Hagen Matthew S, Jopling Jeffrey K, Buchman Timothy G, Lee Eva K
Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare ; NSF I/UCRC Center for Health Organization Transformation ; College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA;
Emory Center for Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:841-50. eCollection 2013.
This paper examines several different queuing models for intensive care units (ICU) and the effects on wait times, utilization, return rates, mortalities, and number of patients served. Five separate intensive care units at an urban hospital are analyzed and distributions are fitted for arrivals and service durations. A system-based simulation model is built to capture all possible cases of patient flow after ICU admission. These include mortalities and returns before and after hospital exits. Patients are grouped into 9 different classes that are categorized by severity and length of stay (LOS). Each queuing model varies by the policies that are permitted and by the order the patients are admitted. The first set of models does not prioritize patients, but examines the advantages of smoothing the operating schedule for elective surgeries. The second set analyzes the differences between prioritizing admissions by expected LOS or patient severity. The last set permits early ICU discharges and conservative and aggressive bumping policies are contrasted. It was found that prioritizing patients by severity considerably reduced delays for critical cases, but also increased the average waiting time for all patients. Aggressive bumping significantly raised the return and mortality rates, but more conservative methods balance quality and efficiency with lowered wait times without serious consequences.
本文研究了重症监护病房(ICU)的几种不同排队模型,以及这些模型对等待时间、利用率、返回率、死亡率和服务患者数量的影响。对一家城市医院的五个独立重症监护病房进行了分析,并对患者到达时间和服务时长进行了分布拟合。构建了一个基于系统的模拟模型,以捕捉ICU收治后患者流动的所有可能情况。这些情况包括出院前和出院后的死亡和返回情况。患者被分为9个不同类别,根据病情严重程度和住院时长(LOS)进行分类。每个排队模型因允许的政策和患者入院顺序而异。第一组模型不区分患者优先级,而是研究为择期手术平滑手术安排的优势。第二组分析了根据预期住院时长或患者病情严重程度区分入院优先级的差异。最后一组允许提前从ICU出院,并对比了保守和激进的插队政策。研究发现,按病情严重程度区分患者优先级可显著减少危急病例的延迟,但也增加了所有患者的平均等待时间。激进的插队政策显著提高了返回率和死亡率,但更保守的方法在降低等待时间的同时平衡了质量和效率,且没有严重后果。