Ramich Tatjana, Schacher Beate, Scharf Susanne, Röllke Lasse, Arndt Rita, Eickholz Peter, Nickles Katrin
Department of Periodontology, Centre for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7 (Haus 29), 60596, Frankfurt, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jan;19(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1208-3. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
This study aimed to make a comparison of two sampling strategies of subgingival plaque after combined mechanical-antibiotic periodontal therapy.
Thirty patients (18 female) suffering from aggressive (n = 12) or generalised severe chronic (n = 18) periodontitis were included. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans had been detected subgingivally in all prior to anti-infective therapy (AT) and combined mechanical-antibiotic AT had been rendered. After AT clinical examinations were performed and subgingival plaque was sampled from the same four sites as prior to AT (ASPRE) as well as from the four deepest sites after AT (DEEP). Per patient two pooled samples (ASPRE/DEEP) were generated and analysed for A. actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola using a commercial 16S rRNA test.
ASPRE failed to detect A. actinomycetemcomitans, DEEP detected A. actinomycetemcomitans only in two patients (7 %). Only for T. forsythia DEEP (53 %) provided higher detection frequencies than ASPRE (27 %; p = 0.005). Detection frequencies of P. gingivalis and T. denticola ranged from 47 to 53 %.
After combined mechanical-antibiotic AT sampling the deepest sites revealed higher detection rates. Combined mechanical-antibiotic AT suppresses A. actinomycetemcomitans to a higher extent than P. gingivalis, T. forsythia and T. denticola.
本研究旨在比较联合机械-抗生素牙周治疗后龈下菌斑的两种采样策略。
纳入30例患者(18例女性),其中侵袭性牙周炎患者12例,广泛性重度慢性牙周炎患者18例。在所有患者进行抗感染治疗(AT)之前,龈下均检测到伴放线聚集杆菌,且已进行联合机械-抗生素AT治疗。AT治疗后进行临床检查,并从与AT治疗前相同的四个部位(ASPRE)以及AT治疗后四个最深部位(DEEP)采集龈下菌斑。为每位患者生成两个混合样本(ASPRE/DEEP),并使用商业16S rRNA检测法分析其中的伴放线聚集杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦氏菌和齿垢密螺旋体。
ASPRE未能检测到伴放线聚集杆菌,DEEP仅在两名患者(7%)中检测到伴放线聚集杆菌。仅对于福赛坦氏菌,DEEP(53%)的检测频率高于ASPRE(27%;p = 0.005)。牙龈卟啉单胞菌和齿垢密螺旋体的检测频率在47%至53%之间。
联合机械-抗生素AT治疗后,对最深部位进行采样显示出更高的检出率。联合机械-抗生素AT治疗对伴放线聚集杆菌的抑制程度高于牙龈卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦氏菌和齿垢密螺旋体。