Suppr超能文献

革兰氏染色检查在诊断羊膜腔内感染中的价值与局限性

The value and limitations of the Gram stain examination in the diagnosis of intraamniotic infection.

作者信息

Romero R, Emamian M, Quintero R, Wan M, Hobbins J C, Mazor M, Edberg S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jul;159(1):114-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90503-0.

Abstract

Gram stain examination of amniotic fluid is a method used for the rapid diagnosis of intraamniotic infection in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor. The management of these patients relies heavily on the Gram stain results. Therefore, it is critical that the diagnostic value and limitations, optimal technique, and outcome correlates be precisely established. Most studies have focused on culture results rather than on Gram stain results to describe neonatal and maternal outcome. However, management is based on the Gram stain because culture results are not immediately available. One hundred eighty-seven amniocenteses were performed in 131 patients with preterm premature rupture of the membranes (n = 90) and preterm labor (n = 41). Spun and unspun Gram stains were performed. Centrifugation of the sample did not improve the sensitivity of the technique significantly. The agreement between the two methods was substantial (kappa index 0.89, p less than 0.001). The sensitivity of the Gram stain was 44.8% and the specificity was 97.6%. The sensitivity of the Gram stain was directly proportional to the number of bacteria present in amniotic fluid. In the presence of greater than 10(5) colony forming units per milliliter, 80% of the Gram stains were positive. The absence of both bacteria and white blood cells in a smear was associated with a negative culture of amniotic fluid in 95% of the cases. Clinical chorioamnionitis was associated with a positive Gram stain of amniotic fluid (p less than 0.001). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of endometritis in patients with a positive Gram stain compared with those with a negative Gram stain (p = 0.07). There was no neonatal infectious morbidity in patients with a true negative Gram stain. Patients with a false negative Gram stain had a 25% incidence of neonatal infectious complications (proved and suspected sepsis).

摘要

羊水革兰氏染色检查是一种用于快速诊断胎膜早破和早产患者羊膜腔内感染的方法。这些患者的治疗很大程度上依赖于革兰氏染色结果。因此,准确确定其诊断价值和局限性、最佳技术以及与结局的相关性至关重要。大多数研究关注的是培养结果而非革兰氏染色结果来描述新生儿和母亲的结局。然而,由于培养结果不能立即获得,治疗是基于革兰氏染色的。对131例胎膜早破(n = 90)和早产(n = 41)患者进行了187次羊膜腔穿刺。进行了离心和未离心的革兰氏染色。样本离心并未显著提高该技术的敏感性。两种方法之间的一致性很高(kappa指数0.89,p < 0.001)。革兰氏染色的敏感性为44.8%,特异性为97.6%。革兰氏染色的敏感性与羊水中存在的细菌数量成正比。当每毫升存在大于10⁵个菌落形成单位时,80%的革兰氏染色为阳性。涂片上细菌和白细胞均不存在与95%的羊水培养阴性相关。临床绒毛膜羊膜炎与羊水革兰氏染色阳性相关(p < 0.001)。革兰氏染色阳性的患者与革兰氏染色阴性的患者相比,子宫内膜炎的发生率有升高趋势(p = 0.07)。革兰氏染色真阴性的患者无新生儿感染性发病。革兰氏染色假阴性的患者有25%发生新生儿感染并发症(确诊和疑似败血症)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验