Public Health Laboratory, 100 Forest Road, St. John's, NL A1A 3Z9, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):557-64. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02147-10. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 oncogene expression may be more predictive of cervical cancer risk than testing for HPV DNA. The Aptima HPV test (Gen-Probe) detects E6/E7 mRNA of 14 oncogenic types. Its clinical performance was compared with that of the Hybrid Capture 2 DNA test (HC2; Qiagen) in women referred for colposcopy and those routinely screened. Aptima was also compared with the PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA assay (Proofer; Norchip) in the referral population. Cervical specimens collected in PreservCyt (Hologic Inc.) were processed for HPV detection and genotyping with the Linear Array (LA) method (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Laval, Quebec, Canada). Histology-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2) or worse (CIN 2+) served as the disease endpoint. On the basis of 1,418 referral cases (CIN 2+, n = 401), the sensitivity of Aptima was 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.4, 98.2), whereas it was 94.3% (95% CI, 92.0, 96.6) for HC2. The specificities were 43.2% (95% CI, 40.2, 46.2) and 38.7% (95% CI, 35.7, 41.7), respectively (P < 0.05). In 1,373 women undergoing routine screening (CIN 2+, n = 7), both Aptima and HC2 showed 100% sensitivity, and the specificities were 88.3% (95% CI, 86.6, 90.0) and 85.3% (95% CI, 83.5, 87.3), respectively (P < 0.05); for women ≥ 30 years of age (n = 845), the specificities were 93.9% (95% CI, 92.3, 95.5) and 92.1% (95% CI, 90.3, 93.9), respectively (P < 0.05). On the basis of 818 referral cases (CIN 2+, n = 235), the sensitivity of Aptima was 94.9% (95% CI, 92.1, 97.7) and that of Proofer was 79.1% (95% CI, 73.9, 84.3), and the specificities were 45.8% (95% CI, 41.8, 49.8) and 75.1% (95% CI, 71.6, 78.6), respectively (P < 0.05). Both Aptima and Proofer showed a higher degree of agreement with LA genotyping than HC2. In conclusion, the Aptima test is as sensitive as HC2 but more specific for detecting CIN 2+ and can serve as a reliable test for both primary cervical cancer screening and the triage of borderline cytological abnormalities.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)E6/E7 致癌基因表达的检测可能比 HPV DNA 检测更能预测宫颈癌风险。Aptima HPV 检测(基因探针)检测 14 种致癌类型的 E6/E7 mRNA。其临床性能与 Hybrid Capture 2 DNA 检测(HC2;Qiagen)在转诊行阴道镜检查和常规筛查的女性中进行了比较。Aptima 还与 PreTect HPV-Proofer E6/E7 mRNA 检测(Proofer;Norchip)在转诊人群中进行了比较。在 PreservCyt(Hologic Inc.)中收集的宫颈标本用 Linear Array(LA)方法(罗氏分子诊断,魁北克省拉瓦尔)进行 HPV 检测和基因分型。组织学证实的高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN 2)或更高级别病变(CIN 2+)作为疾病终点。基于 1418 例转诊病例(CIN 2+,n=401),Aptima 的敏感性为 96.3%(95%置信区间[CI],94.4,98.2),而 HC2 的敏感性为 94.3%(95% CI,92.0,96.6)。特异性分别为 43.2%(95% CI,40.2,46.2)和 38.7%(95% CI,35.7,41.7)(P<0.05)。在 1373 例常规筛查女性(CIN 2+,n=7)中,Aptima 和 HC2 均显示出 100%的敏感性,特异性分别为 88.3%(95% CI,86.6,90.0)和 85.3%(95% CI,83.5,87.3)(P<0.05);对于年龄≥30 岁的女性(n=845),特异性分别为 93.9%(95% CI,92.3,95.5)和 92.1%(95% CI,90.3,93.9)(P<0.05)。基于 818 例转诊病例(CIN 2+,n=235),Aptima 的敏感性为 94.9%(95% CI,92.1,97.7),Proofer 的敏感性为 79.1%(95% CI,73.9,84.3),特异性分别为 45.8%(95% CI,41.8,49.8)和 75.1%(95% CI,71.6,78.6)(P<0.05)。Aptima 和 Proofer 与 LA 基因分型的一致性均高于 HC2。总之,Aptima 检测与 HC2 一样敏感,但对 CIN 2+的特异性更高,可作为宫颈癌初筛和边界细胞学异常分流的可靠检测方法。