• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)与其他基于实证的多动症评估方法的比较效度

Comparative Validity of DSM-IV and Alternative Empirically Derived Approaches for the Assessment of ADHD.

作者信息

Shemmassian Shirag K, Lee Steve S

机构信息

1 University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Atten Disord. 2017 Mar;21(5):405-415. doi: 10.1177/1087054714522511. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1177/1087054714522511
PMID:24532800
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify ADHD symptoms that are most highly predictive of ADHD diagnostic status and compare them against Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) algorithms in predictions of functional impairment.

METHOD

Parent and teacher ratings of ADHD were obtained from an ethnically diverse (46% non-White) sample of 151 five- to ten-year-old children (27% female) with ( n = 76) and without ( n = 75) DSM-IV ADHD. We calculated total predictive values to estimate how ratings of each ADHD symptom predicted ADHD diagnostic status based on a structured parent diagnostic interview. Optimal symptom thresholds (i.e., not at all, just a little, pretty much, very much) for predicting ADHD caseness differed for inattention and hyperactivity and parents versus teachers. Algorithms consisting of highly predictive symptoms were then created and compared against DSM-IV-based algorithms to predict independent measures of functional impairment.

RESULTS

Several empirically derived symptom algorithms were more strongly associated with functional impairment than DSM-IV-based algorithms.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary findings suggest that alternative methods to aggregating ADHD symptoms may improve predictions of impairment.

摘要

目的

确定对注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)诊断状态具有最高预测性的ADHD症状,并将其与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版;DSM-IV)算法在功能损害预测方面进行比较。

方法

从151名5至10岁儿童(27%为女性)的种族多样化样本(46%为非白人)中获取ADHD的家长和教师评分,其中76名患有DSM-IV ADHD,75名未患。我们计算了总预测值,以估计基于结构化家长诊断访谈,每种ADHD症状的评分如何预测ADHD诊断状态。预测ADHD病例的最佳症状阈值(即一点也没有、只是有一点、相当多、非常多)在注意力不集中和多动方面以及家长与教师之间有所不同。然后创建了由高度预测性症状组成的算法,并与基于DSM-IV的算法进行比较,以预测功能损害的独立指标。

结果

与基于DSM-IV的算法相比,几种基于经验得出的症状算法与功能损害的关联更强。

结论

这些初步发现表明,汇总ADHD症状的替代方法可能会改善对损害的预测。

相似文献

1
Comparative Validity of DSM-IV and Alternative Empirically Derived Approaches for the Assessment of ADHD.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)与其他基于实证的多动症评估方法的比较效度
J Atten Disord. 2017 Mar;21(5):405-415. doi: 10.1177/1087054714522511. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
2
Predictive validity of ICD-10 hyperkinetic disorder relative to DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among younger children.相对于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)中的注意缺陷多动障碍,国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)中多动障碍在年幼儿童中的预测效度。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 May;47(5):472-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01590.x.
3
Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍的循证评估
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005 Sep;34(3):449-76. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3403_5.
4
Impact of child and informant gender on parent and teacher ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.儿童和报告人(信息提供者)的性别对父母和教师评定注意缺陷多动障碍的影响。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Oct;30(10):1390-1394. doi: 10.1037/pas0000627. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
Agreement Among Categorical, Dimensional, and Impairment Criteria for ADHD and Common Comorbidities.多动症及常见共病的分类、维度和损害标准之间的一致性。
J Atten Disord. 2016 Aug;20(8):665-73. doi: 10.1177/1087054712475083. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Predictive Utility of Four Methods of Incorporating Parent and Teacher Symptom Ratings of ADHD for Longitudinal Outcomes.纳入父母和教师对多动症症状评分的四种方法对纵向结果的预测效用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(2):176-87. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.971457. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
7
[Attention deficit/hyperactive disorders in children and adolescents as assessed by parents].[父母评估的儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2009 May;37(3):183-94. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917.37.3.183.
8
Behavioral characteristics of DSM-IV ADHD subtypes in a school-based population.基于学校人群的DSM-IV注意力缺陷多动障碍亚型的行为特征
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1997 Apr;25(2):103-11. doi: 10.1023/a:1025775311259.
9
Combined type versus ADHD predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type: is there a difference in functional impairment?混合型与注意缺陷多动障碍多动冲动为主型:功能损害存在差异吗?
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Aug;29(4):270-5. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31816b6afe.
10
Parent and teacher ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Factor structure and normative data.家长和教师评定的注意缺陷多动障碍症状:因子结构和常模数据。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Feb;28(2):214-25. doi: 10.1037/pas0000166. Epub 2015 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Where do neurodevelopmental conditions fit in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks? Incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum.神经发育障碍在跨诊断精神病学框架中处于什么位置?纳入一个新的神经发育谱系。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;23(3):333-357. doi: 10.1002/wps.21225.
2
Oppositional defiant disorder.对立违抗障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023 Jun 22;9(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00441-6.
3
Parent-based diagnosis of ADHD is as accurate as a teacher-based diagnosis of ADHD.基于家长的多动症诊断与基于教师的多动症诊断一样准确。
Postgrad Med. 2017 Apr;129(3):375-381. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1288064. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
The ADHD Concomitant Difficulties Scale (ADHD-CDS), a Brief Scale to Measure Comorbidity Associated to ADHD.注意力缺陷多动障碍伴随困难量表(ADHD-CDS),一种用于测量与注意力缺陷多动障碍相关共病的简短量表。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 14;7:871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00871. eCollection 2016.