Raaijmakers Lieke G M, Gevers Dorus W M, Teuscher Dorit, Kremers Stef P J, van Assema Patricia
Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 17;14:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-171.
To assess how much of a public health problem emotional and instrumental feeding practices are, we explored the use of these feeding practices in a sample of Dutch mothers regarding their child's food intake between main meals.
A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among 359 mothers of primary school children aged 4-12 years. The questionnaires were completed online at home.
Of the mothers, 29.5% reported using foods to reward, 18.1% to punish and 18.9% to comfort their child. Mothers most frequently offered energy-dense and nutrient-poor products such as candy in the context of emotional and instrumental feeding practices. The use of these practices was associated with a lower age of both mother and child and a higher educational level of the mother. Mothers living in neighborhoods with intermediate socioeconomic position used the practices less often than mothers from low and high socioeconomic position neighborhoods.
Our results show that mothers in our sample mainly used unhealthy products in the context of instrumental and emotional feeding practices. Research into the association between these practices and children's dietary intake is warranted, since the use of unhealthy products in the context of these practices may not necessarily lead to an increased consumption of these products. Findings regarding the frequency of use of these practices among specific subgroups can be used to carefully determine the target population for interventions and tailor the content of interventions to specific target group characteristics. Besides examining associations between personal and family characteristics and the use of emotional and instrumental feeding practices, attempts should be made to understand parents' reasons for using them.
为了评估情感喂养和工具性喂养行为在多大程度上属于公共卫生问题,我们在一组荷兰母亲中探究了这些喂养行为在孩子两餐之间食物摄入方面的使用情况。
对359名4至12岁小学生的母亲进行了一项横断面问卷调查研究。问卷在家庭中通过网络完成。
29.5%的母亲报告使用食物奖励孩子,18.1%用食物惩罚孩子,18.9%用食物安慰孩子。在情感喂养和工具性喂养行为中,母亲们最常提供能量密集但营养匮乏的产品,如糖果。这些行为的使用与母亲和孩子年龄较小以及母亲较高的教育水平有关。生活在社会经济地位中等社区的母亲比来自社会经济地位低和高社区的母亲较少使用这些行为。
我们的结果表明,我们样本中的母亲在工具性和情感喂养行为中主要使用不健康的产品。鉴于在这些行为中使用不健康产品不一定会导致这些产品的消费增加,因此有必要对这些行为与儿童饮食摄入之间的关联进行研究。关于特定亚组中这些行为使用频率的研究结果可用于谨慎确定干预的目标人群,并根据特定目标群体的特征调整干预内容。除了研究个人和家庭特征与情感和工具性喂养行为使用之间的关联外,还应尝试了解父母使用这些行为的原因。