across various cognitive functions. Part of this frontoparietal activation has been interpreted as reflecting attentional mechanisms that can adaptively be directed towards external stimulation as well as internal representations (internal attention), thereby generating the experience of distinct cognitive functions. Nevertheless, findings of material- and task-specific activation in frontal and parietal regions challenge this internal attention hypothesis and have been used to support more modular hypotheses of cognitive function. The aim of this review is twofold: First, it discusses evidence in support of the concept of internal attention and the so-called dorsal attention network (DAN) as its neural source with respect to three cognitive functions (working memory, episodic retrieval, and mental imagery). While DAN activation in all three functions has been separately linked to internal attention, a comprehensive and integrative review has so far been lacking. Second, the review examines findings of material- and process-specific activation within frontoparietal regions, arguing that these results are well compatible with the internal attention account of frontoparietal activation. A new model of cognition is presented, proposing that supposedly different cognitive concepts actually rely on similar attentional network dynamics to maintain, reactivate and newly create internal representations of stimuli in various modalities. Attentional as well as representational mechanisms are assigned to frontal and parietal regions, positing that some regions are implicated in the allocation of attentional resources to perceptual or internal representations, but others are involved in the representational processes themselves.
神经影像学研究反复报告了在前顶叶区域发现的激活结果,这些结果在各种认知功能中基本重叠。该前顶叶激活的一部分被解释为反映了注意力机制,这些机制可以自适应地指向外部刺激和内部表示(内部注意),从而产生不同认知功能的体验。然而,在前额和顶叶区域发现的与材料和任务特异性相关的激活结果挑战了这种内部注意假设,并被用于支持认知功能的更模块化假设。本综述的目的有两个:首先,它讨论了支持内部注意概念和所谓的背侧注意网络(DAN)作为其神经源的证据,涉及三种认知功能(工作记忆、情景检索和心理意象)。虽然 DAN 在所有三种功能中的激活都与内部注意有关,但迄今为止还缺乏全面和综合的综述。其次,该综述检查了前顶叶区域中与材料和过程特异性相关的激活结果,认为这些结果与前顶叶激活的内部注意解释非常兼容。提出了一种新的认知模型,该模型假设看似不同的认知概念实际上依赖于类似的注意力网络动力学,以维持、重新激活和以各种方式新创建刺激的内部表示。注意和表示机制被分配到额顶叶区域,假设某些区域参与将注意力资源分配给感知或内部表示,而其他区域则参与表示过程本身。