• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究不端行为导致论文被撤回所带来的经济成本和个人后果。

Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications.

作者信息

Stern Andrew M, Casadevall Arturo, Steen R Grant, Fang Ferric C

机构信息

Andrew M Stern Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.

Arturo Casadevall Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States; Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2014 Aug 14;3:e02956. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02956.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.02956
PMID:25124673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4132287/
Abstract

The number of retracted scientific articles has been increasing. Most retractions are associated with research misconduct, entailing financial costs to funding sources and damage to the careers of those committing misconduct. We sought to calculate the magnitude of these effects. Data relating to retracted manuscripts and authors found by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) to have committed misconduct were reviewed from public databases. Attributable costs of retracted manuscripts, and publication output and funding of researchers found to have committed misconduct were determined. We found that papers retracted due to misconduct accounted for approximately $58 million in direct funding by the NIH between 1992 and 2012, less than 1% of the NIH budget over this period. Each of these articles accounted for a mean of $392,582 in direct costs (SD $423,256). Researchers experienced a median 91.8% decrease in publication output and large declines in funding after censure by the ORI.

摘要

被撤回的科学论文数量一直在增加。大多数撤稿与研究不当行为有关,这给资助机构带来了经济成本,并损害了行为不当者的职业生涯。我们试图计算这些影响的程度。从公共数据库中审查了与被撤回的手稿以及被研究诚信办公室(ORI)认定有不当行为的作者相关的数据。确定了被撤回手稿的可归因成本,以及被认定有不当行为的研究人员的发表产出和资金情况。我们发现,1992年至2012年间,因不当行为被撤回的论文导致美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)直接资助约5800万美元,占该时期NIH预算的不到1%。每篇此类文章的直接成本平均为392,582美元(标准差423,256美元)。研究人员在受到ORI谴责后,发表产出中位数下降了91.8%,资金也大幅减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9707/4132287/de66eb06b290/elife02956f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9707/4132287/33f86a4d30c2/elife02956f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9707/4132287/51b4ecd9890f/elife02956f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9707/4132287/de66eb06b290/elife02956f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9707/4132287/33f86a4d30c2/elife02956f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9707/4132287/51b4ecd9890f/elife02956f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9707/4132287/de66eb06b290/elife02956f003.jpg

相似文献

1
Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications.研究不端行为导致论文被撤回所带来的经济成本和个人后果。
Elife. 2014 Aug 14;3:e02956. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02956.
2
Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions.健康与生命科学研究中的科研不端行为:巴西机构撤回文献的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 15;14(4):e0214272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214272. eCollection 2019.
3
Retracted publications in the drug literature.药物文献中的已撤回出版物。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):586-95. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01100.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
4
Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?科研文献中的撤稿:是不当行为还是失误?
Med J Aust. 2006 Aug 7;185(3):152-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00504.x.
5
Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.兽医和动物健康领域撤回文章的综合分析。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Feb 18;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03167-x.
6
Repeating probability of authors with retracted scientific publications.被撤稿科研论文的作者重复发表概率。
Account Res. 2018;25(4):212-219. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1449651. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.多次撤稿的生物医学研究人员首次撤稿后的发表率。
Account Res. 2019 Jul;26(5):277-287. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1612244. Epub 2019 May 14.
8
Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings.与不当行为调查结果相关的科学撤稿和更正。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Jan;39(1):46-50. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100766. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
9
Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.发表不当行为和抄袭撤稿:一项系统的、回顾性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Oct;28(10):1575-83. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.728131. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review.撤稿文献及其在牙科学文献中的引用:系统评价。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Aug;6(4):383-390. doi: 10.1002/cre2.292. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
What Can We Learn from the Retraction of Medical Articles.我们能从医学文章的撤稿中学到什么?
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 21;35(1):497-501. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02171-0. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Retractions in Otolaryngology Publications.耳鼻喉科学出版物中的撤稿情况。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 May 1;151(5):458-465. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0018.
3
Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science.科学文献中的撤稿文章:2003年至2022年使用Web of Science进行的文献计量分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature.撤回的科学文献中的错误来源。
FASEB J. 2014 Sep;28(9):3847-55. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-256735. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
2
Research misconduct oversight: defining case costs.科研不端行为监督:界定案件成本。
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Winter;40(2):75-99.
3
Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign.为什么越来越多的撤稿是(主要)一个好迹象。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 26;10(20):e38620. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
4
Investigation of research quality and transparency in neurosurgery through the utilization of open science practices.通过利用开放科学实践调查神经外科学研究的质量和透明度。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 8;47(1):750. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03008-5.
5
Characteristics of retracted articles in ophthalmology.眼科撤稿文章的特征。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 30;10(15):e35460. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35460. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
6
Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023.与科研不端行为行政处分严重程度相关的因素:对1993年至2023年科研诚信办公室案例摘要的分析
Account Res. 2025 Apr;32(3):417-438. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2287046. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
7
Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct.化学领域撤稿论文分析:错误与不当行为
ACS Omega. 2023 Aug 21;8(35):31568-31574. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03689. eCollection 2023 Sep 5.
8
Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing: Part 2: Off-Label Marketing-Consequences for Patients, Clinicians, and Researchers.药品未按批准用途使用与药品未按批准用途营销:第2部分:药品未按批准用途营销对患者、临床医生和研究人员的影响
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2023 Mar 27;8(3):359-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.12.012. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Research integrity guidelines in the academic environment: The context of Brazilian institutions with retracted publications in health and life sciences.学术环境中的研究诚信指南:巴西机构在健康与生命科学领域撤回出版物的背景情况。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Oct 28;7:991836. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.991836. eCollection 2022.
10
Sharing of retracted COVID-19 articles: an altmetric study.撤回的 COVID-19 文章共享:一项计量研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):97-102. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1269.
PLoS Med. 2013 Dec;10(12):e1001563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
4
The retraction penalty: evidence from the Web of Science.撤稿处罚:来自科学网的证据。
Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 6;3:3146. doi: 10.1038/srep03146.
5
Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?为什么科学撤稿的数量增加了?
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 8;8(7):e68397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068397. Print 2013.
6
Boldt: the great pretender.博尔特:伟大的伪装者。
BMJ. 2013 Mar 19;346:f1738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1738.
7
Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.羟乙基淀粉给药与需要容量复苏的危重症患者死亡率和急性肾损伤的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):678-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.430.
8
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.不当行为导致了大多数被撤回的科学出版物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
9
Unique author identifier; what are we waiting for?唯一作者标识符;我们还在等什么?
J Med Genet. 2012 Feb;49(2):75. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100736.
10
Reforming science: methodological and cultural reforms.改革科学:方法学和文化的改革。
Infect Immun. 2012 Mar;80(3):891-6. doi: 10.1128/IAI.06183-11. Epub 2011 Dec 19.