Suppr超能文献

获取方式重要吗?重复使用临床护理数据的有效性评估。

Does access modality matter? Evaluation of validity in reusing clinical care data.

作者信息

Danford Christopher P, Horvath Monica M, Hammond W Edward, Ferranti Jeffrey M

机构信息

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC;

Duke Health Technology Solutions, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC;

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:278-83. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Self-service database portals may improve access to institutional data resources for clinical research or quality improvement, but questions remain about the validity of this approach. We tested the accuracy of data extracted from a clinical data repository using a self-service portal by comparing three approaches to measuring medication use among patients with coronary disease: (1) automated extraction using a portal, (2) extraction by an experienced data architect, and (3) manual chart abstraction. Outcomes included medications and diagnoses (e.g., myocardial infarction, heart failure). Charts were manually reviewed for 200 patients. Using matched criteria, self-service query identified 7327 of 7358 patients identified by the data analyst. For patients in both cohorts, agreement rates ranged from 0.99 for demographic data to 0.94 for laboratory data. Based on chart review, the self-service portal and the analyst had similar sensitivities and specificities for comorbid diagnoses and statin use.

摘要

自助式数据库门户可能会改善临床研究或质量改进对机构数据资源的获取,但这种方法的有效性仍存在疑问。我们通过比较三种测量冠心病患者用药情况的方法,测试了使用自助式门户从临床数据存储库中提取数据的准确性:(1)使用门户自动提取,(2)由经验丰富的数据架构师提取,以及(3)手动图表摘要。结果包括药物和诊断(如心肌梗死、心力衰竭)。对200名患者的图表进行了人工审核。使用匹配标准,自助查询识别出数据分析师识别出的7358名患者中的7327名。对于两个队列中的患者,人口统计学数据的一致率为0.99,实验室数据的一致率为0.94。基于图表审核,自助式门户和分析师在合并症诊断和他汀类药物使用方面具有相似的敏感性和特异性。

相似文献

1
Does access modality matter? Evaluation of validity in reusing clinical care data.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:278-83. eCollection 2013.
2
Points to consider in electrocardiogram waveform extraction.
J Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct;38(4):319-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.06.090.
4
A SOA statistical engine for biomedical data.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008 Oct;92(1):144-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
5
User-oriented views in health care information systems.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Dec;49(12):1387-98. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2002.805455.
6
An automated data verification approach for improving data quality in a clinical registry.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Nov;181:104840. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
8
Structured Query Language (SQL) fundamentals.
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2003 Feb;Chapter 9:Unit9.2. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0902s00.
9
An object-oriented programming system for the integration of internet-based bioinformatics resources.
Appl Bioinformatics. 2006;5(1):29-39. doi: 10.2165/00822942-200605010-00004.

引用本文的文献

2
Substance use disorders and medical comorbidities among high-need, high-risk patients with diabetes.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 May 1;186:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Mar 3.

本文引用的文献

2
Practices and perspectives on building integrated data repositories: results from a 2010 CTSA survey.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e119-24. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000508. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
4
The DEDUCE Guided Query tool: providing simplified access to clinical data for research and quality improvement.
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Apr;44(2):266-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
5
Identifying patient smoking status from medical discharge records.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):14-24. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2408. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
7
Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Sep-Oct;4(5):342-55. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040342.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验