Department of Neurological Surgery, Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Indiana University, 355 W 16th St. Ste 5100, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA,
J Neurooncol. 2014 May;118(1):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1402-9. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
The effectiveness of seizure prophylaxis in controlling postoperative seizures following craniotomy for tumor resection is unclear. Most patients are seizure-free before surgery. To prevent seizures, it is common to treat tumor craniotomy patients postoperatively with an antiepileptic drug (AED). The authors retrospectively analyzed seizure occurrence with and without postoperative prophylactic AEDs. Between 2005 and 2011 at the authors' institution, 588 patients underwent craniotomy for brain tumors and were screened. Data on seizures, AED use, histopathology, comorbidities, complications, and follow-up were collected. Exclusion criteria included lack of follow-up data, previous operation, preoperative seizures, or preoperative AED prophylaxis. The incidence of postoperative seizures in patients with and without prophylactic AEDs was compared using logistic regression analysis. A total of 202 patients (50.5% female) were included. The most common tumor diagnosis was metastasis (42.6%). Of the 202 patients, 66.3% were prescribed prophylactic AED after surgery. Forty-six of 202 (22.8%) suffered a postoperative seizure. The odds of seizure for patients on prophylactic AED was 1.62 times higher than those not on AED (p = 0.2867). No difference was found in seizure occurrence between patients with glioblastoma multiforme compared with other tumor types (odds ratio 1.75, p = 0.1468). No difference was found in time-to-seizure between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.38, p = 0.3776). These data show no statistically significant benefit to prophylactic postoperative AED and a nonsignificant trend for increased seizure risk with AEDs. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial is needed to clarify the benefit of postoperative AED use for brain tumor resection.
术后预防性使用抗癫痫药物(AED)对控制肿瘤切除术后颅切除术患者的癫痫发作的有效性尚不清楚。大多数患者在手术前没有癫痫发作。为了预防癫痫发作,术后常对肿瘤开颅手术患者使用 AED。作者回顾性分析了有无术后预防性 AED 的癫痫发作。作者所在机构于 2005 年至 2011 年间对 588 例因脑肿瘤行开颅手术的患者进行了筛查。收集了癫痫发作、AED 使用、组织病理学、合并症、并发症和随访的数据。排除标准包括缺乏随访数据、既往手术、术前癫痫发作或术前 AED 预防。使用逻辑回归分析比较了有和无预防性 AED 的患者术后癫痫发作的发生率。共纳入 202 例患者(50.5%为女性)。最常见的肿瘤诊断为转移瘤(42.6%)。202 例患者中,66.3%术后给予预防性 AED。202 例中有 46 例(22.8%)发生术后癫痫发作。服用预防性 AED 的患者发生癫痫的几率是未服用 AED 的患者的 1.62 倍(p=0.2867)。与其他肿瘤类型相比,胶质母细胞瘤患者的癫痫发作发生率无差异(优势比 1.75,p=0.1468)。两组之间的癫痫发作时间无差异(风险比 1.38,p=0.3776)。这些数据表明,术后预防性使用 AED 没有统计学上的显著益处,且使用 AED 会增加癫痫发作的风险,但这种趋势不显著。需要进行随机、安慰剂对照试验,以明确术后 AED 对脑肿瘤切除的益处。