Suppr超能文献

医院医学与老年医学交叉领域以患者为中心的研究议程路线图。

Road map to a patient-centered research agenda at the intersection of hospital medicine and geriatric medicine.

作者信息

Wald Heidi L, Leykum Luci K, Mattison Melissa L P, Vasilevskis Eduard E, Meltzer David O

机构信息

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Campus Box F480 13199 E. Montview Blvd, Suite 400, Aurora, CO, 80024, USA,

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):926-31. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2777-1.

Abstract

As the United States ages, the patient population in acute care hospitals is increasingly older and more medically complex. Despite evidence of a high burden of disease, high costs, and often poor outcomes of care, there is limited understanding of the presentation, diagnostic strategies, and management of acute illness in older adults. In this paper, we present a strategy for the development of a research agenda at the intersection of hospital and geriatric medicine. This approach is informed by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) framework for identification and prioritization of research areas, emphasizing input from patients and caregivers. The framework's four components are: 1) Topic generation, 2) Gap Analysis in Systematic Review, 3) Value of information (VOI) analysis, and 4) Peer Review. An inclusive process for topic generation requiring the systematic engagement of multiple stakeholders, especially patients, is emphasized. In subsequent steps, researchers and stakeholders prioritize research topics in order to identify areas that optimize patient-centeredness, population impact, impact on clinical decision making, ease of implementation, and durability. Finally, next steps for dissemination of the research agenda and evaluation of the impact of the patient-centered research prioritization process are described.

摘要

随着美国人口老龄化,急症医院的患者群体年龄越来越大,医疗情况也越来越复杂。尽管有证据表明疾病负担重、成本高且护理结果往往不佳,但对于老年人急性疾病的表现、诊断策略和管理的了解却很有限。在本文中,我们提出了一项在医院医学和老年医学交叉领域制定研究议程的策略。这种方法是受患者为中心的结果研究机构(PCORI)用于确定研究领域并对其进行优先排序的框架所启发,强调患者和护理人员的意见。该框架的四个组成部分是:1)主题生成,2)系统评价中的差距分析,3)信息价值(VOI)分析,以及4)同行评审。强调了一个包容性的主题生成过程,该过程需要多个利益相关者,尤其是患者的系统参与。在后续步骤中,研究人员和利益相关者对研究主题进行优先排序,以确定在以患者为中心、人群影响、对临床决策的影响、实施的难易程度和持续性方面最优化的领域。最后,描述了研究议程传播的后续步骤以及对以患者为中心的研究优先排序过程影响的评估。

相似文献

3
A patient-centered research agenda for the care of the acutely ill older patient.
J Hosp Med. 2015 May;10(5):318-27. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2356. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Patient-centered Research Agenda: Lessons Learned From the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet).
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S27-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000785.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: the intersection of science and health care.
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Jun 23;2(37):37cm18. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001235.
10
A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network.
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S22-S26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000778.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to prioritising primary health research: a scoping review.
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007465.
3
Value of Information: A Tool to Improve Research Prioritization and Reduce Waste.
PLoS Med. 2015 Sep 29;12(9):e1001882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001882. eCollection 2015 Sep.
5
A patient-centered research agenda for the care of the acutely ill older patient.
J Hosp Med. 2015 May;10(5):318-27. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2356. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
6
The changing face of general internal medicine and lessons learned from geriatric medicine.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):824-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2799-8.
7
Advancing geriatrics research, education, and practice: policy challenges after the great recession.
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):920-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2763-z.

本文引用的文献

1
What is known about adverse events in older medical hospital inpatients? A systematic review of the literature.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Oct;25(5):542-54. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt056. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
2
Minimal modeling approaches to value of information analysis for health research.
Med Decis Making. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):E1-E22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11412975. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
3
Examining the evidence: a systematic review of the inclusion and analysis of older adults in randomized controlled trials.
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul;26(7):783-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1629-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary.
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Oct 26(29):1-20, 24.
6
Growth in the care of older patients by hospitalists in the United States.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 12;360(11):1102-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802381.
9
Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):531-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
10
Improving health care for older persons.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Sep 2;139(5 Pt 2):421-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_2-200309021-00008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验