Suppr超能文献

脑肿瘤切除术中及术后新发癫痫:风险评估分析。

New-onset seizure during and after brain tumor excision: a risk assessment analysis.

机构信息

Departments of1Neurosurgery and.

2Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1713-1718. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS162315. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in seizure-naïve brain tumor patients remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to characterize a subset of patients at highest risk for new-onset perioperative seizures (i.e., intraoperative and postoperative seizures occurring within 30 days of surgery) who may benefit from prophylactic AEDs. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective case-control study of all adults who had undergone tumor resection or biopsy at the authors' institution between January 1, 2004, and June 31, 2015. All patients with a history of preoperative seizures, posterior fossa tumors, pituitary tumors, and parasellar tumors were excluded. A control group was matched to the seizure patients according to age (± 0 years). Demographic data, clinical status, operative data, and postoperative course data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Among 1693 patients who underwent tumor resection or biopsy, 549 (32.4%) had never had a preoperative seizure. Of these 549 patients, 25 (4.6%) suffered a perioperative seizure (Group 1). A total of 524 patients (95.4%) who remained seizure free were matched to Group 1 according to age (± 0 years), resulting in 132 control patients (Group 2), at an approximate ratio of 1:5. There were no differences between the patient groups in terms of age, sex, race, relationship status, and neurological deficits on presentation. Histological subtype (infiltrating glioma vs meningioma vs other, p = 0.041), intradural tumor location (p < 0.001), intraoperative cortical stimulation (p = 0.004), and extent of resection (less than gross total, p = 0.002) were associated with the occurrence of perioperative seizures. CONCLUSIONS While most seizure-naïve brain tumor patients do not benefit from perioperative seizure prophylaxis, such treatment should be considered in high-risk patients with supratentorial intradural tumors, in patients undergoing intraoperative cortical stimulation, and in patients in whom subtotal resection is likely.

摘要

目的

在无癫痫发作史的脑肿瘤患者中预防性使用抗癫痫药物(AED)仍然是一个有争议的话题。本研究旨在确定一组发生新发性围手术期癫痫(即手术期间和术后 30 天内发生的癫痫)风险最高的患者亚组,这些患者可能受益于预防性 AED 治疗。

方法

作者对 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 31 日期间在作者所在机构接受肿瘤切除术或活检的所有成年人进行了回顾性病例对照研究。所有术前有癫痫发作史、后颅窝肿瘤、垂体肿瘤和鞍旁肿瘤的患者均被排除在外。根据年龄(±0 岁)与癫痫发作患者匹配对照组。收集并分析了人口统计学数据、临床状况、手术数据和术后病程数据。

结果

在 1693 名接受肿瘤切除术或活检的患者中,549 名(32.4%)患者术前无癫痫发作史。在这 549 名患者中,有 25 名(4.6%)发生围手术期癫痫发作(第 1 组)。共有 524 名(95.4%)无癫痫发作的患者根据年龄(±0 岁)与第 1 组相匹配,得到 132 名对照组患者(第 2 组),比例约为 1:5。两组患者在年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况和发病时的神经功能缺损方面无差异。组织学亚型(浸润性胶质瘤与脑膜瘤与其他,p = 0.041)、颅内肿瘤位置(p < 0.001)、术中皮质刺激(p = 0.004)和切除程度(不完全切除,p = 0.002)与围手术期癫痫发作有关。

结论

虽然大多数无癫痫发作史的脑肿瘤患者不需要预防性抗癫痫治疗,但对于存在以下情况的高危患者,应考虑使用这种治疗方法:幕上颅内肿瘤、术中皮质刺激和可能需要行次全切除的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验