Sasao Yasuhiro, Nohara Kanji, Okuno Kentaro, Nakamura Yuki, Sakai Takayoshi
Sasao Dental Clinic, Center for Oral Functional Disorders, 1-23-18, Nakatsumachi, Iwakuni City, Yamaguchi, 740-0027, Japan,
Sleep Breath. 2014 Dec;18(4):809-15. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-0947-3. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
In treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), oral appliance (OA) therapy is indicated in patients with mild-moderate OSA. However, since patients with severe OSA in whom OA therapy was effective have also been reported, it may not be possible to determine indications for OA therapy based on the severity alone. The purpose of this study was to determine indications for OA therapy using endoscopy during wakefulness in patients with severe OSA.
The subjects consisted of 36 patients (27 males and 9 females) diagnosed with severe OSA using all-night polysomnography. In each patient, a nasoendoscope was inserted in a horizontal position during nasal breathing, and morphological changes in the airway of the velopharynx and oro-hypopharynx with mandibular advancement were evaluated.
With mandibular advancement, the oro-hypopharynx was widened in all patients while the velopharynx was widened in 29 patients, but not in 7. The apnea hypopnea index (AHI) reduction rate after OA application was 79.8% (SD, 13.0%) in the group with and 40.6% (SD, 27.0%) in the group without velopharyngeal widening, being significantly different between the two groups. In the group showing velopharyngeal widening, evaluation of the direction of widening revealed two types: the "all-round type", which is circumferential widening in the anteroposterior-lateral directions, and the "lateral dominant type", which is widening mainly in the lateral direction. The AHI reduction rate was 80.1% (SD, 15.0%) for the all-round type and 79.3% (SD, 10.6%) for the lateral dominant type showing no significant difference.
(1) Concerning indications for OA therapy, findings in the velopharynx rather than those in the hypopharynx may be important. (2) The effects of OA therapy can be expected in the presence of velopharyngeal widening irrespective of its direction. Thus, to determine whether OA therapy is indicated, endoscopic evaluation of morphological changes in the velopharynx with mandibular advancement may be important.
在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的治疗中,口腔矫治器(OA)疗法适用于轻中度OSA患者。然而,由于也有报道称OA疗法对重度OSA患者有效,因此可能无法仅根据严重程度来确定OA疗法的适应症。本研究的目的是通过清醒状态下的内镜检查来确定重度OSA患者OA疗法的适应症。
研究对象包括36例患者(27例男性和9例女性),这些患者通过整夜多导睡眠图诊断为重度OSA。在每位患者鼻腔呼吸时,将鼻内镜水平插入,评估下颌前伸时腭咽和口咽-下咽气道的形态变化。
下颌前伸时,所有患者的口咽-下咽均增宽,29例患者的腭咽增宽,7例未增宽。应用OA后,腭咽增宽组的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)降低率为79.8%(标准差,13.0%),未增宽组为40.6%(标准差,27.0%),两组间差异有统计学意义。在腭咽增宽组中,对增宽方向的评估显示有两种类型:“全方位型”,即前后-侧向的圆周增宽;“侧向主导型”,即主要在侧向增宽。全方位型的AHI降低率为80.1%(标准差,15.0%),侧向主导型为79.3%(标准差,10.6%),差异无统计学意义。
(1)关于OA疗法的适应症,腭咽而非下咽的检查结果可能更重要。(2)无论腭咽增宽的方向如何,在腭咽增宽的情况下均可预期OA疗法的效果。因此,为了确定是否适合应用OA疗法,下颌前伸时腭咽形态变化的内镜评估可能很重要。