Suppr超能文献

烧伤患者分离菌株的耐药性分析

Drug resistance analysis of bacterial strains isolated from burn patients.

作者信息

Wang L F, Li J L, Ma W H, Li J Y

机构信息

Inner Mongolia Institute of Burn Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China

Inner Mongolia Institute of Burn Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China.

出版信息

Genet Mol Res. 2014 Jan 22;13(4):9727-34. doi: 10.4238/2014.January.22.10.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the spectrum and drug resistance of bacteria isolated from burn patients to provide a reference for rational clinical use of antibiotics. Up to 1914 bacterial strain specimens isolated from burn patients admitted to hospital between 2001 and 2010 were subjected to resistance monitoring by using the K-B paper disk method. Retrospective analysis was performed on drug resistance analysis of burn patients. The top eight bacterium strains according to detection rate. A total of 1355 strains of Gram-negative (G(-)) bacteria and 559 strains of Gram-positive (G(+)) bacteria were detected. The top eight bacterium strains, according to detection rate, were Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Enterococcus. Drug resistance rates were higher than 90% in A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis, and S. aureus, which accounted for 52.2, 21.7, 27.8, and 33.3%, respectively, of the entire sample. Those with drug resistance rates lower than 30% accounted for 4.3, 30.4, 16.7, and 16.7%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) accounted for 49.2 and 76.4% of the S. epidermis and S. aureus resistance, respectively. Antibacterial drugs that had drug resistance rates to MRSE and MRSA higher than 90% accounted for 38.9 and 72.2%, respectively, whereas those with lower than 30% drug resistance rates accounted for 11.1 and 16.7%, respectively. The burn patients enrolled in the study were mainly infected with G(-) bacteria. These results strongly suggest that clinicians should practice rational use of antibiotics based on drug susceptibility test results.

摘要

本研究旨在分析烧伤患者分离出的细菌谱及耐药性,为临床合理使用抗生素提供参考。对2001年至2010年收治的烧伤患者分离出的多达1914株细菌菌株标本,采用K-B纸片扩散法进行耐药性监测。对烧伤患者的耐药性分析进行回顾性分析。根据检出率列出前八大菌株。共检测到1355株革兰阴性(G(-))菌和559株革兰阳性(G(+))菌。根据检出率,前八大菌株为鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌、表皮葡萄球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、阴沟肠杆菌和肠球菌。鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、表皮葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药率高于90%,分别占整个样本的52.2%、21.7%、27.8%和33.3%。耐药率低于30%的分别占4.3%、30.4%、16.7%和16.7%。耐多药金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌(MRSE)分别占表皮葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌耐药的49.2%和76.4%。对MRSE和MRSA耐药率高于90%的抗菌药物分别占38.9%和72.2%,而耐药率低于30%的分别占11.1%和16.7%。纳入研究的烧伤患者主要感染G(-)菌。这些结果强烈表明,临床医生应根据药敏试验结果合理使用抗生素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验