• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性脑血管损伤筛查指南:我们愿意遗漏什么?

Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening guidelines: what are we willing to miss?

机构信息

From the University of Maryland Medical Center (B.R.B., R.T., C.S., A.L., T.M.S., D.M.S.), Shock Trauma and Anesthesiology Research-Organized Research Center (J.K.), R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):691-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b4d.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b4d
PMID:24553535
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is reported to occur in approximately 2% of blunt trauma patients, with a stroke rate of up to 20%. Guidelines for BCVI screening are based on clinical and radiographic findings. We hypothesized that liberal screening of the neck vasculature, as part of initial computed tomographic (CT) imaging in blunt trauma patients with significant mechanisms of injury, identifies BCVI that may go undetected.

METHODS

As per protocol, patients at risk for significant injuries undergo a noncontrast head CT scan followed by a multislice CT scan (40-slice or 64-slice) incorporating an intravenous contrast-enhanced pass from the circle of Willis through the pelvis (whole-body CT [WBCT] scan). The trauma registry was retrospectively reviewed, and all patients with BCVI from 2009 to 2012 were analyzed. Patients undergoing WBCT scan were then identified, and records were reviewed for BCVI indicators (skull base fracture, cervical spine injury, displaced facial fracture, mandible fracture, Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, flexion mechanism, hard signs of neck vascular injury, or focal neurologic deficit).

RESULTS

Of 16,026 patients evaluated during the study period, 256 (1.6%) were diagnosed with BCVI. The population consisted of 185 patients with suspected BCVI after WBCT scan. One hundred twenty-nine patients (70%) had at least one indicator for BCVI screening, while 56 (30%) had no radiographic or clinical risk factors; 48 of the 56 patients underwent confirmatory CT angiography of the neck within 71 hours of initial WBCT scan, with 35 patients having 45 injuries.

CONCLUSION

More liberalized screening for BCVI during initial CT imaging in trauma patients clinically judged to have sufficient mechanism is warranted. Using current BCVI screening guidelines leads to missed BCVI and risk of stroke.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level III.

摘要

背景

据报道,钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)在大约 2%的钝性创伤患者中发生,其卒中发生率高达 20%。BCVI 筛查指南基于临床和影像学发现。我们假设,在机制严重的钝性创伤患者中,作为初始计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的一部分,广泛筛查颈部血管,可发现可能未被发现的 BCVI。

方法

根据方案,有发生重大损伤风险的患者行非增强头部 CT 扫描,然后行多层 CT 扫描(40 层或 64 层),包括从 Willis 环到骨盆的静脉对比增强通过(全身 CT [WBCT] 扫描)。回顾性审查创伤登记处,并分析了 2009 年至 2012 年所有的 BCVI 患者。然后确定行 WBCT 扫描的患者,并回顾记录 BCVI 指标(颅底骨折、颈椎损伤、移位面骨骨折、下颌骨骨折、格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤8、屈曲机制、颈血管损伤的硬体征或局灶性神经功能缺损)。

结果

在研究期间评估的 16026 例患者中,有 256 例(1.6%)被诊断为 BCVI。该人群包括 WBCT 扫描后疑似 BCVI 的 185 例患者。129 例患者(70%)至少有一项 BCVI 筛查指标,而 56 例患者(30%)无影像学或临床危险因素;56 例患者中有 48 例在初始 WBCT 扫描后 71 小时内行颈部 CT 血管造影检查,其中 35 例患者有 45 处损伤。

结论

在临床上判断机制充分的创伤患者的初始 CT 成像中,更广泛地筛查 BCVI 是合理的。使用当前的 BCVI 筛查指南会导致 BCVI 漏诊和卒中风险。

证据水平

诊断研究,III 级。

相似文献

1
Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening guidelines: what are we willing to miss?钝性脑血管损伤筛查指南:我们愿意遗漏什么?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):691-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b4d.
2
Initial screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Validity assessment of whole-body computed tomography.钝性脑血管损伤的初始筛查试验:全身计算机断层扫描的有效性评估
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):627-35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.063. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
3
Risk factors for traumatic blunt cerebrovascular injury diagnosed by computed tomography angiography in the pediatric population: a retrospective cohort study.计算机断层血管造影诊断儿童创伤性钝性脑血管损伤的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Jun;15(6):599-606. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.PEDS14397. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
4
A multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for blunt cerebrovascular injury.多变量逻辑回归分析钝性脑血管损伤的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.071. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
5
Blunt cerebrovascular injury: The case for universal screening.钝性脑血管损伤:普遍筛查的理由。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Nov;89(5):880-886. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002824.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of different clinical screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injuries compared with liberal state of the art computed tomography angiography in major trauma.不同临床筛查标准对钝性脑血管损伤的诊断准确性与大创伤中自由状态的先进 CT 血管造影比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):789-795. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002682.
7
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter?钝性脑血管损伤:治疗是否总是至关重要?
J Trauma. 2009 Jan;66(1):132-43; discussion 143-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d146.
8
Cervical spine fracture patterns mandating screening to rule out blunt cerebrovascular injury.需要进行筛查以排除钝性脑血管损伤的颈椎骨折类型。
Surgery. 2007 Jan;141(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
9
CTA-based screening reduces time to diagnosis and stroke rate in blunt cervical vascular injury.基于CT血管造影的筛查可缩短钝性颈部血管损伤的诊断时间并降低中风发生率。
J Trauma. 2009 Sep;67(3):551-6; discussion 555-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b84408.
10
Prospective screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: analysis of diagnostic modalities and outcomes.钝性脑血管损伤的前瞻性筛查:诊断方式及结果分析
Ann Surg. 2002 Sep;236(3):386-93; discussion 393-5. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000027174.01008.A0.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of circle of willis anatomy and scanning practices on outcomes for blunt cerebrovascular injuries.Willis 环解剖结构和扫描实践对钝性脑血管损伤结果的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jun 17;32(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01225-x.
2
The value of computed tomography angiography in predicting the surgical effect and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury.计算机断层血管造影术在预测严重创伤性脑损伤手术效果和预后中的价值。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52385-w.
3
Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury: Are We Overscreening Low-Mechanism Trauma?
钝性脑血管损伤:我们是否过度筛查低机制创伤?
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Nov;44(11):1296-1301. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8004. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
4
Routine CTA screening identifies blunt cerebrovascular injuries missed by clinical risk factors.常规CT血管造影筛查可发现临床危险因素遗漏的钝性脑血管损伤。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Aug 26;7(1):e000924. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000924. eCollection 2022.
5
Current Concepts in Imaging Diagnosis and Screening of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries.目前关于钝性脑血管损伤的影像学诊断和筛查的概念。
Tomography. 2022 Feb 7;8(1):402-413. doi: 10.3390/tomography8010033.
6
Variability of radiological grading of blunt cerebrovascular injuries in trauma patients.创伤患者钝性脑血管损伤的放射学分级变异性
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Apr-Jun;10(2):81-87. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_103_19. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Predictors for Pediatric Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury (BCVI): An International Multicenter Analysis.小儿钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的预测因素:一项国际多中心分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Sep;43(9):2337-2347. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05041-8.
8
Augmenting Denver criteria yields increased BCVI detection, with screening showing markedly increased risk for subsequent ischemic stroke.强化丹佛标准可提高钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的检测率,筛查显示后续缺血性卒中风险显著增加。
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01677-0. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.钝性脑血管损伤的处理。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Oct 23;18(12):98. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0906-7.
10
Blunt traumatic vascular injuries of the head and neck in the ED.急诊科中头颈部钝性创伤性血管损伤
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1630-y. Epub 2018 Aug 10.