Giusti Laura, Mantua Valentina, Da Valle Ylenia, Ciregia Federica, Ventroni Tiziana, Orsolini Ginevra, Donadio Elena, Giannaccini Gino, Mauri Mauro, Cassano Giovanni Battista, Lucacchini Antonio
Department of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Mol Biosyst. 2014 Jun;10(6):1246-54. doi: 10.1039/c4mb00068d. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
Data on neurobiological mechanisms underlying mood disorders are elusive; the aetiology of such states is multifactorial, including genetic predisposition and environmental factors. Diagnosis is currently being made only on an interview-based methodology. Biological markers, which could improve the current classification, and in perspective, stratify patients on a biological basis into more homogeneous clinically distinct subgroups, are highly needed. We describe here a comparative proteomic analysis of peripheral lymphocytes from patients affected by acute psychotic bipolar disorder (PBD) (n = 15), major depressive episode (MDE) with no personal or family history of psychosis (n = 11), and a group of demographically matched healthy controls (HC) (n = 15). All patients were evaluated by means of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-Patient version (SCID-I-P), Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) questionnaires. Blood lymphocytes were obtained by gradient separation, and 2-DE was carried out on protein extracts. Significant differences in protein patterns among the three groups were observed. Thirty-six protein spots were found to be differentially expressed in patients compared to controls, which collapsed into 25 different proteins after mass spectrometry identification. Twenty-one of these proteins failed to discriminate between PBD and MDE, suggesting common signatures for these disorders. Nevertheless, after the western blot validation only two of the remaining proteins, namely LIM and SH3 domain protein1, and short-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase mitochondrial protein, resulted in being significantly upregulated in PBD samples suggesting additional mechanisms that could be associated with the psychotic features of bipolar disorder.
情绪障碍背后的神经生物学机制的数据难以捉摸;此类状态的病因是多因素的,包括遗传易感性和环境因素。目前仅基于访谈方法进行诊断。迫切需要生物标志物,其可以改善当前的分类,并从长远来看,在生物学基础上对患者进行分层,以形成更同质的临床不同亚组。我们在此描述了对急性精神病性双相情感障碍(PBD)患者(n = 15)、无个人或家族精神病病史的重度抑郁发作(MDE)患者(n = 11)以及一组人口统计学匹配的健康对照(HC)(n = 15)的外周淋巴细胞进行的比较蛋白质组学分析。所有患者均通过DSM-IV-患者版结构化临床访谈(SCID-I-P)、阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAM-A)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D-17)问卷进行评估。通过梯度分离获得血淋巴细胞,并对蛋白质提取物进行二维电泳。观察到三组之间蛋白质模式存在显著差异。与对照组相比,在患者中发现36个蛋白点差异表达,质谱鉴定后这些蛋白点归为25种不同的蛋白质。其中21种蛋白质无法区分PBD和MDE,表明这些疾病具有共同特征。然而,经过蛋白质印迹验证后,其余蛋白质中只有两种,即LIM和SH3结构域蛋白1以及短链特异性酰基辅酶A脱氢酶线粒体蛋白,在PBD样本中显著上调,提示可能与双相情感障碍的精神病性特征相关的其他机制。