Zheng M, Allman-Farinelli M, Heitmann B L, Toelle B, Marks G, Cowell C, Rangan A
School of Molecular Bioscience, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28 Suppl 2:70-9. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12223. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
The debate about whether energy consumed in liquid form is more obesogenic than energy consumed in solid form remains equivocal. We aimed to evaluate the effects of liquid versus solid energy intake and different beverage types on changes in childhood adiposity.
Our analyses included 8-year-old Australian children (n = 158) participating in the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study. Dietary information was collected using three 24-h recalls at age 9 years. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the effects of liquid versus solid energy intake and different beverage types on changes in body mass index (BMI) Z-score from ages 8 to 11.5 years (△BMIz(8-11.5y)) and percentage body fat (%BF) at age 11.5 years (%BF(11.5y)). Substitution models were used to evaluate the effects of substituting other beverage types for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB).
Liquid energy intake (1 MJ day(-1)) was more closely associated with both △BMIz(8-11.5y) (β = 0.23, P = 0.02) and %BF(11.5y) (β = 2.31%, P = 0.01) than solid energy intake (△BMIz(8-11.5y): β = 0.12, P = 0.01 and %BF(11.5y): β = 0.80%, P = 0.07). SSB consumption (100 g day(-1)) was directly associated with △BMIz(8-11.5y) (β = 0.08, P = 0.02) and %BF(11.5y) (β = 0.92%, P = 0.004),whereas diet drinks (100 g day(-1) ) were inversely associated with △BMIz(8-11.5y) (β = 0.18, P = 0.02). Substitution of 100 g of SSB by 100 g of water or diet drink, but not other beverages, was inversely associated with both △BMIz(8-11.5y) and %BF(11.5y) (P < 0.01).
Our findings indicate that liquid energy is more obesogenic than solid energy. In particular, SSB, but not other beverage types, are a significant predictor of childhood adiposity and replacing SSB with water can have long-term beneficial effects on childhood adiposity.
关于液体形式摄入的能量是否比固体形式摄入的能量更易致肥胖的争论尚无定论。我们旨在评估液体与固体能量摄入以及不同饮料类型对儿童肥胖变化的影响。
我们的分析纳入了参与儿童哮喘预防研究的8岁澳大利亚儿童(n = 158)。在9岁时通过三次24小时饮食回顾收集饮食信息。使用多元线性回归来评估液体与固体能量摄入以及不同饮料类型对8至11.5岁时体重指数(BMI)Z评分变化(△BMIz(8 - 11.5y))和11.5岁时体脂百分比(%BF(11.5y))的影响。替代模型用于评估用其他饮料类型替代含糖饮料(SSB)的影响。
与固体能量摄入相比,液体能量摄入(1兆焦耳/天)与△BMIz(8 - .....
y)(β = 0.23,P = 0.02)和%BF(11.5y)(β = 2.31%,P = 0.01)的关联更为密切(△BMIz(8 - 11.5y):β = 0.12,P = 0.01;%BF(11.5y):β = 0.80%,P = 0.07)。饮用SSB(100克/天)与△BMIz(8 - 11.5y)(β = 0.08,P = 0.02)和%BF(11.5y)(β = 0.92%,P = 0.004)直接相关,而饮用无糖饮料(100克/天)与△BMIz(8 - 11.5y)呈负相关(β =
0.18,P = 0.02)。用100克水或无糖饮料替代100克SSB,但不是其他饮料,与△BMIz(8 - 11.5y)和%BF(11.5y)均呈负相关(P < 0.01)。
我们的研究结果表明,液体能量比固体能量更易致肥胖。特别是,SSB而非其他饮料类型是儿童肥胖的重要预测因素,用水替代SSB对儿童肥胖可能有长期有益影响。