Munson Erik, Schroeder Elizabeth R, Ross Kevin C, Yauck Connie, Bieganski Theresa, Amrhein Robert D, Napierala Maureen, Harkins April L
Wheaton Franciscan Laboratory, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 May;52(5):1448-52. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03624-13. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
Two important preanalytical protocols performed on liquid-based cytological specimens, namely, automated cytology processing and glacial acetic acid (GAA) treatment, may occur prior to the arrival of specimens in a molecular diagnostics laboratory. Ninety-two ThinPrep vials previously positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) via the Cervista HPV HR test were preselected and alternated with 92 previously negative ThinPrep vials. The specimen set was processed in a consecutive fashion by an automated cytology processor without fastidious decontamination precautions. Carryover potential was subsequently assessed by performance of the Aptima HPV assay on aliquots from reprocessed ThinPrep vials. All previously negative ThinPrep vials yielded a negative result following routine automated cytology processing, despite close proximity to known-positive ThinPrep vials. In separate experiments, aliquots from 236 ThinPrep vials were forwarded for tandem analysis with and without GAA treatment. Data from GAA- and mock-treated specimens generated by Aptima HPV were compared to correlate data generated by Cervista. A 99.2% concordance of Aptima HPV results from GAA-treated and mock-treated specimens was noted. This result differed from the concordance result derived from Cervista (91.5%; P<0.0002). Of the initially positive Cervista results, 21.9% reverted to negative following GAA treatment; the correlate value was 2.7% for Aptima HPV (P=0.01). While deleterious effects of GAA treatment on genomic DNA were noted with Cervista (P=0.0015), GAA treatment had no significant effects on Aptima HPV specimen signal/cutoff ratios or amplification of internal control RNA (P≥0.07). The validity of an Aptima HPV result is independent of GAA treatment and routine automated cytology processing.
在液基细胞学标本上执行的两项重要的分析前方案,即自动化细胞学处理和冰醋酸(GAA)处理,可能在标本到达分子诊断实验室之前就已进行。预先选择了92个通过Cervista高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测呈阳性的ThinPrep样本瓶,并与92个先前呈阴性的ThinPrep样本瓶交替排列。样本集由自动化细胞学处理器以连续方式处理,未采取严格的去污预防措施。随后通过对重新处理的ThinPrep样本瓶的等分试样进行Aptima HPV检测来评估残留可能性。尽管与已知阳性的ThinPrep样本瓶距离很近,但所有先前阴性的ThinPrep样本瓶在常规自动化细胞学处理后均产生阴性结果。在单独的实验中,将236个ThinPrep样本瓶的等分试样分别送去进行有无GAA处理的串联分析。比较了Aptima HPV检测的GAA处理和模拟处理标本的数据,以关联Cervista产生的数据。结果发现,GAA处理和模拟处理标本的Aptima HPV结果一致性为99.2%。该结果与Cervista得出的一致性结果(91.5%;P<0.0002)不同。在最初Cervista检测呈阳性的结果中,21.9%在GAA处理后转为阴性;Aptima HPV的相关值为2.7%(P=0.01)。虽然Cervista检测发现GAA处理对基因组DNA有有害影响(P=0.0015),但GAA处理对Aptima HPV标本的信号/截断值比率或内部对照RNA的扩增没有显著影响(P≥0.07)。Aptima HPV结果的有效性与GAA处理和常规自动化细胞学处理无关。