• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

财政激励的失败?剖宫产率似乎不可阻挡的上升。

The failure of financial incentive? The seemingly inexorable rise of cesarean section.

机构信息

Department of Economics, National Taipei University, Taiwan.

Department of Public Finance, National Taipei University, 151, University Rd., San Shia, New Taipei City 237, Taiwan.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.010
PMID:24560223
Abstract

Two policy interventions in Taiwan aiming to slow the growth of cesarean delivery utilization were respectively implemented in 2005 and 2006. The first policy provided financial incentives to encourage vaginal delivery by setting a global fee for obstetric services and in essence increasing the reimbursement for vaginal delivery up to the same level of cesarean section. The second policy aimed to reduce the demand for elective cesarean procedure by employing a copayment when cesarean section is not medically indicated. This paper examines the impact of financial incentives of both the supply and the demand side on the use of utilization of cesarean section using data from the 2003-2008 National Health Insurance Research Database. We found that while the overall trend of cesarean utilization did not seem to respond to the interventions, the policies did have significant impact on its elective use. Financial incentives for the providers do matter, and policy interventions, such as a fee change, are still important strategies to consider in reducing the over-utilization of cesarean section.

摘要

台湾有两项旨在降低剖宫产率的政策干预措施,分别于 2005 年和 2006 年实施。第一项政策通过设定产科服务的总费用,实质上提高了阴道分娩的报销比例,从而为鼓励阴道分娩提供了经济激励。第二项政策则通过在非医学指征剖宫产时收取额外费用来减少选择性剖宫产的需求。本研究利用 2003-2008 年全民健康保险研究数据库的数据,检验了供需双方的经济激励措施对剖宫产使用率的影响。结果发现,尽管剖宫产总体使用率的趋势似乎并未对这些干预措施产生反应,但这些政策确实对选择性剖宫产的使用产生了显著影响。提供者的经济激励措施确实很重要,而且费用调整等政策干预措施仍然是减少剖宫产过度使用的重要策略。

相似文献

1
The failure of financial incentive? The seemingly inexorable rise of cesarean section.财政激励的失败?剖宫产率似乎不可阻挡的上升。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
2
Financial incentives do not always work: an example of cesarean sections in Taiwan.经济激励措施并非总能奏效:以台湾地区剖宫产为例。
Health Policy. 2008 Oct;88(1):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
3
Financial incentives and use of Cesarean delivery: Taiwan birth data 2003 to 2007.经济激励与剖宫产使用率:台湾 2003 至 2007 年分娩数据。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):e35-41.
4
Physician financial incentives and cesarean section delivery.医生的经济激励与剖宫产分娩
Rand J Econ. 1996 Spring;27(1):99-123.
5
Taiwan's high rate of cesarean births: impacts of national health insurance and fetal gender preference.台湾地区剖宫产率居高不下:全民健康保险及胎儿性别偏好的影响
Birth. 2007 Jun;34(2):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00157.x.
6
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.应产妇要求剖宫产:有限资源的明智利用?来自一线的观点。
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):305-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.012.
7
Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.阴道分娩与剖宫产选择中的经济激励因素。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):365-404.
8
Physician financial incentives and cesarean delivery: new conclusions from the healthcare cost and utilization project.医生的经济激励与剖宫产:医疗成本和利用项目的新结论
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
9
Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications.剖宫产率的制度性因素:政策与研究启示
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;103(1):128-36. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000102935.91389.53.
10
National health insurance, physician financial incentives, and primary cesarean deliveries in Taiwan.台湾的国民健康保险、医生经济激励措施与剖宫产率
Am J Public Health. 2002 Sep;92(9):1514-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.9.1514.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of different payment methods on perinatal care outcomes: a systematic review.不同支付方式对围产期护理结局的影响:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):1065. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13160-3.
2
Staff Resources in Public and Private Hospitals and Their Implication for Medical Practice: A French Study of Caesareans.公立和私立医院的人力资源及其对医疗实践的影响:一项关于剖腹产的法国研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 14;12(10):1007. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101007.
3
Interventions targeting healthcare providers to optimise use of caesarean section: a qualitative comparative analysis to identify important intervention features.
针对医疗保健提供者的干预措施以优化剖宫产术的使用:确定重要干预特征的定性比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):1526. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08783-9.
4
Changes in cesarean section rates after introduction of a punitive financial policy in Georgia: A population-based registry study 2017-2019.格鲁吉亚引入惩罚性财政政策后剖宫产率的变化:2017-2019 年基于人群的登记研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0271491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271491. eCollection 2022.
5
Reducing unnecessary caesarean sections: scoping review of financial and regulatory interventions.减少不必要的剖宫产:财务和监管干预措施的范围审查
Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 31;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00983-y.
6
Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.评估 2005 年至 2016 年期间印度公立和私立医疗机构之间剖宫产率的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2015022. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15022.
7
A cluster-randomized field trial to reduce cesarean section rates with a multifaceted intervention in Shanghai, China.一项多层面干预措施降低中国上海剖宫产率的整群随机现场试验。
BMC Med. 2020 Feb 14;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1491-6.
8
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section in Taiwan: A Population-Based Study.台湾地区剖宫产术后经阴道分娩:一项基于人群的研究。
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 12;8(8):1203. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081203.
9
The effectiveness of financial intervention strategies for reducing caesarean section rates: a systematic review.金融干预策略降低剖宫产率的效果:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7265-4.
10
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.美国未参保女性的剖宫产:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.