Postgrad Med. 2013 Jul;125(4 Suppl 1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2013.1110567111.
Chronic pain, whether localized or generalized, is a widespread, often debilitating condition affecting > 25% of adults in the United States. Oral agents are the cornerstone of chronic pain treatment, but their use may be limited in certain patients, particularly the elderly. Topical therapies offer advantages over systemically administered medications, including the requirement of a lower total systemic daily dose for patients to achieve pain relief, site-specific drug delivery, and avoidance of first-pass metabolism, major drug interactions, infections, and systemic side effects. Several types of topical agents have been shown to be useful in the treatment of patients with chronic pain. Both capsaicin and topical diclofenac have been shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with chronic soft-tissue pain. In patients with hand and knee osteoarthritis (OA), the American College of Rheumatology generally recommends oral treatments (acetaminophen, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], tramadol, and intra-articular corticosteroids) and topical NSAIDs equally, favoring topical agents only for patients who have pre-existing gastrointestinal risk or are aged ≥ 75 years. Topical NSAIDs have been shown to provide relief superior to that of placebo and comparable to that of oral ibuprofen. Similarly, ketoprofen gel has been shown to be superior to placebo and similar to oral celecoxib in reducing pain in patients with knee OA. Different formulations of topical diclofenac (including the diclofenac hydroxyethyl pyrrolidine patch, diclofenac sodium gel, and diclofenac sodium topical solution 1.5% w/w with dimethyl sulfoxide USP) have been shown to be superior to placebo and comparable to oral diclofenac in the treatment of patients with pain due to knee OA, with a lower incidence of gastrointestinal complaints than with the oral formulation. In patients with neuropathic pain, topical forms of both capsaicin and lidocaine have been shown to be useful in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Lidocaine has also demonstrated efficacy in relieving patient pain due to complex regional pain syndrome and may be useful in the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain who have cancer, although clinical trial results have not been consistent. Data suggest that topical therapies may offer a safe, well-tolerated, and effective alternative to systemic therapies in the treatment of patients with chronic, localized musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain.
慢性疼痛,无论是局部性的还是全身性的,是一种广泛存在的、常常使人虚弱的疾病,影响美国超过 25%的成年人。口服药物是慢性疼痛治疗的基石,但在某些患者中,特别是老年人,其使用可能受到限制。局部治疗比全身给药具有优势,包括患者达到疼痛缓解所需的总全身日剂量较低、药物的局部作用、避免首过代谢、主要药物相互作用、感染和全身副作用。几种类型的局部药物已被证明对慢性疼痛患者的治疗有效。辣椒素和外用双氯芬酸都已被证明对慢性软组织疼痛患者有效。对于手部和膝关节骨关节炎 (OA) 患者,美国风湿病学会通常推荐口服治疗(对乙酰氨基酚、口服非甾体抗炎药 [NSAIDs]、曲马多和关节内皮质类固醇)和局部 NSAIDs 同样有效,仅对存在胃肠道风险或年龄≥75 岁的患者推荐局部药物。局部 NSAIDs 已被证明在缓解疼痛方面优于安慰剂,与口服布洛芬相当。同样,酮咯酸凝胶在减轻膝关节 OA 患者的疼痛方面优于安慰剂,与口服塞来昔布相当。不同的双氯芬酸局部制剂(包括双氯芬酸羟乙基吡咯烷贴剂、双氯芬酸钠凝胶和二甲基亚砜 USP 1.5%w/w 的双氯芬酸钠溶液)已被证明在治疗膝关节 OA 引起的疼痛方面优于安慰剂,且胃肠道不良反应发生率低于口服制剂。在神经病理性疼痛患者中,辣椒素和利多卡因的局部制剂都已被证明对疱疹后神经痛和糖尿病周围神经病理性疼痛的治疗有效。利多卡因也已被证明在缓解复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的疼痛方面有效,并且可能对患有癌症的神经病理性疼痛患者有用,尽管临床试验结果并不一致。数据表明,局部治疗可能为治疗慢性局部肌肉骨骼和神经病理性疼痛患者提供一种安全、耐受良好且有效的替代全身治疗的方法。