• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功的慢性病老年综合护理模式:为美国医学研究所“为老龄化美国重新装备”报告提供证据。

Successful models of comprehensive care for older adults with chronic conditions: evidence for the Institute of Medicine's "retooling for an aging America" report.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Dec;57(12):2328-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02571.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02571.x
PMID:20121991
Abstract

The quality of chronic care in America is low, and the cost is high. To help inform efforts to overhaul the ailing U.S. healthcare system, including those related to the "medical home," models of comprehensive health care that have shown the potential to improve the quality, efficiency, or health-related outcomes of care for chronically ill older persons were identified. Using multiple indexing terms, the MEDLINE database was searched for articles published in English between January 1, 1987, and May 30, 2008, that reported statistically significant positive outcomes from high-quality research on models of comprehensive health care for older persons with chronic conditions. Each selected study addressed a model of comprehensive health care; was a meta-analysis, systematic review, or trial with an equivalent concurrent control group; included an adequate number of representative, chronically ill participants aged 65 and older; used valid measures; used reliable methods of data collection; analyzed data rigorously; and reported significantly positive effects on the quality, efficiency, or health-related outcomes of care. Of 2,714 identified articles, 123 (4.5%) met these criteria. Fifteen models have improved at least one outcome: interdisciplinary primary care (1), models that supplement primary care (8), transitional care (1), models of acute care in patients' homes (2), nurse-physician teams for residents of nursing homes (1), and models of comprehensive care in hospitals (2). Policy makers and healthcare leaders should consider including these 15 models of health care in plans to reform the U.S. healthcare system. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services would need new statutory flexibility to pay for care by the nurses, social workers, pharmacists, and physicians who staff these promising models.

摘要

美国的慢性病护理质量低,成本高。为了帮助改进美国病态的医疗体系,包括与“医疗之家”相关的改革,确定了综合医疗保健模式,这些模式显示出有可能提高慢性病老年患者的护理质量、效率或健康相关结果。使用多个索引术语,在 MEDLINE 数据库中搜索了 1987 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 5 月 30 日期间发表的英文文章,这些文章报道了高质量研究对慢性病老年患者综合医疗保健模式的统计显著积极结果。每个选定的研究都涉及综合医疗保健模式;是一项荟萃分析、系统评价或具有等效同期对照组的试验;纳入了足够数量的有代表性的、患有慢性病的 65 岁及以上参与者;使用了有效的测量方法;使用了可靠的数据收集方法;严格分析了数据;并报告了对护理质量、效率或健康相关结果的显著积极影响。在确定的 2714 篇文章中,有 123 篇(4.5%)符合这些标准。有 15 种模式至少改善了一个结果:跨学科的初级保健(1)、补充初级保健的模式(8)、过渡性护理(1)、患者家中急性护理模式(2)、疗养院居民的护士-医师团队(1)以及医院综合护理模式(2)。政策制定者和医疗保健领导者应该考虑将这 15 种医疗保健模式纳入改革美国医疗体系的计划中。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心需要新的法定灵活性,以便为这些有前途的模式配备的护士、社会工作者、药剂师和医生支付护理费用。

相似文献

1
Successful models of comprehensive care for older adults with chronic conditions: evidence for the Institute of Medicine's "retooling for an aging America" report.成功的慢性病老年综合护理模式:为美国医学研究所“为老龄化美国重新装备”报告提供证据。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Dec;57(12):2328-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02571.x.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Gerontology in Public Health: A Scoping Review of Current Perspectives and Interventions.公共卫生领域的老年学:当前观点与干预措施的范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65896. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65896. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for people with both COPD and frailty starting pulmonary rehabilitation: a mixed-methods feasibility trial.对同时患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和身体虚弱的患者开展综合老年评估并启动肺康复:一项混合方法可行性试验。
ERJ Open Res. 2024 Jul 29;10(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00774-2023. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Caring for Patients with Functional Impairment in Middle Age: Perspectives from Primary Care Providers and Geriatricians.
照顾中年有功能障碍的患者:初级保健提供者和老年病学家的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2292-2299. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08701-1. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
The outcomes of treatment for homebound adults with complex medical conditions in a hospital-at-home unit in the southern district of Israel.以色列南部地区医院内家庭病房中患有复杂疾病的居家成年人的治疗结果。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Feb 14;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00595-y.
5
Evaluating Person-Centred Integrated Care to People with Complex Chronic Conditions: Early Implementation Results of the ProPCC Programme.评估针对复杂慢性病患者的以患者为中心的综合护理:ProPCC项目的早期实施结果
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Dec 13;23(4):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7585. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
6
Caring for high-need patients.照顾高需求患者。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):1289. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10236-w.
7
Understanding care coordination for Veterans with complex care needs: protocol of a multiple-methods study to build evidence for an effectiveness and implementation study.了解有复杂护理需求的退伍军人的护理协调:一项为有效性和实施研究建立证据的多方法研究方案
Front Health Serv. 2023 Aug 15;3:1211577. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1211577. eCollection 2023.
8
Lack of geriatricians in aging-related national media talks.老龄化相关的全国性媒体讨论中缺乏老年医学专家。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2328-2330. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18313. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
9
Who gets access to an interprofessional team-based primary care programme for patients with complex health and social needs? A cross-sectional analysis.谁可以获得针对有复杂健康和社会需求的患者的跨专业团队式初级保健项目的服务?一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e065362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065362.
10
Nursing care and models of care in relation to older people in long-term care contexts: a scoping review protocol.长期护理环境中与老年人相关的护理关怀和护理模式:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e064610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064610.