Suppr超能文献

对血浆样本中HIV病毒载量检测技术性能的系统评价。

Systematic review of the performance of HIV viral load technologies on plasma samples.

作者信息

Sollis Kimberly A, Smit Pieter W, Fiscus Susan, Ford Nathan, Vitoria Marco, Essajee Shaffiq, Barnett David, Cheng Ben, Crowe Suzanne M, Denny Thomas, Landay Alan, Stevens Wendy, Habiyambere Vincent, Perrins Jos, Peeling Rosanna W

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e85869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085869. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Viral load (VL) monitoring is the standard of care in developing country settings for detecting HIV treatment failure. Since 2010 the World Health Organization has recommended a phase-in approach to VL monitoring in resource-limited settings. We conducted a systematic review of the accuracy and precision of HIV VL technologies for treatment monitoring.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A search of Medline and Embase was conducted for studies evaluating the accuracy or reproducibility of commercially available HIV VL assays. 37 studies were included for review including evaluations of the Amplicor Monitor HIV-1 v1.5 (n = 25), Cobas TaqMan v2.0 (n = 11), Abbott RealTime HIV-1 (n = 23), Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA 3.0 (n = 15), Versant HIV-1 RNA kPCR 1.0 (n = 2), ExaVir Load v3 (n = 2), and NucliSens EasyQ v2.0 (n = 1). All currently available HIV VL assays are of sufficient sensitivity to detect plasma virus levels at a lower detection limit of 1,000 copies/mL. Bias data comparing the Abbott RealTime HIV-1, TaqMan v2.0 to the Amplicor Monitor v1.5 showed a tendency of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 to under-estimate results while the TaqMan v2.0 overestimated VL counts. Compared to the Amplicor Monitor v1.5, 2-26% and 9-70% of results from the Versant bDNA 3.0 and Abbott RealTime HIV-1 differed by greater than 0.5log10. The average intra and inter-assay variation of the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 were 2.95% (range 2.0-5.1%) and 5.44% (range 1.17-30.00%) across the range of VL counts (2log10-7log10).

CONCLUSIONS

This review found that all currently available HIV VL assays are of sufficient sensitivity to detect plasma VL of 1,000 copies/mL as a threshold to initiate investigations of treatment adherence or possible treatment failure. Sources of variability between VL assays include differences in technology platform, plasma input volume, and ability to detect HIV-1 subtypes. Monitoring of individual patients should be performed on the same technology platform to ensure appropriate interpretation of changes in VL. Prospero registration # CD42013003603.

摘要

背景

病毒载量(VL)监测是发展中国家检测HIV治疗失败的标准治疗手段。自2010年以来,世界卫生组织建议在资源有限的环境中逐步采用VL监测方法。我们对用于治疗监测的HIV VL技术的准确性和精密度进行了系统评价。

方法与结果

检索Medline和Embase数据库,查找评估商用HIV VL检测方法准确性或可重复性的研究。纳入37项研究进行综述,包括对Amplicor Monitor HIV-1 v1.5(n = 25)、Cobas TaqMan v2.0(n = 11)、雅培实时HIV-1(Abbott RealTime HIV-1,n = 23)、Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA 3.0(n = 15)、Versant HIV-1 RNA kPCR 1.0(n = 2)、ExaVir Load v3(n = 2)和NucliSens EasyQ v2.0(n = 1)的评估。所有目前可用的HIV VL检测方法都具有足够的灵敏度,能够检测血浆病毒水平,检测下限为1000拷贝/毫升。比较雅培实时HIV-1、TaqMan v2.0与Amplicor Monitor v1.5的偏差数据显示,雅培实时HIV-1有低估结果的趋势,而TaqMan v2.0高估了VL计数。与Amplicor Monitor v1.5相比,Versant bDNA 3.0和雅培实时HIV-1的结果中有2%-26%和9%-70%相差超过0.5log10。在VL计数范围(2log10 - 7log10)内,雅培实时HIV-1的平均批内和批间变异分别为2.95%(范围2.0%-5.1%)和5.44%(范围1.17%-30.00%)。

结论

本综述发现,所有目前可用的HIV VL检测方法都具有足够的灵敏度,能够检测血浆VL为1000拷贝/毫升,以此作为启动治疗依从性调查或可能的治疗失败调查的阈值。VL检测方法之间的变异来源包括技术平台、血浆输入量和检测HIV-1亚型的能力的差异。对个体患者的监测应在同一技术平台上进行,以确保对VL变化进行适当的解读。Prospero注册号#CD42013003603。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94bb/3928047/5bb16e4970bb/pone.0085869.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验