Pype Peter, Symons Linda, Wens Johan, Van den Eynden Bart, Stes Ann, Deveugele Myriam
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, UZ-6 K3, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Feb 19;15:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-36.
There is a growing need for palliative care. The majority of palliative patients prefer their general practitioner (GP) to organize their palliative home care. General practitioners need a range of competences to perform this task. However, there has been no general description so far of how GPs keep these competences up-to-date. The present study explores current experiences, views and preferences towards training and education in palliative care among GPs, palliative home-care professionals and professionals from organizations who provide training and education.
Five focus groups were brought together in Belgium, with a total of 29 participants, including members of the three categories mentioned above. They were analysed using a constant comparison method.
The analysis revealed that undergraduate education and continuing medical education (CME) while in practice, is insufficient to prepare GPs for their palliative work. Workplace learning (WPL) through collaboration with specialized palliative home-care nurses seems to be a valuable alternative.
The effectiveness of undergraduate education might be enhanced by adding practical experience. Providers of continuing medical education should look to organize interactive, practice-based and interprofessional sessions. Therefore, teachers need to be trained to run small group discussions. In order to optimize workplace learning, health care professionals should be trained to monitor each other's practice and to provide effective feedback. Further research is needed to clarify which aspects of interprofessional teamwork (e.g. professional hierarchy, agreements on tasks and responsibilities) influence the effectiveness of workplace learning.
对姑息治疗的需求日益增长。大多数姑息治疗患者希望他们的全科医生(GP)来安排他们的姑息居家护理。全科医生需要一系列能力来完成这项任务。然而,到目前为止,还没有对全科医生如何保持这些能力与时俱进进行总体描述。本研究探讨了全科医生、姑息居家护理专业人员以及提供培训和教育的组织的专业人员对姑息治疗培训和教育的当前经验、观点和偏好。
在比利时召集了五个焦点小组,共有29名参与者,包括上述三类人员。使用持续比较法对他们进行了分析。
分析表明,本科教育和在职继续医学教育(CME)不足以让全科医生为其姑息治疗工作做好准备。通过与专业姑息居家护理护士合作进行的工作场所学习(WPL)似乎是一种有价值的替代方法。
增加实践经验可能会提高本科教育的有效性。继续医学教育提供者应寻求组织互动式、基于实践的跨专业课程。因此,需要对教师进行培训,以开展小组讨论。为了优化工作场所学习,医疗保健专业人员应接受培训,以相互监督实践并提供有效的反馈。需要进一步研究以阐明跨专业团队合作的哪些方面(例如专业等级、任务和责任协议)会影响工作场所学习的有效性。